Industry meets different policy instruments which directly or indirectly affect energy costs and the prospects for energy efficiency improvements. There has been a general trend towards economic instruments. Specifically, emissions trading and carbon taxes has had a significant effect leading to higher electricity prices for industry. Regulation through the Swedish Environmental Code requires that energy efficiency is considered both when giving permits for industrial plants and during auditing of the compliance of activities with the general intentions of the code. The potential role of the Environmental Code as an instrument for accelerating energy efficiency has not been fully tested yet. Since 2005, the Programme for Energy Efficiency opens up for voluntary agreements between industry and government to support energy efficiency. Industry can be exempt from the minimum electricity tax in return for implementing, among other things, an energy management system. Identified energy efficiency measures with a shorter pay back time than three years should also be carried out. In this paper we summarise the current experiences in Sweden on how industry reacts and adapts to the mix of instruments. The overall objective is to take stock of the current situation and discuss implications for future policy. The fact that energy prices have increased considerably in the 20002005 period is the main reason for the increasing interest in energy efficiency and associated measures. In the absence of a level playing field (e.g., global emissions trading or border adjustment taxes to compensate), we propose that regulatory and supportive policy instruments should be used much more extensively and actively than today.
[1]
Bengt Johansson,et al.
Climate policy instruments and industry--effects and potential responses in the Swedish context
,
2006
.
[2]
Patrik Thollander,et al.
Barriers to and driving forces for energy efficiency in the non-energy intensive manufacturing industry in Sweden
,
2006
.
[3]
Mats Söderström,et al.
Reducing industrial energy costs through energy-efficiency measures in a liberalized European electricity market: case study of a Swedish iron foundry
,
2005
.
[4]
Ernst Worrell,et al.
Productivity benefits of industrial energy efficiency measures
,
2003
.
[5]
Jinyue Yan,et al.
Potential and cost-effectiveness of CO2 reductions through energy measures in Swedish pulp and paper mills
,
2003
.
[6]
Katrin Ostertag.
No-regret Potentials in Energy Conservation
,
2003
.
[7]
Patrik Thollander,et al.
Barriers to and drivers for energy efficiency in the Swedish foundry industry
,
2007
.
[8]
Louise Trygg,et al.
SWEDISH INDUSTRIAL AND ENERGY SUPPLY MEASURES IN A EUROPEAN SYSTEM PERSPECTIVE
,
2006
.
[9]
Jamil Khan,et al.
Evaluation of the Energy Audit Programme in Finland
,
2006
.
[10]
Karin Ericsson,et al.
Evaluation of the Danish voluntary agreements on energy efficiency in trade and industry
,
2006
.
[11]
Martijn G. Rietbergen,et al.
The effectiveness of policy instruments for energy efficiency improvements in firms
,
2004
.
[12]
R. N. Elliott,et al.
American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy
,
2002
.