Self‐Stimulation of the Ventral Tegmental Area Enhances Dopamine Release in the Nucleus Accumbens: A Microdialysis Study a

Several groups'-' maintain that substances of abuse such as cocaine achieve their rewarding properties by the activation of a specific reward system in the brain that also will support intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS). There are a number of advantages in the use of the ICSS procedure to study the rewarding effects of drugs, including its methodological simplicity and the high concordance between the pharmacological ticilitation of ICSS and human addiction liability data.' Most researchers who study the effects of drugs on ICSS are well aware of the possible confounds that can arise from unconditioned motor effects of the drugs and from htigue. Accordingly, procedures have been developed to measure current thresholds required to maintain ICSS. Employing this procedure, Esposito et al. showed that cocaine lowered the threshold for rewarding brain-stimulation, thereby extending Crow's6 initial report of an increase in ICSS rate by cocaine. A distinct advantage of using the ICSS procedure to study drug-reward is the information provided about neuronal circuits that may subserve the rewarding properties of drugs of abuse. A large body of data derived from pharmacological, neurotoxic lesion and postmortem neurochemical studies support the role of mesotelencephalic dopaminergic neurons in ICSS at sites in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and parts ofthe medial foreblain bundle (MFB) (cf. refs. 2,4,7). Until recently however, critical in pivo evidence in support of this hypothesis was lacking. Two new techniques for mea-

[1]  N. Ozaki,et al.  The effect of uptake inhibition on dopamine release from the nucleus accumbens of rats during self- or forced stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle: A microdialysis study , 1989, Neuroscience Letters.

[2]  M. Bozarth An Overview of Assessing Drug Reinforcement , 1987 .

[3]  C. Blaha,et al.  Neurochemical correlates of brain-stimulation reward measured by ex vivo and in vivo analyses , 1989, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[4]  C. Blaha,et al.  Electrochemical evaluation of stearate-modified graphite paste electrodes: selective etection of dopamine is maintained after exposure to brain tissue , 1991 .

[5]  C. Blaha,et al.  Application of in vivo electrochemistry to the measurement of changes in dopamine release during intracranial self-stimulation , 1990, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  M. Bozarth Methods of Assessing the Reinforcing Properties of Abused Drugs , 1989, Springer New York.

[7]  B. Westerink,et al.  Scope and limitations of in vivo brain dialysis: a comparison of its application to various neurotransmitter systems. , 1987, Life sciences.

[8]  A. Phillips,et al.  Increased in vivo tyrosine hydroxylase activity in rat telencephalon produced by self-stimulation of the ventral tegmental area , 1987, Brain Research.

[9]  Norio Ozaki,et al.  increased dopamine and serotonin metabolism in rat nucleus accumbens produced by intracranial self-stimulation of medial forebrain bundle as measured by in vivo microdialysis , 1989, Brain Research.

[10]  Greg A. Gerhardt,et al.  Effects of electrical stimulation of brain reward sites on release of dopamine in rat: An in vivo electrochemical study , 1988, Brain Research Bulletin.

[11]  C. Kornetsky,et al.  Cocaine: Acute effects of reinforcement thresholds for self-stimulation behavior to the medial forebrain bundle , 1978, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[12]  Anthony G. Phillips,et al.  Brain reward circuitry: A case for separate systems , 1984, Brain Research Bulletin.

[13]  T. Crow,et al.  Enhancement of coaine of intra-cranial self-stimulation in the rat. , 1970, Life sciences.

[14]  H. Fibiger,et al.  Sexual behavior enhances central dopamine transmission in the male rat , 1990, Brain Research.