Beyond odds ratios — communicating disease risk based on genetic profiles

The brisk discovery of novel inherited disease markers by genome-wide association (GWA) studies has raised expectations for predicting disease risk by analysing multiple common alleles. However, the statistics used during the discovery phase of research (such as odds ratios or p values for association) are not the most appropriate measures for evaluating the predictive value of genetic profiles. We argue that other measures — such as sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values — are more useful when proposing a genetic profile for risk prediction.

[1]  M. McCarthy,et al.  Replication of Genome-Wide Association Signals in UK Samples Reveals Risk Loci for Type 2 Diabetes , 2007, Science.

[2]  J. Gibbs,et al.  JBS 2: Joint British Societies' guidelines on prevention of cardiovascular disease in clinical practice , 2005, Heart.

[3]  Qing Lu,et al.  Using the optimal receiver operating characteristic curve to design a predictive genetic test, exemplified with type 2 diabetes. , 2008, American journal of human genetics.

[4]  S. Willey,et al.  Screening and Follow-up of the Patient at High Risk for Breast Cancer , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  Diabetes Uk,et al.  JBS 2: Joint British Societies9 guidelines on prevention of cardiovascular disease in clinical practice , 2005 .

[6]  C. Weinberg,et al.  Use and misuse of population attributable fractions. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[7]  Fengzhu Sun,et al.  On the use of population-based registries in the clinical validation of genetic tests for disease susceptibility , 1999, Genetics in Medicine.

[8]  Muin J. Khoury,et al.  Letting the genome out of the bottle--will we get our wish? , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  R. Wilkins Polygenes, risk prediction, and targeted prevention of breast cancer. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Cornelia M van Duijn,et al.  Genome-based prediction of common diseases: advances and prospects. , 2008, Human molecular genetics.

[11]  P. Fearnhead,et al.  Genome-wide association study of prostate cancer identifies a second risk locus at 8q24 , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[12]  J. Manson,et al.  Adiponectin Genetic Variability, Plasma Adiponectin, and Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes , 2006, Diabetes.

[13]  M. Khoury,et al.  The continuum of translation research in genomic medicine: how can we accelerate the appropriate integration of human genome discoveries into health care and disease prevention? , 2007, Genetics in Medicine.

[14]  T. Wilt,et al.  Five-alpha-reductase Inhibitors for prostate cancer prevention. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[15]  Peter Kraft,et al.  Curses--winner's and otherwise--in genetic epidemiology. , 2008, Epidemiology.

[16]  A. Hofman,et al.  Association of three genetic loci with uric acid concentration and risk of gout: a genome-wide association study , 2008, The Lancet.

[17]  S. Kathiresan,et al.  Polymorphisms Associated With Cholesterol and Risk of Cardiovascular Events , 2008 .

[18]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  Human Genome Epidemiology , 2009 .

[19]  T. Frayling Genome–wide association studies provide new insights into type 2 diabetes aetiology , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[20]  M. Kattan,et al.  Finasteride and high-grade prostate cancer in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  M. Pepe,et al.  Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker. , 2004, American journal of epidemiology.

[22]  Muin J Khoury,et al.  What is the clinical utility of genetic testing? , 2006, Genetics in Medicine.

[23]  A. Maradiegue,et al.  Prostate-specific antigen screening: friend or foe? , 2007, Urologic nursing.

[24]  A. Kibel Multiple newly identified loci associated with prostate cancer susceptibility , 2009 .

[25]  J. Ware The limitations of risk factors as prognostic tools. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  T. Wilt,et al.  Screening for prostate cancer. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[27]  W. Willett,et al.  Multiple loci identified in a genome-wide association study of prostate cancer , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[28]  Francis S Collins,et al.  A HapMap harvest of insights into the genetics of common disease. , 2008, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[29]  M. Pencina,et al.  Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[30]  A. Coates,et al.  Guiding aerosol deposition in the lung. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  Michael M Lieber,et al.  The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  G. Severi,et al.  Five genetic variants associated with prostate cancer. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  M H Gail,et al.  Weighing the risks and benefits of tamoxifen treatment for preventing breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[34]  Leroy Hood,et al.  The Code of Codes Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project , 1992 .

[35]  C K Redmond,et al.  Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[36]  J. Ioannidis Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated , 2008, Epidemiology.

[37]  D P Byar,et al.  Estimating the population attributable risk for multiple risk factors using case-control data. , 1985, American journal of epidemiology.

[38]  Lester L. Peters,et al.  Genome-wide association study identifies novel breast cancer susceptibility loci , 2007, Nature.

[39]  Eric J Topol,et al.  The genomics gold rush. , 2007, JAMA.

[40]  A. Hansell,et al.  Genetic epidemiology and public health: hope, hype, and future prospects , 2005, The Lancet.

[41]  Pär Stattin,et al.  Cumulative association of five genetic variants with prostate cancer. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[42]  K. Sherin,et al.  Screening for prostate cancer in U.S. men ACPM position statement on preventive practice. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[43]  N. Wald,et al.  When can a risk factor be used as a worthwhile screening test? , 1999, BMJ.

[44]  N. Cook Use and Misuse of the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve in Risk Prediction , 2007, Circulation.

[45]  Mitchell H Gail,et al.  On criteria for evaluating models of absolute risk. , 2005, Biostatistics.

[46]  M. Pepe The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction , 2003 .

[47]  Mark Walker,et al.  Combining Information from Common Type 2 Diabetes Risk Polymorphisms Improves Disease Prediction , 2006, PLoS medicine.

[48]  Jose Jeronimo,et al.  Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer , 2007, The Lancet.

[49]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  Predictive testing for complex diseases using multiple genes: Fact or fiction? , 2006, Genetics in Medicine.

[50]  Johanna M Seddon,et al.  Common variation in three genes, including a noncoding variant in CFH, strongly influences risk of age-related macular degeneration , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[51]  B. Macmahon,et al.  Attributable risk percent in case-control studies. , 1971, British journal of preventive & social medicine.