MAppleT: simulation of apple tree development using mixed stochastic and biomechanical models.

Construction of tree architectural databases over years is time consuming and cannot easily capture event dynamics, especially when both tree topology and geometry are considered. The present project aimed to bring together models of topology and geometry in a single simulation such that the architecture of an apple tree may emerge from process interactions. This integration was performed using L-systems. A mixed approach was developed based on stochastic models to simulate plant topology and mechanistic model for the geometry. The succession of growth units (GUs) along axes and their branching structure were jointly modelled by a hierarchical hidden Markov model. A biomechanical model, derived from previous studies, was used to calculate stem form at the metamer scale, taking into account the intra-year dynamics of primary, secondary and fruit growth. Outputs consist of 3-D mock-ups - geometric models representing the progression of tree form over time. To asses these models, a sensitivity analysis was performed and descriptors were compared between simulated and digitised trees, including the total number of GUs in the entire tree, descriptors of shoot geometry (basal diameter, length), and descriptors of axis geometry (inclination, curvature). In conclusion, despite some limitations, MAppleT constitutes a useful tool for simulating development of apple trees in interaction with gravity.

[1]  Christophe Godin,et al.  Similarities and gradients in growth unit branching patterns during ontogeny in "Fuji" apple trees: a stochastic approach. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[2]  Christophe Godin,et al.  Functional-structural plant modelling. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[3]  Jim Hanan,et al.  Using Computational Plant Science Tools to Investigate Morphological Aspects of Compensatory Growth , 2003, International Conference on Computational Science.

[4]  A. Lindenmayer Mathematical models for cellular interactions in development. II. Simple and branching filaments with two-sided inputs. , 1968, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  C. Shoemaker,et al.  Management of alfalfa and the alfalfa Weevil (Hypera postica): An example of systems analysis in forage production , 1984 .

[6]  T. Chow,et al.  Classical Mechanics, Second Edition , 1995 .

[7]  Meriem Fournier,et al.  Mécanique de l'arbre sur pied : modélisation d'une structure en croissance soumise à des chargements permanents et évolutifs. 1. Analyse des contraintes de support , 1991 .

[8]  Christophe Godin,et al.  PlantGL: A Python-based geometric library for 3D plant modelling at different scales , 2009, Graph. Model..

[9]  P. Prusinkiewicz,et al.  3D Architectural Modelling of Aerial Photomorphogenesis in White Clover (Trifolium repens L.) using L-systems , 2000 .

[10]  Pierre-Eric Lauri,et al.  Relationship between the early development of apple fruiting branches and the regularity of bearing—An approach to the strategies of various cultivars , 1997 .

[11]  T. Kira,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PLANT FORM-THE PIPE MODEL THEORY : I.BASIC ANALYSES , 1964 .

[12]  J. S. Hanana,et al.  Linking physiological and architectural models of cotton , 2002 .

[13]  E Costes,et al.  Wide range QTL analysis for complex architectural traits in a 1-year-old apple progeny. , 2007, Genome.

[14]  L. C. Grappadelli,et al.  An expolinear model of the growth pattern of the apple fruit , 1995 .

[15]  Allometric differences between current-year shoots and large branches of deciduous broad-leaved tree species. , 2000, Tree physiology.

[16]  Christophe Godin,et al.  Representing and encoding plant architecture: A review , 2000 .

[17]  A. Lindenmayer Mathematical models for cellular interactions in development. I. Filaments with one-sided inputs. , 1968, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  Tancrède Almeras,et al.  Acquisition de la forme des axes ligneux d'un an chez trois variétés d'abricotier : confrontation de données expérimentales à un modèle biomécanique , 2001 .

[19]  Catherine Massonnet,et al.  Variabilité architecturale et fonctionnelle du système aérien chez le pommier (Malus domestica Borkh.): comparaison de quatre cultivars par une approche de modélisation structure-fonction , 2004 .

[20]  Radomír Mech,et al.  Visual models of plants interacting with their environment , 1996, SIGGRAPH.

[21]  Y. Guédon Estimating Hidden Semi-Markov Chains From Discrete Sequences , 2003 .

[22]  Pierre-Éric Lauri From Tree Architecture to Tree Training – An Overview of Recent Concepts Developed in Apple in France , 2002 .

[23]  G. Deckmyn,et al.  Refined pipe theory for mechanistic modeling of wood development. , 2006, Tree physiology.

[24]  N. MacDonald,et al.  Trees and networks in biological models , 1983 .

[25]  James White,et al.  THE PLANT AS A METAPOPULATION , 1979 .

[26]  Y Guédon,et al.  Modelling branching patterns on 1-year-old trunks of six apple cultivars. , 2002, Annals of botany.

