Assessing Built Environment Walkability using Activity-Space Summary Measures.

There is increasing emphasis on active transportation, such as walking, in transportation planning as a sustainable form of mobility and in public health as a means of achieving recommended physical activity and better health outcomes. A research focus is the influence of the built environment on walking, with the ultimate goal of identifying environmental modifications that invite more walking. However, assessments of the built environment for walkability are typically at a spatially disaggregate level (such as street blocks) or at a spatially aggregate level (such as census block groups). A key issue is determining the spatial units for walkability measures so that they reflect potential walking behavior. This paper develops methods for assessing walkability within individual activity spaces: the geographic region accessible to an individual during a given walking trip. We first estimate street network-based activity spaces using the shortest path between known trip starting/ending points and a travel time budget that reflects potential alternative paths. Based on objective walkability measures of the street blocks, we use three summary measures for walkability within activity spaces: i) the average walkability score across block segments (representing the general level of walkability in the activity space); ii) the standard deviation (representing the walkability variation), and; iii) the network autocorrelation (representing the spatial coherence of the walkability pattern). We assess the method using data from an empirical study of built environment walkability and walking behavior in Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. We visualize and map these activity space summary measures to compare walkability among individuals' trips within their neighborhoods. We also compare summary measures for activity spaces versus census block groups, with the result that they agree less than half of the time.

[1]  Frank Witlox,et al.  From the Guest Editors: Mobility, Communication, and Urban Space , 2014 .

[2]  A. El-geneidy,et al.  Does travel behavior matter in defining urban form? A quantitative analysis characterizing distinct areas within a region , 2014 .

[3]  Heidi Hanson,et al.  Neighborhood design for walking and biking: physical activity and body mass index. , 2013, American journal of preventive medicine.

[4]  Ikuho Yamada,et al.  Mixed Land Use and Obesity: An Empirical Comparison of Alternative Land Use Measures and Geographic Scales , 2012, The Professional geographer : the journal of the Association of American Geographers.

[5]  Ann Forsyth,et al.  The Street Level Built Environment and Physical Activity and Walking , 2011 .

[6]  Paul A. Zandbergen,et al.  Dasymetric Mapping Using High Resolution Address Point Datasets , 2011 .

[7]  Carol M. Werner,et al.  Walking routes to school in new urban and suburban neighborhoods: An environmental walkability analysis of blocks and routes , 2011 .

[8]  A. El-geneidy,et al.  Validating walkability indices: How do different households respond to the walkability of their neighborhood? , 2011 .

[9]  A. Bauman,et al.  Mismatch between perceived and objectively assessed neighborhood walkability attributes: prospective relationships with walking and weight gain. , 2011, Health & place.

[10]  Raktim Mitra,et al.  Built Environment Correlates of Active School Transportation: Neighborhood and the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem , 2011 .

[11]  Julien O. Teitler,et al.  Using Google Street View to audit neighborhood environments. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[12]  L. Anselin Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA , 2010 .

[13]  William R. Black,et al.  Network Autocorrelation in Transport Network and Flow Systems , 2010 .

[14]  M. Duncan,et al.  Relationships of Land Use Mix with Walking for Transport: Do Land Uses and Geographical Scale Matter? , 2010, Journal of Urban Health.

[15]  Carol M. Werner,et al.  Light rail use is more likely on “walkable” blocks: Further support for using micro-level environmental audit measures , 2010 .

[16]  Charles E Matthews,et al.  The built environment and location-based physical activity. , 2010, American journal of preventive medicine.

[17]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Creating and validating GIS measures of urban design for health research. , 2009, Journal of environmental psychology.

[18]  Ken R. Smith,et al.  Mixed land use and walkability: Variations in land use measures and relationships with BMI, overweight, and obesity. , 2009, Health & place.

[19]  Alexandra Brewis,et al.  City structure, obesity, and environmental justice: an integrated analysis of physical and social barriers to walkable streets and park access. , 2009, Social science & medicine.

[20]  Dominique Peeters,et al.  Network Autocorrelation: Network Autocorrelation , 2009 .

[21]  Bart Kuijpers,et al.  Modeling uncertainty of moving objects on road networks via space–time prisms , 2009, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[22]  Christine M. Hoehner,et al.  Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science. , 2009, American journal of preventive medicine.

[23]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Measuring the Unmeasurable: Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability , 2009 .

[24]  Marc P. Armstrong,et al.  Alternative Techniques for Masking Geographic Detail to Protect Privacy , 2007 .

[25]  N. Owen,et al.  Destinations that matter: associations with walking for transport. , 2007, Health & place.

[26]  Arthur Getis,et al.  Reflections on spatial autocorrelation , 2007 .

[27]  Asha Weinstein Agrawal,et al.  How Far, by Which Route and Why? A Spatial Analysis of Pedestrian Preference , 2007 .

[28]  A. Bauman,et al.  Walkability of local communities: using geographic information systems to objectively assess relevant environmental attributes. , 2007, Health & place.

[29]  T. Koepsell,et al.  Association of the built environment with physical activity and obesity in older persons. , 2007, American journal of public health.

[30]  Carol M. Werner,et al.  Walkable Route Perceptions and Physical Features , 2007 .

[31]  Ester Cerin,et al.  Applying GIS in Physical Activity Research: Community ‘Walkability’ and Walking Behaviors , 2007 .

[32]  Anne Vernez Moudon,et al.  Built environment and behavior: spatial sampling using parcel data. , 2006, Annals of epidemiology.

[33]  Ann Forsyth,et al.  The Irvine-Minnesota inventory to measure built environments: development. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[34]  Ann Forsyth,et al.  The Irvine-Minnesota inventory to measure built environments: reliability tests. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[35]  A. Moudon,et al.  Correlates of Walking for Transportation or Recreation Purposes. , 2006, Journal of physical activity & health.

[36]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Identifying and Measuring Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability. , 2006, Journal of physical activity & health.

[37]  A. Cheadle,et al.  Operational Definitions of Walkable Neighborhood: Theoretical and Empirical Insights. , 2006, Journal of physical activity & health.

[38]  Marc Schlossberg From TIGER to Audit Instruments: Measuring Neighborhood Walkability with Street Data Based on Geographic Information Systems , 2006 .

[39]  Mariela Alfonzo,et al.  To Walk or Not to Walk? The Hierarchy of Walking Needs , 2005 .

[40]  Lawrence D. Frank,et al.  Active transportation and physical activity: opportunities for collaboration on transportation and public health research , 2004 .

[41]  Anne Vernez Moudon,et al.  Walking and Bicycling: An Evaluation of Environmental Audit Instruments , 2003, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[42]  J. Sallis,et al.  Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[43]  C. Coulton,et al.  Mapping Residents' Perceptions of Neighborhood Boundaries: A Methodological Note , 2001, American journal of community psychology.

[44]  Harvey J. Miller,et al.  Measuring Space‐Time Accessibility Benefits within Transportation Networks: Basic Theory and Computational Procedures , 1999 .

[45]  Reginald G. Golledge,et al.  Analytical Behavioural Geography , 1987 .

[46]  D. C. Howell Fundamental Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 1985 .

[47]  Torsten Hägerstraand WHAT ABOUT PEOPLE IN REGIONAL SCIENCE , 1970 .