Analytical field-of-regard representation for rapid and accurate prediction of agile satellite imaging opportunities

Abstract. Agile Earth observation satellites (AEOSs) possess high-attitude maneuverability and achieve better efficiency than traditional platforms in imaging missions. Onboard mission scheduling of agile satellites requires rapid and accurate prediction of imaging opportunities. This problem has not yet been fully investigated in the previous literature. Our study presents a precise analytical model for field-of-regard (FoR) representation of agile satellites and applies a self-adaptive Hermite interpolation technique for rapid determination of imaging opportunities. The FoR of an agile satellite is regarded as a large virtual field-of-view (FoV) synthesized from infinite instantaneous FoVs of onboard camera corresponding to all possible orientations of agile satellite within limits of maximum maneuverability. Analytical equations of the bounding envelope of the FoR are formulated through quadratic curve fitting. Visibility criteria of the analytical FoR model are derived and piecewise cubic polynomials featured with autonomous searching for interpolation points are used to approximate the visibility functions. Numerical simulations show that the analytical FoR model approximates the truth model with an accuracy of better than 99%. In addition, the self-adaptive algorithm significantly reduces the computational cost for imaging opportunity determination compared to traditional trajectory checking method.

[1]  Michael E. Hodgson,et al.  Modeling the Potential Swath Coverage of Nadir and Off-Nadir Pointable Remote Sensing Satellite-Sensor Systems , 2008 .

[2]  Mark Clampin,et al.  Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite , 2014, 1406.0151.

[3]  Xiaomin Zhu,et al.  Dynamic Scheduling for Emergency Tasks on Distributed Imaging Satellites with Task Merging , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[4]  P. R. Escobal RISE AND SET TIME OF A SATELLITE ABOUT AN OBLATE PLANET , 1963 .

[5]  Nicolas Jozefowiez,et al.  A multi-objective local search heuristic for scheduling Earth observations taken by an agile satellite , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Bin Du,et al.  Area targets observation mission planning of agile satellite considering the drift angle constraint , 2018 .

[7]  Yingwu Chen,et al.  An improved adaptive large neighborhood search algorithm for multiple agile satellites scheduling , 2018, Comput. Oper. Res..

[8]  Fred A. Kruse,et al.  Validation of DigitalGlobe WorldView-3 Earth imaging satellite shortwave infrared bands for mineral mapping , 2015 .

[9]  David Hall,et al.  Technology advancement of the CCD201-20 EMCCD for the WFIRST coronagraph instrument: sensor characterization and radiation damage , 2015, 1601.01761.

[10]  Jean-Paul Watson,et al.  Mixed-integer programming models for optimal constellation scheduling given cloud cover uncertainty , 2019, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Naofal Al-Dhahir,et al.  Predicting the visibility of LEO satellites , 1999 .

[12]  Djamal Habet,et al.  Bounding the optimum for the problem of scheduling the photographs of an Agile Earth Observing Satellite , 2010, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[13]  Andreas Spitz,et al.  A Mixed Integer Linear Programming Model for Multi-Satellite Scheduling , 2018, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Phil Palmer,et al.  Fast Prediction Algorithms of Satellite Imaging Opportunities with Attitude Controls , 2002 .

[15]  A. Hooper,et al.  High‐resolution digital elevation model from tri‐stereo Pleiades‐1 satellite imagery for lava flow volume estimates at Fogo Volcano , 2016 .

[16]  Yan Mai,et al.  Fast Algorithm for Prediction of Satellite Imaging and Communication Opportunities , 2001 .

[17]  Xiaojie Gao,et al.  Rapid satellite-to-site visibility determination based on self-adaptive interpolation technique , 2016 .

[18]  Salvatore Alfano,et al.  Rapid determination of satellite visibility periods , 1992 .

[19]  Hongrae Kim,et al.  Mission scheduling optimization of SAR satellite constellation for minimizing system response time , 2015 .

[20]  Gérard Verfaillie,et al.  Selecting and scheduling observations of agile satellites , 2002 .

[21]  Zhen Chen,et al.  Scheduling for single agile satellite, redundant targets problem using complex networks theory , 2016 .

[22]  Christian Circi,et al.  A new algorithm for agile satellite-based acquisition operations , 2016 .

[23]  G. Petit,et al.  IERS Conventions (2010) , 2010 .

[24]  Shuang Li,et al.  Onboard mission planning for agile satellite using modified mixed-integer linear programming , 2018 .