Risk-based cooperative scheduling of demand response and electric vehicle aggregators

This paper proposes a new cooperative scheduling framework for demand response aggregators (DRAs) and electric vehicle aggregators (EVAs) in a day-ahead market. The proposed model implements the information-gap decision theory (IGDT) to optimize the scheduling problem of the aggregators, which guarantees obtaining the predetermined profit by the aggregators. In the proposed model, the driving pattern of electric vehicle owners and the uncertainty of day-ahead prices are simulated via scenario-based and a bi-level IGDT based methods, respectively. The DR aggregator provides DR from two demand side management programs including time-of-use (TOU) and reward-based DR. Then, the obtained DR is offered into day-ahead markets. Furthermore, the EVA not only meet the EV owners’ demand economically, but also participates in the day-ahead mark while willing to set DR contracts with the DR aggregator. The objective function is to maximize the total profit of DR and EV aggregators perusing two different strategies to face with price uncertainty, i.e., risk-seeker strategy and risk-averse strategy. The proposed plan is formulated in a risk-based approach and its validity is evaluated on a case study with realistic data of electricity markets.

[1]  Fuquan Zhao,et al.  The correlated impacts of fuel consumption improvements and vehicle electrification on vehicle greenhouse gas emissions in China , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[2]  Du Zhili,et al.  Development path of electric vehicles in China under environmental and energy security constraints , 2019, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[3]  Ali Elkamel,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis of V2G Implementation in Distribution Networks Considering PEVs Battery Degradation , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[4]  Dong-Min Kim,et al.  Design of Emergency Demand Response Program Using Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[5]  Tapan Kumar Saha,et al.  A new trading framework for demand response aggregators , 2014, 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference & Exposition.

[6]  Wei Wei,et al.  Energy Pricing and Dispatch for Smart Grid Retailers Under Demand Response and Market Price Uncertainty , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[7]  Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo,et al.  Application of information gap decision theory in practical energy problems: A comprehensive review , 2019, Applied Energy.

[8]  Long Bao Le,et al.  Dynamic Pricing Design for Demand Response Integration in Power Distribution Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  Masood Parvania,et al.  Demand Response Scheduling by Stochastic SCUC , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[10]  Ming Wei A top-down market model for demand response procurement via aggregators , 2015, 2015 IEEE Eindhoven PowerTech.

[11]  David Infield,et al.  Using Electric Vehicle Fleet as Responsive Demand for Power System Frequency Support , 2013, 2013 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC).

[12]  Vincent W. S. Wong,et al.  An approximate dynamic programming approach for coordinated charging control at vehicle-to-grid aggregator , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).

[13]  Jian Zhao,et al.  Risk-Based Day-Ahead Scheduling of Electric Vehicle Aggregator Using Information Gap Decision Theory , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[14]  Habib Allah Aalami,et al.  Regulation of market clearing price based on nonlinear models of demand bidding and emergency demand response programs , 2016 .

[15]  Y. Ben-Haim Information-gap decision theory : decisions under severe uncertainty , 2001 .

[16]  K. Schneider,et al.  Impact assessment of plug-in hybrid vehicles on pacific northwest distribution systems , 2008, 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting - Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century.

[17]  Manijeh Alipour,et al.  Stochastic scheduling of aggregators of plug-in electric vehicles for participation in energy and ancillary service markets , 2017 .

[18]  Manuel A. Matos,et al.  Global against divided optimization for the participation of an EV aggregator in the day-ahead electricity market. Part I: Theory , 2013 .

[19]  Q. Ai,et al.  Agent-based simulation for symmetric electricity market considering price-based demand response , 2017 .

[20]  Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo,et al.  Optimal scheduling of plug-in electric vehicles and renewable micro-grid in energy and reserve markets considering demand response program , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[21]  Ning Lu,et al.  Cooling Devices in Demand Response: A Comparison of Control Methods , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[22]  M. Shafie‐khah,et al.  A bottom-up approach for demand response aggregators’ participation in electricity markets , 2017 .

[23]  Farhad Samadi Gazijahani,et al.  Decentralized trading of plug-in electric vehicle aggregation agents for optimal energy management of smart renewable penetrated microgrids with the aim of CO2 emission reduction , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[24]  Qie Sun,et al.  The impact of electric vehicle penetration and charging patterns on the management of energy hub – A multi-agent system simulation , 2018, Applied Energy.

[25]  Fangxing Li,et al.  Coupon-Based Demand Response Considering Wind Power Uncertainty: A Strategic Bidding Model for Load Serving Entities , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[26]  Guido Carpinelli,et al.  Exponential weighted method and a compromise programming method for multi-objective operation of plug-in vehicle aggregators in microgrids , 2014 .

[27]  N. Amjady,et al.  Risk-Constrained Bidding and Offering Strategy for a Merchant Compressed Air Energy Storage Plant , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[28]  Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo,et al.  Short-term Scheduling of Future Distribution Network in High Penetration of Electric Vehicles in Deregulated Energy Market , 2018 .

[29]  Daryoosh Nazarpour,et al.  Optimal performance of electric vehicles parking lot considering environmental issue , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[30]  Sung-Kwan Joo,et al.  Stochastic charging coordination method for electric vehicle (EV) aggregator considering uncertainty in EV departures , 2016 .

[31]  Nikos D. Hatziargyriou,et al.  Charging control model for Electric Vehicle Supplier Aggregator , 2012, 2012 3rd IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT Europe).

[32]  Kevin P. Schneider,et al.  Impacts Assessment of Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles on Electric Utilities and Regional US Power Grids: Part 1: Technical Analysis , 2007 .

[33]  M. Bongaerts,et al.  Optimizing electricity consumption of buildings in a microgrid through demand response , 2017, 2017 IEEE Manchester PowerTech.

[34]  Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo,et al.  Self-Scheduling of Demand Response Aggregators in Short-Term Markets Based on Information Gap Decision Theory , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[35]  Kevin Tomsovic,et al.  A full demand response model in co-optimized energy and reserve market , 2014 .

[36]  Joško Deur,et al.  Dynamic Programming-based Optimisation of Charging an Electric Vehicle Fleet System Represented by an Aggregate Battery Model , 2015 .

[37]  Kumar Raja Gadham,et al.  Importance of social welfare point for the analysis of demand response , 2016, 2016 IEEE First International Conference on Control, Measurement and Instrumentation (CMI).