One Hidden Object, Two Spatial Codes: Young Children's Use of Relational and Vector Coding

An important characteristic of mature spatial cognition is the ability to encode spatial locations in terms of relations among landmarks as well as in terms of vectors that include distance and direction. In this study, we examined children's use of the relation middle to code the location of a hidden toy, using a procedure adapted from prior work on spatial cognition in gerbils (Collett, Cartwright, & Smith, 1986). Children of 4 and 5 years searched for a hidden toy in a large-scale environment. They were trained to find the toy with either 2 or 1 landmark present. On subsequent trials we altered the number and locations of the landmarks to determine how children represented the location of the toy. With 2 landmarks present during the initial training trial, the children coded both the middle location and the distance and direction from the toy to the landmarks. With 1 landmark present during the training trial, the children coded the location in terms of distance and direction to the single landmark. Our results shed light on seemingly inconsistent prior findings in both human and nonhuman species and indicate that both relational and vector coding are present in young children.

[1]  Sarah S. Chance,et al.  Spatial Updating of Self-Position and Orientation During Real, Imagined, and Virtual Locomotion , 1998 .

[2]  永福 智志.  The Organization of Learning , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  E. Spelke,et al.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation , 1996, Cognition.

[4]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.

[5]  D. Gentner,et al.  Relational language and relational thought , 2002 .

[6]  W. Overman,et al.  Ontogeny of place learning in children as measured in the radial arm maze, Morris search task, and open field task. , 1996, Behavioral neuroscience.

[7]  Susan C. Levine,et al.  Quantitative Development in Infancy and Early Childhood , 2002 .

[8]  D. Schacter,et al.  The Evolution of Multiple Memory Systems , 1987 .

[9]  C. Mervis,et al.  Global Spatial Organization by Individuals with Williams Syndrome , 1999 .

[10]  D. Gentner,et al.  Language and the career of similarity. , 1991 .

[11]  P. Quinn,et al.  Formation of a categorical representation for the spatial relation between by 6- to 7-month-old infants , 1999 .

[12]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Spatial Mapping in Preschoolers: Close Comparisons Facilitate Far Mappings , 2001 .

[13]  K. Lohmann,et al.  Regional Magnetic Fields as Navigational Markers for Sea Turtles , 2001, Science.

[14]  D. Gentner,et al.  Comparison and Categorization in the Development of Relational Similarity , 1996 .

[15]  D. Uttal,et al.  Connecting the dots: children's use of a systematic figure to facilitate mapping and search. , 2001, Developmental psychology.

[16]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Pigeons encode relative geometry. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[17]  L. Hedges,et al.  Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location. , 1991, Psychological review.

[18]  A. Kamil,et al.  Geometric rule learning by Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[19]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Searching for the center: spatial cognition in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus). , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[20]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Strategies in landmark use by children, adults, and marmoset monkeys , 2004 .

[21]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Spatial Scaling in Young Children , 1999 .

[22]  Sean Duffy,et al.  Infants and Toddlers Discriminate Amount: Are They Measuring? , 2002, Psychological science.

[23]  J. Steven Reznick,et al.  Early Development of Executive Function: A Problem-Solving Framework , 1997 .

[24]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Duck or rabbit? Reversing ambiguous figures and understanding ambiguous representations. , 2001 .

[25]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Making Space: The Development of Spatial Representation and Reasoning , 2000 .

[26]  Nora S. Newcombe,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF SPATIAL LOCATION CODING: PLACE LEARNING AND DEAD RECKONING IN THE SECOND AND THIRD YEARS , 1998 .

[27]  E. Bushnell,et al.  The spatial coding strategies of one-year-old infants in a locomotor search task. , 1995, Child development.

[28]  Jodie M. Plumert,et al.  Flexibility in children's use of spatial and categorical organizational strategies in recall , 1994 .

[29]  J. L. Gould,et al.  Honey Bee Orientation: A Backup System for Cloudy Days , 1981, Science.

[30]  Alan C. Kamil,et al.  The seed-storing corvid Clark's nutcracker learns geometric relationships among landmarks , 1997, Nature.

[31]  T. S. Collett,et al.  Landmark learning and visuo-spatial memories in gerbils , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[32]  E. Spelke,et al.  Updating egocentric representations in human navigation , 2000, Cognition.

[33]  David R. Olson,et al.  Representation and Communication in Development@@@Language, Literacy, and Cognitive Development: The Development and Consequences of Symbolic Communication , 2003 .

[34]  Anne R. Schutte,et al.  Testing the dynamic field theory: working memory for locations becomes more spatially precise over development. , 2003, Child development.

[35]  Paul C Quinn,et al.  Development of an abstract category representation for the spatial relation between in 6- to 10-month-old infants. , 2003, Developmental psychology.

[36]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish , 2002, Cognition.

[37]  E. Spelke,et al.  Children's use of geometry and landmarks to reorient in an open space , 2001, Cognition.