Voluntary Associations and Tolerance: An Ambiguous Relationship

In the debate on social capital, it is usually assumed that membership in voluntary associations is highly beneficial for the formation of civic values among the association’s affiliates. Despite these theoretical expectations, comparative studies have so far found only a weak statistical relationship between associational involvement and tolerance in Western democracies and a nonsignificant or even negative relationship in the case of Eastern and Central European countries. In this article, the author further investigates the negative relationship between associational involvement and attitudes of social and political tolerance, the “dark side” of social capital. The author shows that when members of voluntary associations build particularized trust rather than generalized trust, this decreases their already low levels of social tolerance. Such situations are especially common in the countries of Eastern and Central Europe. Associational involvement also has negative effects on political tolerance. Associations are social contexts within which processes of interpersonal influence and political mobilization take place. This results in the reinforcement of civic as well as uncivic orientations of associational members.

[1]  Lincoln Quillian Group Threat and Regional Change in Attitudes Toward African-Americans , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  Sigrid Rossteutscher Advocate or Reflection? Associations and Political Culture , 2002 .

[3]  Sheri Berman,et al.  Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic , 1997, World Politics.

[4]  S. Stouffer,et al.  Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties. , 1956 .

[5]  Bas Denters,et al.  Norms of good citizenship , 2007 .

[6]  Jan E. Leighley Group Membership and the Mobilization of Political Participation , 1996, The Journal of Politics.

[7]  Group Involvement and Democratic Orientations: Social Capital in the Postelection Context , 2001 .

[8]  E. Uslaner The Moral Foundations of Trust , 2002 .

[9]  John L. Sullivan,et al.  Political Tolerance and American Democracy , 1982 .

[10]  L. Ayala Trained for Democracy:The Differing Effects of Voluntary and Involuntary Organizations on Political Participation , 2000 .

[11]  C. Calhoun Civil society and the public sphere , 1993 .

[12]  J. Gibson Do Strong Group Identities Fuel Intolerance? Evidence From the South African Case , 2006 .

[13]  R. Putnam The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life , 1993 .

[14]  Pamela Paxton,et al.  In Principle and in Practice: Learning Political Tolerance in Eastern and Western Europe , 2007 .

[15]  S. Damico,et al.  Patterns of Political Trust and Mistrust: Three Moments in the Lives of Democratic Citizens , 2000, Polity.

[16]  Caroline Hodges Persell,et al.  Civil Society, Economic Distress, and Social Tolerance , 2001 .

[17]  Kenneth Newton,et al.  Trust in people, confidence in political institutions and satisfaction with democracy , 2007 .

[18]  Margaret Levi,et al.  Social and Unsocial Capital: A Review Essay of Robert Putnam's Making Democracy Work , 1996 .

[19]  Jan W. van Deth,et al.  Citizenship and involvement in European Democracies : A Comparative Analysis , 2007 .

[20]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  The Workplace as a Context for Cross-Cutting Political Discourse , 2006, The Journal of Politics.

[21]  R. Putnam Democracies in flux : the evolution of social capital in contemporary society , 2003 .

[22]  John Keane Structural Transformations of the Public Sphere , 2020, The Information Society Reader.

[23]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics , 1996 .

[24]  J. Crété,et al.  Tolerance, protest and democratic transition: Survey evidence from 13 post‐communist countries , 2004 .

[25]  Jan W. van Deth,et al.  Social Capital and European Democracy , 1999 .

[26]  T. Skocpol,et al.  “Advocates without Members: The Recent Transformation of American Civic Life” , 1999 .

[27]  D. Green,et al.  Principled Tolerance and the American Mass Public , 1989, British Journal of Political Science.

[28]  R. Wyer,et al.  The Cognitive and Affective Bases of Political Tolerance Judgments , 1991 .

[29]  R. Koshar From Stammtisch to Party: Nazi Joiners and the Contradictions of Grass Roots Fascism in Weimar Germany , 1987, The Journal of Modern History.

[30]  Donna Bahry,et al.  Tolerance, Transition, and Support for Civil Liberties in Russia , 1997 .

[31]  H. McClosky,et al.  Consensus and Ideology in American Politics , 1964, American Political Science Review.

[32]  Joel Waldfogel,et al.  Introduction , 2010, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[33]  M. Joslyn,et al.  The Extensiveness of Group Membership and Social Capital: The Impact on Political Tolerance Attitudes , 2002 .

[34]  L. Smith-Lovin,et al.  Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. , 1987 .

[35]  S. Verba,et al.  The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, An Analytic Study , 1964 .

[36]  Pamela Paxton Social Capital and Democracy: An Interdependent Relationship , 2002, American Sociological Review.

[37]  S. Verba,et al.  The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations , 1964 .

[38]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks , 2005 .

[39]  Diana C. Mutz Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice , 2002, American Political Science Review.

[40]  W. Rahn,et al.  Individual-Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital , 1997 .

[41]  M. Peffley,et al.  Democratization and Political Tolerance in Seventeen Countries: A Multi-level Model of Democratic Learning , 2003 .

[42]  Mark E. Warren,et al.  Democracy and Association , 2000 .

[43]  R. Rose Rethinking Civil Society: Postcommunism and the Problem of Trust , 2008 .