Characterizing patent big data upon IPC: a survey of triadic patent families and PCT applications

[1]  Irina Ervits.  The effect of co-patenting as a form of knowledge meta-integration on technological differentiation at Siemens , 2023, European Journal of Innovation Management.

[2]  Helena H. Zhang,et al.  Identifying grey-rhino in eminent technologies via patent analysis , 2023, J. Data Inf. Sci..

[3]  E. Roszko-Wójtowicz,et al.  In search of key determinants of innovativeness in the regions of the Visegrad group countries , 2022, Oeconomia Copernicana.

[4]  M. Alazab,et al.  Mixed Game-Based AoI Optimization for Combating COVID-19 With AI Bots , 2022, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[5]  Nawab Muhammad Faseeh Qureshi,et al.  I-Health: SDN-Based Fog Architecture for IIoT Applications in Healthcare. , 2022, IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics.

[6]  Gautam Srivastava,et al.  Blockchain and PUF-Based Lightweight Authentication Protocol for Wireless Medical Sensor Networks , 2022, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[7]  Kyle W. Higham,et al.  Multilayer patent citation networks: A comprehensive analytical framework for studying explicit technological relationships , 2022, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[8]  Jooyeoun Lee,et al.  Analysis of the Relationship Between Regulation and R&D Efficiency Using Quantile Regression , 2022, International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing.

[9]  U. Schmoch,et al.  China’s technological performance as reflected in patents , 2021, Scientometrics.

[10]  K. Bi,et al.  Exploring and visualizing co-patent networks in bioenergy field: A perspective from inventor, transnational inventor, and country , 2021, International Journal of Green Energy.

[11]  Andrea Furková.  Implementation of MGWR-SAR models for investigating a local particularity of European regional innovation processes , 2021, Central Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie,et al.  Energy efficiency: The role of technological innovation and knowledge spillover , 2021, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[13]  T. Naegler,et al.  Comparative patent analysis for the identification of global research trends for the case of battery storage, hydrogen and bioenergy , 2021 .

[14]  Claudia Noumedem Temgoua,et al.  Inventor migration and knowledge flows: A two-way communication channel? , 2020, Research Policy.

[15]  Yanghon Chung,et al.  Knowledge spillover efficiency of carbon capture, utilization, and storage technology: A comparison among countries , 2020 .

[16]  Fred Y. Ye,et al.  Measuring similarity for clarifying layer difference in multiplex ad hoc duplex information networks , 2020, J. Informetrics.

[17]  Richa Kumari,et al.  Topic modelling and social network analysis of publications and patents in humanoid robot technology , 2019, J. Inf. Sci..

[18]  Mahmood H. Shubbak.  Advances in solar photovoltaics: Technology review and patent trends , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[19]  F. Ganda.  The impact of innovation and technology investments on carbon emissions in selected organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[20]  Triadic patent families , 2019 .

[21]  H. Merritt,et al.  Promotion of technological development and determination of biotechnology trends in five selected Latin American countries: An analysis based on PCT patent applications , 2019, Electronic Journal of Biotechnology.

[22]  C. Beaudry,et al.  Capturing the economic value of triadic patents , 2018, Scientometrics.

[23]  Shixiong Cheng,et al.  International R&D Spillovers and Innovation Efficiency , 2018, Sustainability.

[24]  Irina Ervits.  Geography of corporate innovation , 2018 .

[25]  Chaoying Tang,et al.  How could firm's internal R&D collaboration bring more innovation? , 2017 .

[26]  Massimo Aria,et al.  bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[27]  A. Petruzzelli,et al.  Mapping innovation dynamics in the Internet of Things domain: Evidence from patent analysis , 2017, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[28]  Zdřálek Petr,et al.  Commercial Potential of University Patents Through Patent Cooperation Treaty Application , 2017 .

[29]  Yutao Sun,et al.  The structure and dynamics of intra- and inter-regional research collaborative networks: The case of China (1985–2008) , 2016 .

[30]  So Young Sohn,et al.  Quantifying technology–industry spillover effects based on patent citation network analysis of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) , 2016 .

[31]  So Young Sohn,et al.  Predicting the pattern of technology convergence using big-data technology on large-scale triadic patents , 2015 .

[32]  Tetsuo Wada,et al.  Cognitive Distances in Prior Art Search by the Triadic Patent Offices: Empirical Evidence from International Search Reports , 2015, ISSI.

[33]  S. Rijcke,et al.  Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics , 2015, Nature.

[34]  A. Petruzzelli,et al.  Understanding the development trends of low-carbon energy technologies: A patent analysis , 2014 .

[35]  J. A. R. Gregolin,et al.  Patents in nanotechnology: an analysis using macro-indicators and forecasting curves , 2014, Scientometrics.

