Effects of habitat quality and size on extinction in experimental populations

Stochastic population theory makes clear predictions about the effects of reproductive potential and carrying capacity on characteristic time-scales of extinction. At the same time, the effects of habitat size and quality on reproduction and regulation have been hotly debated. To trace the causal relationships among these factors, we looked at the effects of habitat size and quality on extinction time in experimental populations of Daphnia magna. Replicate model systems representative of a broad-spectrum consumer foraging on a continuously supplied resource were established under crossed treatments of habitat size (two levels) and habitat quality (three levels) and monitored until eventual extinction of all populations. Using statistically derived estimates of key parameters, we related experimental treatments to persistence time through their effect on carrying capacity and the population growth rate. We found that carrying capacity and the intrinsic rate of increase were each influenced similarly by habitat size and quality, and that carrying capacity and the intrinsic rate of increase were in turn both correlated with time to population extinction. We expected habitat quality to have a greater influence on extinction. However, owing to an unexpected effect of habitat size on reproductive potential, habitat size and quality were similarly important for population persistence. These results support the idea that improving the population growth rate or carrying capacity will reduce extinction risk and demonstrate that both are possible by improving habitat quality or increasing habitat size.

[1]  Jared M. Diamond,et al.  THE ISLAND DILEMMA: LESSONS OF MODERN BIOGEOGRAPHIC STUDIES FOR THE DESIGN OF NATURAL RESERVES , 1975 .

[2]  D. Hik,et al.  Influence of habitat quality, patch size and connectivity on colonization and extinction dynamics of collared pikas Ochotona collaris , 2004 .

[3]  John M. Drake,et al.  Effects of environmental variation on extinction and establishment , 2004 .

[4]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Comparing risk factors for population extinction. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  P. Turchin,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF FRAGMENTATION AND LOSS OF HABITAT WITH ORYZAEPHILUS SURINAMENSIS , 2003 .

[6]  D. Lodge,et al.  Propagule pressure and persistence in experimental populations , 2005, Biology Letters.

[7]  Anders Hobæk,et al.  Sexual reproduction in Daphnia magna requires three stimuli , 1992 .

[8]  Chris Klok,et al.  Effects of habitat size and quality on equilibrium density and extinction time of Sorex araneus populations , 1998 .

[9]  M. Patten,et al.  Habitat fragmentation, rapid evolution and population persistence , 2005 .

[10]  R. Lande,et al.  Stochastic Population Dynamics in Ecology and Conservation , 2003 .

[11]  Floyd B. Hanson,et al.  Persistence in density dependent stochastic populations , 1981 .

[12]  R. Dennis,et al.  Patch occupancy in Coenonympha tullia (Muller, 1764) (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae): habitat quality matters as much as patch size and isolation , 1997, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[13]  E. Fleishman,et al.  Assessing the Roles of Patch Quality, Area, and Isolation in Predicting Metapopulation Dynamics , 2002 .

[14]  R. Costantino,et al.  Experimental support of the scaling rule for demographic stochasticity. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[15]  W. Lampert Daphnia: Model herbivore, predator and prey , 2006 .

[16]  Marc Lipsitch,et al.  The Effect of Parasites on Host Population Density and Extinction: Experimental Epidemiology with Daphnia and Six Microparasites , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[17]  J. Bengtsson,et al.  Predicting extinctions: interspecific competition, predation and population variability in experimental Daphnia populations , 1995, Oecologia.

[18]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. , 2000, Science.

[19]  G. Belovsky,et al.  Experimental studies of extinction dynamics , 1999, Science.

[20]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[21]  P. Chesson,et al.  Environmental Variability Promotes Coexistence in Lottery Competitive Systems , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[22]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Spatial Structure and Population Extinction: A Study with Drosophila Flies , 1989 .

[23]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  Refuge Design and Island Biogeographic Theory: Effects of Fragmentation , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[24]  Stuart L. Pimm,et al.  On the Risk of Extinction , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[25]  John M Drake,et al.  Environmental Variation, Stochastic Extinction, and Competitive Coexistence , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[26]  J. Ehrlén,et al.  Influence of habitat quantity, quality and isolation on the distribution and abundance of two epiphytic lichens , 2003 .

[27]  Michael E. Gilpin,et al.  Drosophila Population Dynamics: Chaos and Extinction , 1987 .

[28]  N. Britton,et al.  Army ant population dynamics: the effects of habitat quality and reserve size on population size and time to extinction , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.