Confidence region of least squares solution for single-arc observations

The total number of active satellites, rocket bodies, and debris larger than 10 cm is currently about 20,000. Considering all resident space objects larger than 1 cm this rises to an estimated minimum of 500,000 objects. Latest generation sensor networks will be able to detect small-size objects, producing millions of observations per day. Due to observability constraints it is likely that long gaps between observations will occur for small objects. This requires to determine the space object (SO) orbit and to accurately describe the associated uncertainty when observations are acquired on a single arc. The aim of this work is to revisit the classical least squares method taking advantage of the high order Taylor expansions enabled by differential algebra. In particular, the high order expansion of the residuals with respect to the state is used to implement an arbitrary order least squares solver, avoiding the typical approximations of differential correction methods. In addition, the same expansions are used to accurately characterize the confidence region of the solution, going beyond the classical Gaussian distributions. The properties and performances of the proposed method are discussed using optical observations of objects in LEO, HEO, and GEO.

[1]  Giacomo Tommei,et al.  Multiple solutions for asteroid orbits: Computational procedure and applications , 2005 .

[2]  Z. Wan,et al.  Geometry of Matrices: In Memory of Professor L K Hua (1910 – 1985) , 1996 .

[3]  H. Sorenson Least-squares estimation: from Gauss to Kalman , 1970, IEEE Spectrum.

[4]  Andrea Milani,et al.  The Asteroid Identification Problem: I. Recovery of Lost Asteroids☆ , 1999 .

[5]  Andrej Pázman,et al.  Nonlinear Regression , 2019, Handbook of Regression Analysis With Applications in R.

[6]  Marcus J. Holzinger,et al.  Incorporating Uncertainty in Admissible Regions for Uncorrelated Detections , 2014 .

[7]  Oliver Montenbruck,et al.  Satellite Orbits: Models, Methods and Applications , 2000 .

[8]  D. Kessler,et al.  Collision frequency of artificial satellites: The creation of a debris belt , 1978 .

[9]  Richard Linares,et al.  Spacecraft Uncertainty Propagation Using Gaussian Mixture Models and Polynomial Chaos Expansions , 2016 .

[10]  Chris Sabol,et al.  Uncertain Lambert Problem , 2015 .

[11]  P. W. Hawkes,et al.  Modern map methods in particle beam physics , 1999 .

[12]  H. Klinkrad Space Debris: Models and Risk Analysis , 2006 .

[13]  A. Jazwinski Stochastic Processes and Filtering Theory , 1970 .

[14]  Kyle J. DeMars,et al.  Probabilistic Initial Orbit Determination Using Gaussian Mixture Models , 2013 .

[15]  Renato Zanetti,et al.  Dealing with uncertainties in angles-only initial orbit determination , 2016 .

[16]  K. Fujimoto New Methods in Optical Track Association and Uncertainty Mapping of Earth-Orbiting Objects , 2013 .

[17]  Jared M. Maruskin,et al.  Correlation of Optical Observations of Objects in Earth Orbit , 2009 .

[18]  A. Milani,et al.  Theory of Orbit Determination , 2009 .

[19]  D. Simon Optimal State Estimation: Kalman, H Infinity, and Nonlinear Approaches , 2006 .

[20]  A. Milani,et al.  Orbit Determination with Very Short Arcs. II Identifications , 2005 .

[21]  R. Fisher 001: On an Absolute Criterion for Fitting Frequency Curves. , 1912 .

[22]  A. Milani,et al.  Orbit determination with very short arcs. I admissible regions , 2004 .

[23]  Andrea Milani,et al.  From Astrometry to Celestial Mechanics: Orbit Determination with Very Short Arcs , 2005 .

[24]  Martin Berz,et al.  The method of power series tracking for the mathematical description of beam dynamics , 1987 .

[25]  D. Vallado Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications , 1997 .