Summary Street: Interactive Computer Support for Writing

Summary Street is educational software based on latent semantic analysis (LSA), a computer method for representing the content of texts. The classroom trial described here demonstrates the power of LSA to support an educational goal by providing automatic feedback on the content of students' summaries. Summary Street provides this feedback in an easy-to-grasp, graphic display that helps students to improve their writing across multiple cycles of writing and revision on their own before receiving a teacher's final evaluation. The software thus has the potential to provide students with extensive writing practice without increasing the teacher's workload. In classroom trials 6th-grade students not only wrote better summaries when receiving content-based feedback from Summary Street, but also spent more than twice as long engaged in the writing task. Specifically, their summaries were characterized by a more balanced coverage of the content than summaries composed without this feedback. Greater improvement in content scores was observed with texts that were difficult to summarize. Classroom implementation of Summary Street is discussed, including suggestions for instructional activities beyond summary writing.

[1]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Rating the Importance of Structural Units of Prose Passages: A Problem of Metacognitive Development. , 1977 .

[2]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  Supporting Content-Based Feedback in On-Line Writing Evaluation with LSA , 2000, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[3]  M Gajria,et al.  The Effects of Summarization Instruction on Text Comprehension of Students with Learning Disabilities , 1992, Exceptional children.

[4]  James F. Baumann,et al.  The Effectiveness of a Direct Instruction Paradigm for Teaching Main Idea Comprehension. , 1984 .

[5]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Knowledge Organization and Text Organization , 1987 .

[6]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[7]  Evelyn C. Ferstl.  Learning from Text , 2001 .

[8]  Richard Beach,et al.  The Effects of Text Structure Instruction on Middle-Grade Students' Comprehension and Production of Expository Text. , 1984 .

[9]  L. Resnick,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction , 2018 .

[10]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Guided, Cooperative Learning and Individual Knowledge Acquisition , 2018, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction.

[11]  Michael B. W. Wolfe,et al.  Use of latent semantic analysis for predicting psychological phenomena: Two issues and proposed solutions , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[12]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  The Development of Plans for Summarizing Texts , 1983 .

[13]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Are Good Texts Always Better? Interactions of Text Coherence, Background Knowledge, and Levels of Understanding in Learning From Text , 1996 .

[14]  P. David Pearson.  Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[15]  M. Mastropieri,et al.  Reading Comprehension Instruction: Summarization and Self-Monitoring Training for Students with Learning Disabilities , 1991, Exceptional children.

[16]  Susan Randolph Moore,et al.  Questions for Research into Reading-Writing Relationships and Text Structure Knowledge (Focus on Research). , 1995 .

[17]  Steven D. Rinehart.  Some Effects of Summarization Training on Reading and Studying. , 1986 .

[18]  Steven M. Ross,et al.  Oral Summary as a Review Strategy for Enhancing Recall of Textual Material. , 1976 .

[19]  Debbra A. Uttero.  Activating Comprehension through Cooperative Learning. , 1988 .

[20]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[21]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  Learning from text: Matching readers and texts by latent semantic analysis , 1998 .

[22]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[23]  Thomas W. Bean,et al.  The Effect of Three Forms of Summarization Instruction on Sixth Graders' Summary Writing and Comprehension , 1984 .

[24]  Thomas K. Landauer,et al.  Simulating Text Understanding for Educational Applications with Latent Semantic Analysis: Introduction to LSA , 2000, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[25]  Ron Reis,et al.  Teaching Reading and Study Skills to Mildly Handicapped Learners: Previewing and Text Summarization. , 1987 .

[26]  Barbara M. Taylor,et al.  Text Structure and Children's Comprehension and Memory for Expository Material. , 1982 .

[27]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  EFFECTS OF A DIRECT INSTRUCTION MAIN IDEA SUMMARIZATION PROGRAM AND SELF‐MONITORING ON READING COMPREHENSION OF MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES , 1998 .

[28]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Predication , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Macrorules for summarizing texts: the development of expertise , 1983 .

[30]  E. Balajthy,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF DISABLED READERS’ METACOMPREHENSION ABILITY THROUGH SUMMARIZATION TRAINING USING EXPOSITORY TEXT: RESULTS OF THREE STUDIES , 1990 .

[31]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[32]  Peter N. Winograd.  Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts , 1984 .

[33]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  The intelligent essay assessor: Applications to educational technology , 1999 .

[34]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[35]  Ann L. Brown.  Learning, remembering, and understanding , 1982 .

[36]  T. Landauer.  Learning and Representing Verbal Meaning , 1998 .

[37]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Developing Summarization Skills through the Use of LSA-Based Feedback , 2000, Interact. Learn. Environ..