A single-center multidisciplinary approach to managing the global Erwinia asparaginase shortage

Abstract The availability of Erwinia Asparaginase has been limited across the world due to manufacturing shortages or for some countries due to the high acquisition cost, putting patients at risk for inferior outcomes. This manuscript provides guidance on how to manage hypersensitivity reactions and utilize therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to conserve and limit Erwinia use. The clinical and financial impact of a multidisciplinary committee are also discussed. Faced with a global Erwinia shortage, a multidisciplinary asparaginase allergy committee was created to review all hypersensitivity reactions to asparaginase therapy, staff education was performed on the management of asparaginase hypersensitivity reactions, an institution-wide premedication policy was mandated, and standardized guidelines were created for TDM. This multidisciplinary approach reduced the PEG-asparaginase to Erwinia switch rate from 21% (35 of 163) to 7% (10 of 134) (p = .0035). A multifaceted approach can safely maintain patients on PEG-asparaginase and conserve Erwinia for patients who need it most.

[1]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  A pediatric regimen for older adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of CALGB 10403. , 2019, Blood.

[2]  M. Loh,et al.  Plasma asparaginase activity and asparagine depletion in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients treated with pegaspargase on Children’s Oncology Group AALL07P4* , 2019, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[3]  C. U. Uyl‐de Groot,et al.  A cost‐effectiveness analysis of Erwinia asparaginase therapy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia , 2018, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[4]  A. Bleyer,et al.  Treatment of young adults with Philadelphia‐negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoblastic lymphoma: Hyper‐CVAD vs. pediatric‐inspired regimens , 2018, American journal of hematology.

[5]  M. Loh,et al.  Severe pegaspargase hypersensitivity reaction rates (grade ≥3) with intravenous infusion vs. intramuscular injection: analysis of 54,280 doses administered to 16,534 patients on children’s oncology group (COG) clinical trials , 2018, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[6]  B. Bostrom,et al.  Asparaginase activity levels and monitoring in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia , 2018, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[7]  D. Bixby,et al.  Catalyzing improvements in ALL therapy with asparaginase. , 2017, Blood reviews.

[8]  S. Rheingold,et al.  Differentiating hypersensitivity versus infusion-related reactions in pediatric patients receiving intravenous asparaginase therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia , 2017, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[9]  K. Goddard,et al.  Comparison of hypersensitivity rates to intravenous and intramuscular PEG‐asparaginase in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A meta‐analysis and systematic review , 2017, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[10]  D. Neuberg,et al.  Randomized Study of Pegasparagase (SS-PEG) and Calaspargase Pegol (SC-PEG) in Pediatric Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Lymphoblastic Lymphoma: Results of DFCI ALL Consortium Protocol 11-001 , 2016 .

[11]  S. Devlin,et al.  A Pediatric-Inspired Regimen Containing Multiple Doses of Intravenous Pegylated Asparaginase Appears Safe and Effective in Newly Diagnosed Adult Patients with Ph-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adults up to Age 60: Results of a Multi-Center Phase II Clinical Trial , 2016 .

[12]  G. Escherich,et al.  Allergic‐like reactions to asparaginase: Atypical allergies without asparaginase inactivation , 2016, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[13]  H. Dombret,et al.  Rituximab in B-Lineage Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  B. Asselin Immunology of infusion reactions in the treatment of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 2016, Future oncology.

[15]  A. Baruchel,et al.  Consensus expert recommendations for identification and management of asparaginase hypersensitivity and silent inactivation , 2016, Haematologica.

[16]  M. Barth,et al.  The Incidence of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Pegylated Asparaginase in Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A City-wide Experience , 2016, Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology.

[17]  L. Silverman,et al.  Activity and Toxicity of Intravenous Erwinia Asparaginase Following Allergy to E. coli‐Derived Asparaginase in Children and Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia , 2015, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[18]  Traci M. Blonquist,et al.  Intravenous pegylated asparaginase versus intramuscular native Escherichia coli L-asparaginase in newly diagnosed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (DFCI 05-001): a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[19]  N. Boissel,et al.  Best Practices in Adolescent and Young Adult Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Focus on Asparaginase , 2015, Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology.

[20]  W. Stock,et al.  How I treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia in older adolescents and young adults. , 2015, Blood.

[21]  A. Bleyer,et al.  Clinical application of asparaginase activity levels following treatment with pegaspargase , 2015, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[22]  Anthony J. Perissinotti,et al.  Pharmacokinetic and clinical considerations for monitoring asparaginase activity levels during pegaspargase therapy , 2015, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[23]  M. Loh,et al.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of calaspargase pegol Escherichia coli L-asparaginase in the treatment of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from Children's Oncology Group Study AALL07P4. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  J. Shuster,et al.  Dose Intensification of Methotrexate and Cytarabine During Intensified Continuation Chemotherapy for High-risk B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: POG 9406 A Report From the Children’s Oncology Group , 2014, Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology.

[25]  M. Burke How to manage asparaginase hypersensitivity in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 2014, Future oncology.

[26]  W. Tissing,et al.  Desensitization protocol should not be used in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients with silent inactivation of PEGasparaginase , 2014, Haematologica.

[27]  C. McCracken,et al.  Comparison of Allergic Reactions to Intravenous and Intramuscular Pegaspargase in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia , 2014, Pediatric hematology and oncology.