[27]  Christophe Godin,et al.  A Method for Describing Plant Architecture which Integrates Topology and Geometry , 1999 .

[28]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  Plant Biomechanics: An Engineering Approach to Plant Form and Function , 1993 .

[29]  Evelyne Costes,et al.  Bending of apricot tree branches under the weight of axillary growth: test of a mechanical model with experimental data , 2001, Trees.

[30]  T. Tange,et al.  Phototropic bending of non-elongating and radially growing woody stems results from asymmetrical xylem formation. , 2007, Plant, cell & environment.

[31]  Przemyslaw Prusinkiewicz,et al.  Integrating biomechanics into developmental plant models expressed using L-systems 1 , 2000 .

[32]  Jim Hanan,et al.  Functional–structural plant modelling using a combination of architectural analysis, L-systems and a canonical model of function , 2005 .

[33]  Jim Hanan,et al.  Using the canonical modelling approach to simplify the simulation of function in functional-structural plant models. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[34]  J-B Durand,et al.  F F S S P P M M 0 0 4 4 Oral Presentations -session 2 Analysis of the Plant Architecture via Tree-structured Statistical Models: the Hidden Markov Trees , 2022 .

[35]  Godin,et al.  A multiscale model of plant topological structures , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[36]  Hujun Bao,et al.  Synthesizing trees by plantons , 2006, The Visual Computer.

[37]  Przemyslaw Prusinkiewicz,et al.  Design and Implementation of the L+C Modeling Language , 2003, RULE@RDP.

[38]  Evelyne Costes,et al.  Changes in primary and secondary growth as influenced by crop load in ‘Fantasmet’® apricot trees , 2000 .

[39]  Przemyslaw Prusinkiewicz,et al.  Modeling of spatial structure and development of plants: a review , 1998 .

[40]  H. Sinoquet,et al.  Assessment of the three-dimensional architecture of walnut trees using digitising , 1997 .

[41]  P. Prusinkiewicz,et al.  Using L-systems for modeling source-sink interactions, architecture and physiology of growing trees: the L-PEACH model. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[42]  R. Hangarter,et al.  Gravity, light and plant form. , 1997, Plant, cell & environment.

[43]  Przemyslaw Prusinkiewicz,et al.  The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants , 1990, The Virtual Laboratory.

[44]  Meriem Fournier Mécanique de l'arbre sur pied : maturation, poids propre, contraintes climatiques dans la tige standard , 1989 .

[45]  C. D. Murray A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CIRCUMFERENCE AND WEIGHT IN TREES AND ITS BEARING ON BRANCHING ANGLES , 1927, The Journal of general physiology.

[46]  R. Archer,et al.  REACTION WOOD: INDUCTION AND MECHANICAL ACTION! , 1977 .

[47]  Evelyne Costes,et al.  Identification of biomechanical factors involved in stem shape variability between apricot tree varieties. , 2004, Annals of botany.

[48]  Brendan Lane,et al.  The L+C Plant-Modelling Language , 2007 .

[49]  Y. Guédon,et al.  Pattern analysis in branching and axillary flowering sequences. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[50]  Meriem Fournier,et al.  Mécanique de l'arbre sur pied : modélisation d'une structure en croissance soumise à des chargements permanents et évolutifs. 2. Analyse tridimensionnelle des contraintes de maturation, cas du feuillu standard , 1991 .

[51]  Thierry Fourcaud,et al.  Modelling the biomechanical behaviour of growing trees at the forest stand scale. Part I: Development of an Incremental Transfer Matrix Method and application to simplified tree structures , 2004 .

[52]  Bernard Thibaut,et al.  Mechanics of standing trees: modelling a growing structure submitted to continuous and fluctuating loads. 2. Tridimensional analysis of maturation stresses. Case of standard hardwood [cambial growth] , 1991 .

[53]  J. W. Humberston Classical mechanics , 1980, Nature.

[54]  Brendan Lane,et al.  The use of positional information in the modeling of plants , 2001, SIGGRAPH.

[55]  Przemyslaw Prusinkiewicz,et al.  Integrating simulation of architectural development and source-sink behaviour of peach trees by incorporating Markov chains and physiological organ function submodels into L-PEACH. , 2008, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[56]  Pierre-Eric Lauri,et al.  Processus de croissance en relation avec la ramification sylleptique et la floraison chez le pommier , 1995 .

[57]  H Sinoquet,et al.  Exploring within-tree architectural development of two apple tree cultivars over 6 years. , 2003, Annals of botany.

[58]  Yoram Singer,et al.  The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications , 1998, Machine Learning.