Evidence-based intervention against bullying and cyberbullying: Evaluation of the NoTrap! program in two independent trials.

The NoTrap! (Noncadiamointrappola!) program is a school-based intervention, which utilizes a peer-led approach to prevent and combat both traditional bullying and cyberbullying. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of the third Edition of the program in accordance with the recent criteria for evidence-based interventions. Towards this aim, two quasi-experimental trials involving adolescents (age M = 14.91, SD = .98) attending their first year at different high schools were conducted. In Trial 1 (control group, n = 171; experimental group, n = 451), latent growth curve models for data from pre-, middle- and post-tests showed that intervention significantly predicted change over time in all the target variables (victimization, bullying, cybervictimization, and cyberbullying). Specifically, target variables were stable for the control group but decreased significantly over time for the experimental group. Long-term effects at the follow up 6 months later were also found. In Trial 2 (control group, n = 227; experimental group, n = 234), the moderating effect of gender was examined and there was a reported decrease in bullying and cyberbullying over time (pre- and post-test) in the experimental group but not the control group, and this decrease was similar for boys and girls.

[1]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  General Longitudinal Modeling of Individual Differences in Experimental Designs: A Latent Variable Framework for Analysis and Power Estimation , 1997 .

[2]  T. Little,et al.  Effects of the KiVa Antibullying Program on Cyberbullying and Cybervictimization Frequency Among Finnish Youth , 2013, Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53.

[3]  Rosanna E. Guadagno,et al.  Sticks and stones may break your bones, but words will always hurt you: A review of cyberbullying , 2013 .

[4]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  Reducing Bullying and Victimization: Student- and Classroom-Level Mechanisms of Change , 2015, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[5]  L. Bergman,et al.  Personality and Social Psychology Cross-contextual stability of bullying victimization: A person-oriented analysis of cyber and traditional bullying experiences among adolescents , 2012 .

[6]  Ersilia Menesini,et al.  Psychometric Properties of the Florence CyberBullying-CyberVictimization Scales , 2015, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[7]  M. Eisner,et al.  The Future of Research on Evidence-based Developmental Violence Prevention in Europe – Introduction to the Focus Section , 2012 .

[8]  D. Nagin,et al.  Trajectories of Prosocial Behavior and Physical Aggression in Middle Childhood: Links to Adolescent School Dropout and Physical Violence , 2006 .

[9]  Gianluca Gini,et al.  Active Defending and Passive Bystanding Behavior in Bullying: The Role of Personal Characteristics and Perceived Peer Pressure , 2010, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[10]  Rosario Del Rey,et al.  Knowing, Building and Living Together on Internet and Social Networks: The ConRed Cyberbullying Prevention Program , 2012 .

[11]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Perspectives on Evidence-Based Research in Education—What Works? Issues in Synthesizing Educational Program Evaluations , 2008 .

[12]  Giuseppe De Arcangelis,et al.  Structural equations with latent variables, kenneth a. bollen. john wiley & sons, inc., new york, chichester, brisbane, toronto, singapore, 1989, isbn 0-471-01171-1, £39.90 hardbound, pp. xiv + 514 , 1993 .

[13]  Ersilia Menesini,et al.  Empowering Students Against Bullying and Cyberbullying: Evaluation of an Italian Peer-led Model , 2012 .

[14]  C. Salmivalli Bullying and the peer group: A review , 2010 .

[15]  Androniki Kavoura,et al.  Cyberbullying: A Review of the Literature on Harassment Through the Internet and Other Electronic Means , 2010, Family & community health.

[16]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a commentary , 2012 .

[17]  C. Spiel,et al.  Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying Identification of Risk Groups for Adjustment Problems , 2009 .

[18]  D. Farrington,et al.  School bullying: risk factors, theories and interventions , 2010 .

[19]  M. Shiner,et al.  Defining peer education. , 1999, Journal of adolescence.

[20]  D. Farrington,et al.  Bullying as a predictor of offending, violence and later life outcomes. , 2011, Criminal behaviour and mental health : CBMH.

[21]  Gianluca Gini,et al.  Why Do Bystanders of Bullying Help or Not? A Multidimensional Model , 2013 .

[22]  David Weisburd,et al.  Does Research Design Affect Study Outcomes in Criminal Justice? , 2001 .

[23]  Christiane Spiel,et al.  Prevention of Cyberbullying and Cyber Victimization: Evaluation of the ViSC Social Competence Program , 2015 .

[24]  D. Pepler,et al.  Individual Motivations and Characteristics Associated With Bystander Intervention During Bullying Episodes Among Children and Youth , 2012 .

[25]  David P. Farrington,et al.  Effectiveness of Programs to Prevent School Bullying , 2007 .

[26]  Alex R. Piquero,et al.  Self-Control Interventions for Children Under Age 10 for Improving Self-Control and Delinquency and Problem Behaviors: A Systematic Review , 2010 .

[27]  Christina Salmivalli,et al.  Standing Up for the Victim, Siding with the Bully or Standing by? Bystander Responses in Bullying Situations , 2012 .

[28]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[29]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  The Effectiveness of Whole-School Antibullying Programs: A Synthesis of Evaluation Research , 2004 .

