Some thoughts on the use of InSAR data to constrain models of surface deformation: Noise structure and data downsampling

Repeat-pass Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) provides spatially dense maps of surface deformation with potentially tens of millions of data points. Here we estimate the actual covariance structure of noise in InSAR data. We compare the results for several independent interferograms with a large ensemble of GPS observations of tropospheric delay and discuss how the common approaches used during processing of InSAR data affects the inferred covariance structure. Motivated by computational concerns associated with numerical modeling of deformation sources, we then combine the data-covariance information with the inherent resolution of an assumed source model to develop an efficient algorithm for spatially variable data resampling (or averaging). We illustrate these technical developments with two earthquake scenarios at different ends of the earthquake magnitude spectrum. For the larger events, our goal is to invert for the coseismic fault slip distribution. For smaller events, we infer the hypocenter location and moment. We compare the results of inversions using several different resampling algorithms, and we assess the importance of using the full noise covariance matrix.

[1]  S. Clifford.  Wave Propagation in a Turbulent Medium. , 1969 .

[2]  Richard M. Goldstein,et al.  Atmospheric limitations to repeat‐track radar interferometry , 1995 .

[3]  B. Kennett.  Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory, W. Menke, Academic Press, London xxii +260 pp., £34.00 , 1985 .

[4]  A.,et al.  Inverse Problems = Quest for Information , 2022 .

[5]  Robert L. Parker,et al.  UNDERSTANDING INVERSE THEORY x10066 , 1977 .

[6]  S. Jónsson,et al.  Modeling volcano and earthquake deformation from satellite radar interferometric observations , 2002 .

[7]  W. Menke.  Geophysical data analysis , 1984 .

[8]  P. Segall,et al.  Detection of a locked zone at depth on the Parkfield, California, segment of the San Andreas Fault , 1987 .

[9]  Paul A. Rosen,et al.  Co-seismic slip from the 1995 July 30 Mw= 8.1 Antofagasta, Chile, earthquake as constrained by InSAR and GPS observations , 2002 .

[10]  J. Avouac,et al.  Deformation due to the 17 August 1999 Izmit, Turkey, earthquake measured from SPOT images , 2002 .

[11]  P. Segall,et al.  Earthquake deformation cycle on the San Andreas Fault near Parkfield, California , 1987 .

[12]  H. Zebker,et al.  Fault Slip Distribution of the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake, Estimated from Satellite Radar and GPS Measurements , 2002 .

[13]  R. Parker.  Understanding Inverse Theory , 1977 .

[14]  R. A. Silverman,et al.  Wave Propagation in a Turbulent Medium , 1961 .

[15]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  Integrated satellite interferometry: Tropospheric noise, GPS estimates and implications for interferometric synthetic aperture radar products , 1998 .

[16]  L. Rivera,et al.  Coseismic Deformation from the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake as Inferred from InSAR and GPS Observations , 2002 .

[17]  Rowena B. Lohman,et al.  Location and mechanism of the Little Skull Mountain earthquake as constrained by satellite radar interferometry and seismic waveform modeling , 2002 .

[18]  M. Sambridge.  Geophysical inversion with a neighbourhood algorithm—I. Searching a parameter space , 1999 .

[19]  T. Wright,et al.  Toward mapping surface deformation in three dimensions using InSAR , 2004 .

[20]  Frank H. Webb,et al.  Neutral atmospheric delay in interferometric synthetic aperture radar applications: Statistical description and mitigation , 2003 .

[21]  W. Menke.  Geophysical data analysis : discrete inverse theory , 1984 .

[22]  P. Rosen,et al.  Atmospheric effects in interferometric synthetic aperture radar surface deformation and topographic maps , 1997 .

[23]  Zhong Lu,et al.  Source model for the Mw 6.7, 23 October 2002, Nenana Mountain Earthquake (Alaska) from InSAR , 2003 .

[24]  R. Hanssen.  Radar Interferometry: Data Interpretation and Error Analysis , 2001 .