Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis.

OBJECTIVES Our aim was to analyze and compare systematically the relative and interactive effects of implant diameter, length, and taper on calculated crestal bone strains. MATERIAL AND METHODS Three-dimensional finite-element models were created of a 20-mm premolar section of the mandible with a single endosseous implant embedded in high- or low-density cancellous bone. Oblique (200-N vertical and 40-N horizontal) occlusal loading was applied. Cortical and cancellous bone were modeled as transversely isotropic and linearly elastic. Perfect bonding was assumed at all interfaces. A two-level factorial statistical design was used to determine the main and interactive effects of four implant design variables on maximum shear strains in the crestal alveolar bone: diameter, length of tapered segment, length of untapered segment, and taper. Implant diameter ranged from 3.5 to 6 mm, total implant length from 5.75 to 23.5 mm, and taper from 0 to 14 degrees , resulting in 16 implant designs. RESULTS Increasing implant diameter resulted in as much as a 3.5-fold reduction in crestal strain, increasing length caused as much as a 1.65-fold reduction, whereas taper increased crestal strain, especially in narrow and short implants, where it increased 1.65-fold. Diameter, length, and taper have to be considered together because of their interactive effects on crestal bone strain. CONCLUSION If the objective is to minimize peri-implant strain in the crestal alveolar bone, a wide and relatively long, untapered implant appears to be the most favorable choice. Narrow, short implants with taper in the crestal region should be avoided, especially in low-density bone.

[1]  John L. Williams,et al.  SHAPE OPTIMIZATION OF DENTAL IMPLANT DESIGNS UNDER OBLIQUE LOADING USING THE p-VERSION FINITE ELEMENT METHOD , 2002 .

[2]  F. Isidor,et al.  Histological evaluation of peri-implant bone at implants subjected to occlusal overload or plaque accumulation. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[3]  J Duyck,et al.  Biomechanics of oral implants: a review of the literature. , 1997, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[4]  D T Davy,et al.  Comparison of damage accumulation measures in human cortical bone. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  M. Quirynen,et al.  Periodontal aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting a partial bridge. An up to 6-years retrospective study. , 1992, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[6]  F. Mante,et al.  Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis--a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. , 1998, The Journal of oral implantology.

[7]  S. Schou,et al.  Ligature-induced marginal inflammation around osseointegrated implants and ankylosed teeth: stereologic and histologic observations in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). , 1993, Journal of periodontology.

[8]  D Siegele,et al.  Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. , 1989, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[9]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Experimental breakdown of peri-implant and periodontal tissues. A study in the beagle dog. , 1992, Clinical oral implants research.

[10]  H Vaillancourt,et al.  Factors affecting crestal bone loss with dental implants partially covered with a porous coating: a finite element analysis. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[11]  M. Norton,et al.  Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro- and microstructure. , 1998, Clinical oral implants research.

[12]  G. Liu,et al.  Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[13]  S. Cowin,et al.  Non-interacting modes for stress, strain and energy in anisotropic hard tissue. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  L. Rasmusson,et al.  The use of a conical fixture design for fixed partial prostheses. A preliminary report. , 1998, Clinical oral implants research.

[15]  T Jemt,et al.  Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: a preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures. , 1989, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[16]  R B Ashman,et al.  Elastic properties of human supraorbital and mandibular bone. , 1993, American journal of physical anthropology.

[17]  P. Pröschel,et al.  In vivo forces on implants influenced by occlusal scheme and food consistency. , 2003, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[18]  F. Isidor,et al.  Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[19]  S Winkler,et al.  Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter. , 2000, Annals of periodontology.

[20]  James Laney Williams,et al.  Anisotropic elasticity of cortical and cancellous bone in the posterior mandible increases peri-implant stress and strain under oblique loading. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[21]  D. Sarment,et al.  Five-mm-diameter implants without a smooth surface collar: report on 98 consecutive placements. , 1999, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[22]  H. Chun,et al.  Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis. , 2002, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[23]  W E Roberts,et al.  Bone tissue interface. , 1988, Journal of dental education.

[24]  F Guilak,et al.  Differentiation of the Bone-Tissue Remodeling Response to Axial and Torsional Loading in the Turkey Ulna*† , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  S C Bayne,et al.  3D-FEA of osseointegration percentages and patterns on implant-bone interfacial stresses. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.

[26]  S. Nyman,et al.  Clinical and microbiologic findings that may contribute to dental implant failure. , 1990, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[27]  Holmes Dc,et al.  Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants. , 1997, The Journal of oral implantology.

[28]  J. Kuiper,et al.  Stress distribution around dental implants: influence of superstructure, length of implants, and height of mandible. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[29]  T Suetsugu,et al.  Two-dimensional FEM analysis of hydroxyapatite implants: diameter effects on stress distribution. , 1990, The Journal of oral implantology.

[30]  Haruka Kusakari,et al.  Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. , 2003, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[31]  M W Bidez,et al.  Mechanical properties of trabecular bone in the human mandible: implications for dental implant treatment planning and surgical placement. , 1999, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[32]  D van Steenberghe,et al.  Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark system. , 1992, Clinical oral implants research.

[33]  P. Pröschel,et al.  Measurement of masticatory forces and implant loads: a methodologic clinical study. , 2002, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[34]  P. Branemark,et al.  Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures (I). A 3-year longitudinal prospective study. , 1986, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[35]  A Chamay,et al.  Mechanical and morphological aspects of experimental overload and fatigue in bone. , 1970, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  R. Palmer,et al.  A prospective study of Astra single tooth implants. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[37]  G Van der Perre,et al.  The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants. , 1998, Clinical oral implants research.

[38]  P Missika,et al.  Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[39]  J O Katz,et al.  Anisotropic elastic properties of cancellous bone from a human edentulous mandible. , 2000, Clinical oral implants research.

[40]  L Sennerby,et al.  Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report. , 1999, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[41]  A Boyde,et al.  Variation in the apparent density of human mandibular bone with age and dental status , 1998, Journal of anatomy.