Using log data to investigate the impact of (a)synchronous learning tools on LMS interaction

This paper presents exploratory examination of LMS log data from ten undergraduate business courses that differ in terms of learning activity design. Data were derived from the Unit Statistics and User Activity functions on Blackboard versions 8 and 9.1, which report the number of student hits across the various LMS applications. The research identifies obstacles encountered when using log data. Findings suggest that the design of learning activities has substantial impact upon levels of student interaction with the LMS. Furthermore the greater the amount of asynchronous learning activities, versus synchronous ones, may generate increased student interaction not just with the interactive applications but with the LMS overall. This outcome is particularly relevant given the correlation between LMS interaction and student results reported in other studies. The research confirms the potential of log data to inform online teaching practice, highlights some of challenges involved and outlines avenues for future research.

[1]  Edwina M. Luck,et al.  Students' attitudes and perceptions to online tutorials , 2004 .

[2]  Francoise Pradel,et al.  Students' perceptions and satisfaction with a web-based human nutrition course. , 2008, American journal of pharmaceutical education.

[3]  Lina Lee,et al.  Using Web-Based Instruction to Promote Active Learning: Learners' Perspectives. , 2013 .

[4]  D. Weaver,et al.  Academic and student use of a learning management system: Implications for quality , 2008 .

[5]  Colin Beer,et al.  The indicators project identifying effective learning: Adoption, activity, grades and external factors , 2009 .

[6]  Jihie Kim,et al.  Pedagogical Discourse: Connecting Students to Past Discussions and Peer Mentors within an Online Discussion Board , 2009, IAAI.

[7]  S. M. Lee,et al.  Blended learning and online tutoring , 2009 .

[8]  Kara Dawson,et al.  Data for free: Using LMS activity logs to measure community in online courses , 2008, Internet High. Educ..

[9]  Steven J. Greenland,et al.  To blend or not to blend? Synchronous and asynchronous teaching perspectives in online marketing education , 2010 .

[10]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Examining facilitators' habits of mind in an asynchronous online discussion environment: A two cases study , 2010 .

[11]  Dawn Birch,et al.  Students' Perceptions Of Compulsory Asynchronous Online Discussion , 2005 .

[12]  Hsieh-Hua Yang,et al.  A study of generating teaching portfolio from LMS logs , 2010 .

[13]  Janet Macdonald,et al.  Blended Learning And Online Tutoring: A Good Practice Guide , 2006 .

[14]  Shane Dawson,et al.  Mining LMS data to develop an "early warning system" for educators: A proof of concept , 2010, Comput. Educ..