[36]  F. Zhang,et al.  Patent activity analysis of vibration-reduction control technology in high-speed railway vehicle systems in China , 2014, Scientometrics.

[37]  Jiang Li,et al.  Abstracting the core subnet of weighted networks based on link strengths , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[38]  Yunhao Liu,et al.  Big Data: A Survey , 2014, Mob. Networks Appl..

[39]  Dar-Zen Chen,et al.  Analyzing Taiwan’s patenting performance: Comparing US patents and triadic patent families , 2014 .

[40]  M. Cornel,et al.  Trends in genetic patent applications: the commercialization of academic intellectual property , 2014, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[41]  G. Elias,et al.  A study of inventiveness among Society of Interventional Radiology members and the impact of their social networks. , 2013, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[42]  Show-Ling Jang,et al.  The patterns and propensity for international co-invention: the case of China , 2013, Scientometrics.

[43]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact , 2012, MIS Q..

[44]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Interactive overlay maps for US patent (USPTO) data based on International Patent Classification (IPC) , 2012, Scientometrics.

[45]  Star X. Zhao,et al.  Exploring the directed h-degree in directed weighted networks , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[46]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  The Worldwide Count of Priority Patents: A New Indicator of Inventive Activity , 2012 .

[47]  A. Schubert.  A Hirsch-type index of co-author partnership ability , 2012, Scientometrics.

[48]  András Schubert,et al.  A Hirsch-type index of co-author partnership ability , 2011, Scientometrics.

[49]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  h-Degree as a basic measure in weighted networks , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[50]  R. Kumazawa,et al.  An empirical analysis of patents flows and R&D flows around the world , 2011 .

[51]  Ramesh Chandra Tripathi,et al.  A case study of impact of patenting in the current developing economies in Asia , 2011, Scientometrics.

[52]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Characterizations of the generalized Wu- and Kosmulski-indices in Lotkaian systems , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[53]  J. Leker,et al.  Patent indicators for monitoring convergence - examples from NFF and ICT , 2011 .

[54]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  The h-index: a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator , 2010, J. Documentation.

[55]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Probing the h-core: an investigation of the tail–core ratio for rank distributions , 2010, Scientometrics.

[56]  G. Gijsbers,et al.  The use of social network analysis in innovation studies: Mapping actors and technologies , 2010 .

[57]  Sungjoo Lee,et al.  Inter-technology networks to support innovation strategy: An analysis of Korea’s new growth engines , 2010 .

[58]  Qiang Wu,et al.  The w-index: A measure to assess scientific impact by focusing on widely cited papers , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[59]  Jennifer Clark,et al.  A Typology of ‘Innovation Districts’: What it Means for Regional Resilience , 2010 .

[60]  Eliot Marshall,et al.  Complex systems and networks. Connections. Introduction. , 2009, Science.

[61]  K. Luintel,et al.  Heterogeneous Ideas Production and Endogenous Growth: An Empirical Investigation , 2009 .

[62]  Christian Sternitzke,et al.  Defining triadic patent families as a measure of technological strength , 2009, Scientometrics.

[63]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Patent classifications as indicators of intellectual organization , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[64]  Christian Sternitzke,et al.  Visualizing patent statistics by means of social network analysis tools , 2008 .

[65]  L. Egghe,et al.  Theory and practise of the g-index , 2006, Scientometrics.

[66]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  New developments related to the Hirsch index , 2006 .

[67]  Paola Criscuolo,et al.  The 'home advantage' effect and patent families. A comparison of OECD triadic patents, the USPTO and the EPO , 2006, Scientometrics.

[68]  Charles Auffray,et al.  F1000Prime recommendation of An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. , 2005 .

[69]  Hélène Dernis,et al.  Triadic Patent Families Methodology , 2004 .

[70]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Network analysis of 2-mode data , 1997 .

[71]  S. Rijcke,et al.  Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. , 2015, Nature.

[72]  J Hillier,et al.  Connections: An introduction , 2015 .

[73]  Chulhyun Kim,et al.  On A Patent Analysis Method for Technological Convergence , 2012 .

[74]  Leo Egghe,et al.  The Hirsch index and related impact measures , 2010, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[75]  Kuei-Kuei Lai,et al.  Exploring technology diffusion and classification of business methods: Using the patent citation network , 2009 .

[76]  Rainer Frietsch,et al.  Transnational patents and international markets , 2009, Scientometrics.

[77]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  A Policy Insight into the R&D-Patent Relationship , 2007 .

[78]  L. Egghe.  Power Laws in the Information Production Process: Lotkaian Informetrics , 2005 .

[79]  Hilde van der Togt,et al.  Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..