Adherence to an Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol for Chest Pain: Secondary Analysis of the HEART Pathway Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVES Accelerated diagnostic protocols (ADPs), such as the HEART Pathway, are gaining popularity in emergency departments (EDs) as tools used to risk stratify patients with acute chest pain. However, provider nonadherence may threaten the safety and effectiveness of ADPs. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency and impact of ADP nonadherence. METHODS A secondary analysis of participants enrolled in the HEART Pathway RCT was conducted. This trial enrolled 282 adult ED patients with symptoms concerning for acute coronary syndrome without ST-elevation on electrocardiogram. Patients randomized to the HEART Pathway (N = 141) were included in this analysis. Outcomes included index visit disposition, nonadherence, and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 30 days. MACE was defined as death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization. Nonadherence was defined as: 1) undertesting-discharging a high-risk patient from the ED without objective testing (stress testing or coronary angiography) or 2) overtesting-admitting or obtaining objective testing on a low-risk patient. RESULTS Nonadherence to the HEART Pathway occurred in 28 of 141 patients (20%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 14% to 27%). Overtesting occurred in 19 of 141 patients (13.5%, 95% CI = 8% to 19%) and undertesting in nine of 141 patients (6%, 95% CI = 3% to 12%). None of these 28 patients suffered MACE. The net effect of nonadherence was 10 additional admissions among patients identified as low-risk and appropriate for early discharge (absolute decrease in discharge rate of 7%, 95% CI = 3% to 13%). CONCLUSIONS Real-time use of the HEART Pathway resulted in a nonadherence rate of 20%, mostly due to overtesting. None of these patients had MACE within 30 days. Nonadherence decreased the discharge rate, attenuating the HEART Pathway's impact on health care use.

[1]  A. Stillman,et al.  Coronary CT angiography in acute chest pain , 2017, F1000Research.

[2]  G. Burke,et al.  The HEART Pathway Randomized Trial: Identifying Emergency Department Patients With Acute Chest Pain for Early Discharge , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[3]  A. Hoes,et al.  A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[4]  A. Singer,et al.  Identifying patients for early discharge: performance of decision rules among patients with acute chest pain. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[5]  William Parsonage,et al.  The HEART score for the assessment of patients with chest pain in the emergency department: a multinational validation study. , 2013, Critical pathways in cardiology.

[6]  C. Reid,et al.  2-Hour accelerated diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms using contemporary troponins as the only biomarker: the ADAPT trial. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  C. Gatsonis,et al.  CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  D. Goff,et al.  Can the HEART score safely reduce stress testing and cardiac imaging in patients at low risk for major adverse cardiac events? , 2011, Critical pathways in cardiology.

[9]  R. Califf,et al.  2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update of the Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/ Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Updating the 2007 Guideline): A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines , 2011, Circulation.

[10]  C. Reid,et al.  A 2-h diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms in the Asia-Pacific region (ASPECT): a prospective observational validation study , 2011, The Lancet.

[11]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2011, Circulation.

[12]  J. Nolan,et al.  Part 9: Acute coronary syndromes: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. , 2010, Circulation.

[13]  J. Nolan,et al.  Part 9: Acute coronary syndromes: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. , 2010, Resuscitation.

[14]  J. Hollander,et al.  The effect of physician risk tolerance and the presence of an observation unit on decision making for ED patients with chest pain. , 2010, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[15]  P. Doevendans,et al.  Chest pain in the emergency room: a multicenter validation of the HEART Score. , 2010, Critical pathways in cardiology.

[16]  R. Mutter,et al.  Emergency department care in the United States: a profile of national data sources. , 2010, Annals of emergency medicine.

[17]  Luke K. Hermann,et al.  The limited utility of routine cardiac stress testing in emergency department chest pain patients younger than 40 years. , 2009, Annals of emergency medicine.

[18]  J. Hollander,et al.  The association between physician risk tolerance and imaging use in abdominal pain. , 2009, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[19]  J. Kelder,et al.  Chest pain in the emergency room: value of the HEART score , 2008, Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation.

[20]  Fred S Apple,et al.  Universal definition of myocardial infarction. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Coronary Multidetector Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Patients With Acute Chest Pain , 2006, Circulation.

[22]  Alan E. Jones,et al.  Electronic medical record review as a surrogate to telephone follow-up to establish outcome for diagnostic research studies in the emergency department. , 2005, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[23]  T. Aufderheide,et al.  Standardized reporting guidelines for studies evaluating risk stratification of emergency department patients with potential acute coronary syndromes. , 2004, Annals of emergency medicine.

[24]  L. Goldman,et al.  Critical Pathways for Patients with Acute Chest Pain at Low Risk , 2002, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[25]  Ralph G Brindis,et al.  Physician adherence to clinical practice guidelines: does it really matter? , 2003, American heart journal.

[26]  R Ruthazer,et al.  Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  E. Antman,et al.  The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. , 2000, JAMA.

[28]  R. Hendel,et al.  Clinical value of acute rest technetium-99m tetrofosmin tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with acute chest pain and nondiagnostic electrocardiograms. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  J. Muhlestein,et al.  An emergency department-based protocol for rapidly ruling out myocardial ischemia reduces hospital time and expense: results of a randomized study (ROMIO). , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  N. Kleiman,et al.  Earlier diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction necessitates the need for a 'new diagnostic mind-set'. , 1994, Circulation.