[28]  P. Demoly,et al.  International Consensus on drug allergy , 2014, Allergy.

[29]  M. Tallman,et al.  Pharmacokinetics-based integration of multiple doses of intravenous pegaspargase in a pediatric regimen for adults with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  W. Tissing,et al.  A prospective study on drug monitoring of PEGasparaginase and Erwinia asparaginase and asparaginase antibodies in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 2013, Blood.

[31]  S. Hunger,et al.  Erwinia asparaginase achieves therapeutic activity after pegaspargase allergy: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. , 2013, Blood.

[32]  M. Relling,et al.  Postinduction dexamethasone and individualized dosing of Escherichia Coli L-asparaginase each improve outcome of children and adolescents with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from a randomized study--Dana-Farber Cancer Institute ALL Consortium Protocol 00-01. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  R. Wade,et al.  Treatment reduction for children and young adults with low-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia defined by minimal residual disease (UKALL 2003): a randomised controlled trial. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[34]  T. D. de Koning,et al.  High incidence of symptomatic hyperammonemia in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving pegylated asparaginase. , 2013, JIMD reports.

[35]  Pascal Richette,et al.  Antibodies against polyethylene glycol in healthy subjects and in patients treated with PEG-conjugated agents , 2012, Expert opinion on drug delivery.

[36]  A. Bleyer,et al.  Prevention and management of asparaginase/pegasparaginase-associated toxicities in adults and older adolescents: recommendations of an expert panel , 2011, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[37]  H. Çaksen,et al.  A Desensitization Protocol in Children With L-Asparaginase Hypersensitivity , 2010, Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology.

[38]  D. Neuberg,et al.  Erwinia asparaginase after allergy to E. coli asparaginase in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia , 2010, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[39]  B. Sekerel,et al.  Alternative algorithm for L-asparaginase allergy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 2009, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[40]  D. Douer Is asparaginase a critical component in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia? , 2008, Best practice & research. Clinical haematology.

[41]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  What determines the outcomes for adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on cooperative group protocols? A comparison of Children's Cancer Group and Cancer and Leukemia Group B studies. , 2008, Blood.

[42]  M. D. Boer,et al.  Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and intracellular effects of PEG-asparaginase in newly diagnosed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from a single agent window study , 2008, Leukemia.

[43]  N. Heerema,et al.  Early postinduction intensification therapy improves survival for children and adolescents with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. , 2008, Blood.

[44]  A. Periclou,et al.  Pharmacodynamics and safety of intravenous pegaspargase during remission induction in adults aged 55 years or younger with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 2007, Blood.

[45]  S. Richards,et al.  Adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: Outcome on UK national paediatric (ALL97) and adult (UKALLXII/E2993) trials , 2007, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[46]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  Effective asparagine depletion with pegylated asparaginase results in improved outcomes in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 9511. , 2005, Blood.

[47]  M. Zucchetti,et al.  A pharmacological study on pegylated asparaginase used in front-line treatment of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 2006, Haematologica.

[48]  S. Schuster,et al.  Selective apoptosis of natural killer‐cell tumours by l‐asparaginase , 2005, British journal of haematology.

[49]  P. Sonneveld,et al.  Significant difference in outcome for adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on pediatric vs adult protocols in the Netherlands , 2004, Leukemia.

[50]  J. Cayuela,et al.  Should adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia be treated as old children or young adults? Comparison of the French FRALLE-93 and LALA-94 trials. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[51]  J. Neglia,et al.  A randomized comparison of native Escherichia coli asparaginase and polyethylene glycol conjugated asparaginase for treatment of children with newly diagnosed standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children's Cancer Group study. , 2002, Blood.

[52]  R. Gelber,et al.  Improved outcome for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of Dana-Farber Consortium Protocol 91-01. , 2001, Blood.

[53]  B. Pollock,et al.  Weekly polyethylene glycol conjugated L-asparaginase compared with biweekly dosing produces superior induction remission rates in childhood relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a pediatric oncology group study , 2000 .

[54]  M. Schrappe,et al.  Pegylated asparaginase (OncasparTM) in children with ALL: drug monitoring in reinduction according to the ALL/NHL‐BFM 95 protocols , 2000, British journal of haematology.

[55]  M. Relling,et al.  Hypersensitivity or development of antibodies to asparaginase does not impact treatment outcome of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[56]  H. Müller,et al.  Use of L-asparaginase in childhood ALL. , 1998, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[57]  H. Sather,et al.  Augmented post-induction therapy for children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia and a slow response to initial therapy. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[58]  T. Onuma,et al.  Amino acid requirements in vitro of human leukemic cells. , 1971, Cancer research.

[59]  E. Frei,et al.  L-asparagine requirement and the effect of L-asparaginase on the normal and leukemic human bone marrow. , 1970, Cancer research.

[60]  J. Broome EVIDENCE THAT THE L-ASPARAGINASE OF GUINEA PIG SERUM IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS ANTILYMPHOMA EFFECTS , 1963, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[61]  G. A. Fischer,et al.  The requirement for L-asparagine of mouse leukemia cells L5178Y in culture. , 1961, Cancer research.

[62]  R. E. Neuman,et al.  Dual requirement of Walker carcinosarcoma 256 in vitro for asparagine and glutamine. , 1956, Science.