Slope-Based Stochastic Resonance: How Noise Enables Phasic Neurons to Encode Slow Signals

Fundamental properties of phasic firing neurons are usually characterized in a noise-free condition. In the absence of noise, phasic neurons exhibit Class 3 excitability, which is a lack of repetitive firing to steady current injections. For time-varying inputs, phasic neurons are band-pass filters or slope detectors, because they do not respond to inputs containing exclusively low frequencies or shallow slopes. However, we show that in noisy conditions, response properties of phasic neuron models are distinctly altered. Noise enables a phasic model to encode low-frequency inputs that are outside of the response range of the associated deterministic model. Interestingly, this seemingly stochastic-resonance (SR) like effect differs significantly from the classical SR behavior of spiking systems in both the signal-to-noise ratio and the temporal response pattern. Instead of being most sensitive to the peak of a subthreshold signal, as is typical in a classical SR system, phasic models are most sensitive to the signal's rising and falling phases where the slopes are steep. This finding is consistent with the fact that there is not an absolute input threshold in terms of amplitude; rather, a response threshold is more properly defined as a stimulus slope/frequency. We call the encoding of low-frequency signals with noise by phasic models a slope-based SR, because noise can lower or diminish the slope threshold for ramp stimuli. We demonstrate here similar behaviors in three mechanistic models with Class 3 excitability in the presence of slow-varying noise and we suggest that the slope-based SR is a fundamental behavior associated with general phasic properties rather than with a particular biological mechanism.

[1]  N. Bibikov,et al.  Addition of noise enhances neural synchrony to amplitude-modulated sounds in the frog’s midbrain , 2002, Hearing Research.

[2]  J. Rinzel,et al.  Sodium along with low-threshold potassium currents enhance coincidence detection of subthreshold noisy signals in MSO neurons. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  J. Rinzel,et al.  Enhancement of Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Phase Locking for Small Inputs by a Low-Threshold Outward Current in Auditory Neurons , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  L. Carney,et al.  A Model for Interaural Time Difference Sensitivity in the Medial Superior Olive: Interaction of Excitatory and Inhibitory Synaptic Inputs, Channel Dynamics, and Cellular Morphology , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  H. Colburn,et al.  Models of Brainstem Responses to Bilateral Electrical Stimulation , 2009, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[6]  A. Hodgkin The local electric changes associated with repetitive action in a non‐medullated axon , 1948, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  I. Forsythe,et al.  Two voltage-dependent K+ conductances with complementary functions in postsynaptic integration at a central auditory synapse , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  John P. Miller,et al.  Broadband neural encoding in the cricket cereal sensory system enhanced by stochastic resonance , 1996, Nature.

[9]  D. Contreras,et al.  Stimulus-Dependent Changes in Spike Threshold Enhance Feature Selectivity in Rat Barrel Cortex Neurons , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Derek Abbott,et al.  What Is Stochastic Resonance? Definitions, Misconceptions, Debates, and Its Relevance to Biology , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  P. D. Wilson,et al.  Receptive field properties and latencies of cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the North American opossum (Didelphis virginiana). , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Adrienne L. Fairhall,et al.  Two Computational Regimes of a Single-Compartment Neuron Separated by a Planar Boundary in Conductance Space , 2007, Neural Computation.

[13]  Nicolas Vibert,et al.  Differential Intrinsic Response Dynamics Determine Synaptic Signal Processing in Frog Vestibular Neurons , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  NOISE INDUCED LIMIT CYCLES OF THE BONHOEFFER-VAN DER POL MODEL OF NEURAL PULSES. , 1985 .

[15]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  J. Rinzel,et al.  Subthreshold K+ channel dynamics interact with stimulus spectrum to influence temporal coding in an auditory brain stem model. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  A. Feng,et al.  Wide‐ranging frequency preferences of auditory midbrain neurons: Roles of membrane time constant and synaptic properties , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[18]  Y. Koninck,et al.  Four cell types with distinctive membrane properties and morphologies in lamina I of the spinal dorsal horn of the adult rat , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  J. Rinzel,et al.  Well-timed, brief inhibition can promote spiking: postinhibitory facilitation. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Frank Moss,et al.  Noise in human muscle spindles , 1996, Nature.

[21]  L. Trussell,et al.  Characterization of outward currents in neurons of the avian nucleus magnocellularis. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Gregoire Nicolis,et al.  Stochastic resonance , 2007, Scholarpedia.

[23]  K. Schäfer,et al.  Oscillation and noise determine signal transduction in shark multimodal sensory cells , 1994, Nature.

[24]  C. Gray,et al.  Dynamic spike threshold reveals a mechanism for synaptic coincidence detection in cortical neurons in vivo. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience: The Geometry of Excitability and Bursting , 2006 .

[26]  J. Rothman,et al.  The roles potassium currents play in regulating the electrical activity of ventral cochlear nucleus neurons. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Higher-order stochastic resonance in a level-crossing detector , 1999 .

[28]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Biophysical Basis for Three Distinct Dynamical Mechanisms of Action Potential Initiation , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[29]  A. Longtin Stochastic resonance in neuron models , 1993 .

[30]  X. Yu,et al.  Studies with spike initiators: linearization by noise allows continuous signal modulation in neural networks , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  Frank Moss,et al.  Stochastic Resonance in an Electronic FitzHugh‐Nagumo Model a , 1993 .

[32]  Wiesenfeld,et al.  Theory of stochastic resonance. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[33]  Ulrich Ramacher,et al.  Temporal Sound Processing by Cochlear Nucleus Octopus Neurons , 2005, ICANN.

[34]  Cheng Ly,et al.  Divisive Gain Modulation with Dynamic Stimuli in Integrate-and-Fire Neurons , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[35]  David Paydarfar,et al.  A simple modification of the Hodgkin and Huxley equations explains type 3 excitability in squid giant axons , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[36]  Adrienne L. Fairhall,et al.  Sensitivity of firing rate to input fluctuations depends on time scale separation between fast and slow variables in single neurons , 2009, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[37]  Nace L. Golding,et al.  Posthearing Developmental Refinement of Temporal Processing in Principal Neurons of the Medial Superior Olive , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Brent Doiron,et al.  Noise-gated encoding of slow inputs by auditory brain stem neurons with a low-threshold K+ current. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  S. I. Nikitin,et al.  STOCHASTIC RESONANCE AT HIGHER HARMONICS IN MONOSTABLE SYSTEMS , 1997 .

[40]  L Schimansky-Geier,et al.  Analytical approach to the stochastic FitzHugh-Nagumo system and coherence resonance. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[41]  D. Oertel,et al.  Rate thresholds determine the precision of temporal integration in principal cells of the ventral cochlear nucleus , 2006, Hearing Research.

[42]  Kurt Wiesenfeld,et al.  Stochastic resonance and the benefits of noise: from ice ages to crayfish and SQUIDs , 1995, Nature.

[43]  P. Manis,et al.  Outward currents in isolated ventral cochlear nucleus neurons , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[44]  Jung,et al.  Stochastic resonance in optical bistable systems. , 1993, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[45]  Sean J. Slee,et al.  Diversity of Gain Modulation by Noise in Neocortical Neurons: Regulation by the Slow Afterhyperpolarization Conductance , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  Michael Rudolph,et al.  Extracting Information from the Power Spectrum of Synaptic Noise , 2004, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.