[30]  E. Menesini,et al.  Peer education intervention: face-to-face versus online. , 2012 .

[31]  E. Menesini,et al.  Cyberbullying and traditional bullying: Unique, additive, and synergistic effects on psychological health symptoms. , 2012 .

[32]  A. Bandura Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[33]  A. G. Harbaugh,et al.  Bullying prevalence across contexts: a meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. , 2014, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[34]  Melanie Eisner,et al.  No effects in independent prevention trials: can we reject the cynical view? , 2009 .

[35]  T. Little,et al.  Effects of the KiVa Anti-bullying Program on Adolescents’ Depression, Anxiety, and Perception of Peers , 2011, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology.

[36]  B. Muthén,et al.  The Application of Latent Curve Analysis to Testing Developmental Theories in Intervention Research , 1999, American journal of community psychology.

[37]  Ersilia Menesini,et al.  Online and offline peer led models against bullying and cyberbullying. , 2012, Psicothema.

[38]  T. Vaillancourt,et al.  Bullying Is Power , 2003 .

[39]  H. Cowie,et al.  The effectiveness of peer support systems in challenging school bullying: the perspectives and experiences of teachers and pupils. , 1999, Journal of adolescence.

[40]  D. Farrington,et al.  Bullying prevention programs: the importance of peer intervention, disciplinary methods and age variations , 2012 .

[41]  Frank A. Sortino,et al.  From alpha to omega , 2001 .

[42]  D. Mackinnon Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis , 2008 .

[43]  K. Merrell,et al.  How effective are school bullying intervention programs? A meta-analysis of intervention research. , 2008 .

[44]  J. Shepherd,et al.  A method in search of a theory: peer education and health promotion. , 1999, Health education research.

[45]  David P. Farrington,et al.  School-Based Programs to Reduce Bullying and Victimization , 2012 .

[46]  D. Farrington,et al.  Successful Bullying Prevention Programs: Influence of Research Design, Implementation Features, and Program Components , 2012 .

[47]  M. Eisner,et al.  Effectiveness of a Universal School-Based Social Competence Program: The Role of Child Characteristics and Economic Factors , 2012 .

[48]  Robert S. Tokunaga,et al.  Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[49]  E. Menesini,et al.  Cyberbullying: Labels, Behaviours and Definition in Three European Countries , 2010, Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling.

[50]  E. Maticka-Tyndale,et al.  Peer-led interventions to reduce HIV risk of youth: a review. , 2010, Evaluation and program planning.

[51]  Thomas J. Dunn,et al.  From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. , 2014, British journal of psychology.

[52]  Herbert Scheithauer,et al.  Prevention 2.0: Targeting Cyberbullying @ School , 2014, Prevention Science.

[53]  P. Bentler,et al.  Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification , 1998 .

[54]  R. Slavin Evidence-Based Education Policies: Transforming Educational Practice and Research , 2002 .

[55]  E. Menesini,et al.  Level and change of bullying behavior during high school: a multilevel growth curve analysis. , 2013, Journal of adolescence.

[56]  Robert F. Boruch,et al.  Standards of Evidence: Criteria for Efficacy, Effectiveness and Dissemination , 2005, Prevention Science.

[57]  A. Carroll,et al.  A systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent bullying. , 2007, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[58]  Robert Slonje,et al.  The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[59]  C. Currie,et al.  Social determinants of health and well-being among young people: Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: international report from the 2009/2010 survey. , 2012 .

[60]  A. Satorra,et al.  Complex Sample Data in Structural Equation Modeling , 1995 .

[61]  D. Espelage,et al.  Differentiating cyber bullying perpetration from non-physical bullying: commonalities across race, individual, and family predictors. , 2013 .

[62]  David P. Farrington,et al.  Randomized experiments in criminology: What have we learned in the last two decades? , 2005 .

[63]  William Meredith,et al.  Latent curve analysis , 1990 .

[64]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Cyberbullying Definition Among Adolescents: A Comparison Across Six European Countries , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[65]  B. Palladino Evidence-based intervention against bullying and cyberbullying: measurement of the constructs, evaluation of efficacy and mediation processes , 2014 .

[66]  C. Ferguson,et al.  The Effectiveness of School-Based Anti-Bullying Programs , 2007 .

[67]  G. Gini,et al.  The role of bystanders in students' perception of bullying and sense of safety. , 2008, Journal of school psychology.

[68]  C. Spiel,et al.  Evidence-based practice and policy: When researchers, policy makers, and practitioners learn how to work together , 2012 .

[69]  D. French,et al.  School Dropout as Predicted by Peer Rejection and Antisocial Behavior , 2001 .

[70]  C. Cunningham,et al.  The effects of primary division, student-mediated conflict resolution programs on playground aggression. , 1998, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[71]  D. Farrington,et al.  Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a systematic and meta-analytic review , 2011 .

[72]  E. Menesini,et al.  Emotions of Moral Disengagement, Class Norms, and Bullying in Adolescence: A Multilevel Approach , 2015 .

[73]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group , 1998 .

[74]  David P. Farrington,et al.  School-Based Programs to Reduce Bullying and Victimization: A Systematic Review , 2009 .