Economic Analysis of the Potential of Cellulosic Biomass Available in France from Agricultural Residue and Energy Crops

The objective of this research is to evaluate the feasibility and locations of using cellulosic biomass both from crop residues and from dedicated energy crops to supply 200-million-liter-biodiesel plants in France. The estimation of the potential amount of agricultural residue available in 2015 in each region of France is calculated. The residues considered in this study come from cereal straw and corn stover. Results show that eight out of the twenty one French regions have enough agricultural residues available to supply at least one 200 million liter biofuel plant. Region Centre has the largest potential, with enough residues to supply three to five plants. Finally, cost of supplying one biodiesel plant of 200 million liters in the region Centre is estimated. Results show that collection of biomass will be effective in an area with a radius of 58 Km to 168 Km depending of the raw material considered and its abundance. The cost of supplying a plant with miscanthus is much higher than with residues only. Thus, crop residues appear to offer a lower cost to produce biodiesel in the near term compared to a dedicated crop. Results show that production of biofuel from cellulosic biomass should not be limited by the supply of raw material, but costs of conversion to liquid fuels clearly will play a key role in the development of cellulosic biofuels. Energy prices and policies will have a significant impact on second generation biofuel development.

[1]  R. Lal.  World crop residues production and implications of its use as a biofuel. , 2005, Environment international.

[2]  Benoit Gabrielle,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of straw use in bio-ethanol production: a case study based on biophysical modelling. , 2008 .

[3]  M. Lévy-Leboyer.  The French Case , 1996 .

[4]  Ronald D. Snee,et al.  Industry, Statistics in , 2006 .

[6]  John Clifton-Brown,et al.  Costs of producing miscanthus and switchgrass for bioenergy in Illinois , 2008 .

[7]  F. Bernard,et al.  Biofuel market and carbon modeling to analyse French biofuel policy , 2007 .

[8]  J. Scurlock,et al.  Miscanthus : European experience with a novel energy crop , 2000 .

[9]  R. Nelson.  Resource assessment and removal analysis for corn stover and wheat straw in the Eastern and Midwestern United States—rainfall and wind-induced soil erosion methodology , 2002 .

[10]  S. Rozakis,et al.  Integrated micro-economic modelling and multi-criteria methodology to support public decision-making: the case of liquid bio-fuels in France , 2001 .

[11]  Mark Stumborg,et al.  Agricultural Biomass Resources in Canada , 2004 .

[12]  B. Dale,et al.  Global potential bioethanol production from wasted crops and crop residues , 2004 .

[13]  Lars J Nilsson,et al.  Assessment of the potential biomass supply in Europe using a resource-focused approach , 2004 .

[14]  John Clifton-Brown,et al.  Miscanthus : European experience with a novel energy crop , 2000 .

[15]  W. Huisman,et al.  Mechanization and Costs of Primary Production Chains forMiscanthus x giganteusin The Netherlands , 1998 .

[16]  Wallace E. Tyner,et al.  The Economics of Biomass Collection and Transportation and Its Supply to Indiana Cellulosic and Electric Utility Facilities , 2011, BioEnergy Research.

[17]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Exploration of the ranges of the global potential of biomass for energy , 2003 .

[18]  D. G. Christian,et al.  Performance of 15 Miscanthus genotypes at five sites in Europe , 2001 .

[19]  Robert C. Brown,et al.  Comparative economics of biorefineries based on the biochemical and thermochemical platforms , 2007 .

[20]  Stelios Rozakis,et al.  Micro-economic modelling of biofuel system in France to determine tax exemption policy under uncertainty , 2005 .

[21]  Paul R. Adler,et al.  Perennial Forages as Second Generation Bioenergy Crops , 2008, International journal of molecular sciences.

[22]  MICHAEL B. Jones,et al.  Miscanthus for Renewable Energy Generation: European Union Experience and Projections for Illinois , 2004 .

[23]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  Biomass as Feedstock for A Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: The Technical Feasibility of a Billion-Ton Annual Supply , 2005 .

[24]  S. Polasky,et al.  Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.