Formulation of a unified constitutive model for clays and sands

This paper presents a new generalized effective stress model, referred to as MIT-S1, which is capable of predicting the rate independent, effective stress–strain–strength behaviour of uncemented soils over a wide range of confining pressures and densities. Freshly deposited sand specimens compressed from different initial formation densities approach a unique condition at high stress levels, referred to as the limiting compression curve (LCC), which is linear in a double logarithmic void ratio, e, mean effective stress space, p′. The model describes irrecoverable, plastic strains which develop throughout first loading using a simple four-parameter elasto-plastic model. The shear stiffness and strength properties of sands in the LCC regime can be normalized by the effective confining pressure and hence can be unified qualitatively, with the well-known behaviour of clays that are normally consolidated from a slurry condition along the virgin consolidation line (VCL). At lower confining pressures, the model characterizes the effects of formation density and fabric on the shear behaviour of sands through a number of key features: (a) void ratio is treated as a separate state variable in the incrementally linearized elasto-plastic formulation: (b) kinematic hardening describing the evolution of anisotropic stress–strain properties: (c) an aperture hardening function controls dilation as a function of ‘formation density’; and (d) the use of a single lemniscate-shaped yield surface with non-associated flow. These features enable the model to describe characteristic transitions from dilative to contractive shear response of sands as the confining pressure increases. This paper summarizes the procedures used to select input parameters for clays and sands, while a companion paper compares model predictions with measured data to illustrate the model capability for describing the shear behaviour of clays and sands. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  N. Miura,et al.  Stress-strain characteristics of sand in a particle-crushing region , 1984 .

[2]  Hidekazu Murata,et al.  YIELD CHARACTERISTICS OF ANISOTROPICALLY CONSOLIDATED SAND UNDER LOW AND HIGH STRESSES , 1991 .

[3]  Gholamreza Mesri,et al.  The coefficient of earth pressure at rest , 1993 .

[4]  Ken Been,et al.  A STATE PARAMETER FOR SANDS , 1985 .

[5]  Guy T. Houlsby,et al.  THE USE OF A VARIABLE SHEAR MODULUS IN ELASTIC-PLASTIC MODELS FOR CLAYS , 1985 .

[6]  Kandiah Sribalaskandarajah,et al.  Simple Double‐Hardening Model for geomaterials , 1992 .

[7]  M. Bolton.  THE STRENGTH AND DILATANCY OF SANDS , 1986 .

[8]  D. W. Hight,et al.  UNDRAINED BEHAVIOUR OF NATURAL AND MODEL CLAYEY SANDS , 1991 .

[9]  Dinesh R. Katti,et al.  Modeling and Testing of Cohesive Soil Using Disturbed-State Concept , 1995 .

[10]  T. Hueckel,et al.  Some hysteresis effects of the behaviour of geologic media , 1979 .

[11]  Hidekazu Murata,et al.  A Stress-Strain Relationship for Anisotropically Consolidated Sand over a Wide Stress Region , 1991 .

[12]  Mike Jefferies,et al.  NOR-SAND: A SIMPLE CRITICAL STATE MODEL FOR SAND , 1993 .

[13]  Chandrakant S. Desai,et al.  A hierarchical approach for constitutive modelling of geologic materials , 1986 .

[14]  B. K. Menzies,et al.  Inherent anisotropy in a sand , 1972 .

[15]  Ken Been,et al.  The critical state of sands , 1991 .

[16]  Teruo Nakai,et al.  STRESS-DEFORMATION AND STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL UNDER THREE DIFFERENT PRINCIPAL STRESSES , 1974 .

[17]  Jean H. Prevost,et al.  PLASTICITY THEORY FOR SOIL STRESS-STRAIN BEHAVIOR , 1978 .

[18]  Renato Lancellotta,et al.  New correlations of penetration tests for design practice : Proc 1st International Symposium on Penetration Testing, ISOPT-1, Orlando, 20–24 March 1988V1, P263–296. Rotterdam: A A Balkema, 1988 , 1990 .

[19]  Iraj Farhoomand,et al.  Compressibility and crushing of granular soil in anisotropic triaxial compression , 1967 .

[20]  Jerry A. Yamamuro,et al.  Undrained Sand Behavior in Axisymmetric Tests at High Pressures , 1996 .

[21]  Masanobu Oda,et al.  THE MECHANISM OF FABRIC CHANGES DURING COMPRESSIONAL DEFORMATION OF SAND , 1972 .

[22]  Richard B. Nelson,et al.  Modelling the elastic behaviour of granular materials , 1987 .

[23]  Richard J. Jardine,et al.  The measurement of soil stiffness in the triaxial apparatus , 1984 .

[24]  Chandrakant S. Desai,et al.  Constitutive model for cyclic behavior of clays. I: Theory , 1993 .

[25]  K. Ishihara.  Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes. , 1993 .

[26]  Yannis F. Dafalias,et al.  Unified critical-state bounding-surface plasticity model for soil , 1994 .

[27]  Fumio Tatsuoka,et al.  Measurements of elastic properties of geomaterials in laboratory compression tests , 1994 .

[28]  R. Nova,et al.  A constitutive model for sand in triaxial compression , 1979 .

[29]  P. A. Vermeer,et al.  A double hardening model for sand , 1978 .

[30]  Andrew J. Whittle,et al.  Analysis of Deep Excavation in Boston , 1993 .

[31]  Matthew Richard Coop,et al.  THE BEHAVIOUR OF GRANULAR SOILS AT ELEVATED STRESSES , 1993 .

[32]  Dimitrios Kolymbas,et al.  Hypoplastic constitutive equation with internal variables , 1995 .

[33]  Andrew J. Whittle,et al.  Compression model for cohesionless soils , 1995 .

[34]  Andrew J. Whittle,et al.  Formulation of MIT-E3 constitutive model for overconsolidated clays , 1994 .

[35]  Andrew J. Whittle,et al.  Model Prediction of Anisotropic Behavior of Boston Blue Clay , 1994 .

[36]  Poul V. Lade,et al.  Elasto-plastic stress-strain theory for cohesionless soil with curved yield surfaces , 1977 .

[37]  Renato Lancellotta,et al.  Stiffness of Toyoura Sand at Small and Intermediate Strain , 1994 .