Surface roughness analysis in finishing end-milling of duplex stainless steel UNS S32205

Duplex stainless steel (DSS) UNS S32205 presents high resistance to oxidation, corrosion, and corrosion under stress associated with good mechanical properties, thus being widely used in oil exploration and chemical treatment systems. Due to these characteristics, studies on surface quality are justified in the machining of such materials. In this work, dry machining end-milling tests were performed with positive geometry cutting tools (coated carbide inserts with tip radius of 0.4 mm) with different cutting parameters. Each cutting parameter was evaluated in three levels, combined through Box-Behnken Design of experiments (BBD): cutting speed (30, 45, 60 m/min), feed per tooth (0.05, 0.1, 0.15 mm/tooth), and depth of cut (0.2, 0.4, 0.6 mm). Two surface roughness parameters (Ra and Rz) were measured in the machined surfaces under different cutting combinations. Roughness profiles were analyzed for the highest and lowest measured values of surface roughness, and Abbott-Firestone Curve (AFC) and amplitude-probability distribution (APD) represented its statistical profile. In this way, appropriate combination of cutting parameters for minimum Ra and Rz parameters obtained after finishing end-milling of UNS S32205 were determined, as well as AFC and APD of these values, thus allowing the characterization of the performance of tool-workpiece pair in DSS cutting, resulting in Ra and Rz values of 0.182 and 1.302 μm, respectively. Low surface roughness values were validated using BBD, representation of the statistical profile, and optimization of cutting parameters improved the little bibliographical material in DSS milling.

[1]  Jose María Cabrera,et al.  Hot deformation of duplex stainless steels , 2003 .

[2]  M. Chaouachi,et al.  Role of surface finishing on pitting corrosion of a duplex stainless steel in seawater , 1996 .

[3]  Jomy Joseph,et al.  Application of Box Behnken design to optimize the parameters for turning Inconel 718 using coated carbide tools , 2013 .

[4]  K. Lo,et al.  Duplex Stainless Steels , 2012 .

[5]  George-Christopher Vosniakos,et al.  Predicting surface roughness in machining: a review , 2003 .

[6]  J. Paulo Davim,et al.  Surface Texture Characterization and Evaluation Related to Machining , 2010 .

[7]  F. Klocke Manufacturing Processes 1 , 2011 .

[8]  I. Korkut,et al.  Determination of optimum cutting parameters during machining of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel , 2004 .

[9]  S. Limbo,et al.  Antimicrobial Performance of Two Different Packaging Materials on the Microbiological Quality of Fresh Salmon , 2016 .

[10]  A. Dias,et al.  Residual stress analysis in orthogonal machining of standard and resulfurized AISI 316L steels , 1999 .

[11]  Pawel Pawlus,et al.  The method of truncation parameters measurement from material ratio curve , 2008 .

[12]  Cristina Maria Quintella,et al.  Statistical designs and response surface techniques for the optimization of chromatographic systems. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. A.

[13]  Francisco J. G. Silva,et al.  Machining Duplex Stainless Steel: Comparative Study Regarding End Mill Coated Tools , 2016 .

[14]  C. R. Deepak,et al.  Weldability, machinability and surfacing of commercial duplex stainless steel AISI2205 for marine applications – A recent review , 2017, Journal of advanced research.