Linking perceived external prestige and collective identification to collaborative behaviors in R&D teams

Research efforts have long been directed at understanding variations in collaborative behaviors among work teams with burgeoning interest in teams operating in knowledge-intensive settings. One of the largely unexplained issues is how does team image and collective identification facilitate collaborative behaviors. Here, survey data were collected from nineteen highly technical work teams engaging in software development in an R&D division of a multinational NASDAQ firm involved in multimedia communications and information processing technology. The relationships between perceived external prestige, collective team identification and team collaborative behaviors were examined. The results of the team-level analyses suggest that perceived external prestige augments collective team identification (measured at Time 1), which in turn engenders a high degree of collaboration and interaction within the team (measured at Time 2). When past team performance was controlled for, the results consistently supported the hypothesized model.

[1]  R. Eklund,et al.  Reconceptualizing Team Identification: New Dimensions and Their Relationship to Intergroup Bias , 2005 .

[2]  S. Worchel,et al.  Psychology of intergroup relations , 1986 .

[3]  Toni L. Doolen,et al.  The impact of organizational context on work team effectiveness: a study of production team , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[4]  Véronique Ambrosini,et al.  Using Single Respondents in Strategy Research , 1997 .

[5]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Product development performance : strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry / Kim B. Clark, Tahahiro Fujimoto , 1991 .

[6]  S. Sitkin.  Learning Through Failure : The Strategy of Small Losses , 1992 .

[7]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Yu-Liang Chi,et al.  Project teaming: Knowledge-intensive design for composing team members , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[10]  Jon R. Katzenbach,et al.  The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization , 1992 .

[11]  Abraham Carmeli,et al.  Linking Meaningfulness in the Workplace to Employee Creativity: The Intervening Role of Organizational Identification and Positive Psychological Experiences , 2009 .

[12]  Willow A. Sheremata.  Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces in Radical New Product Development Under Time Pressure , 2000 .

[13]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[14]  Joon Koh,et al.  A contingent approach on knowledge portal design for R&D teams: Relative importance of knowledge portal functionalities , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  L. James.  Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement. , 1982 .

[16]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[17]  Connie J. G. Gersick,et al.  Social Psychology in Organizations: Advances in Theory and Research , 1994 .

[18]  P. Goodman.  Groups That Work (and Those That Don't)Groups That Work (and Those That Don't) by Hackman Richard. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991, 512 pp. , 1992 .

[19]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 1989 .

[20]  Dominic Abrams,et al.  Processes of social identification , 1992 .

[21]  Abraham Carmeli,et al.  Perceived External Prestige, Affective Commitment, and Citizenship Behaviors , 2005 .

[22]  Hai Zhuge,et al.  A knowledge flow model for peer-to-peer team knowledge sharing and management , 2002, Expert Syst. Appl..

[23]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[24]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification , 1992 .

[25]  Celia V. Harquail,et al.  Organizational images and member identification. , 1994 .

[26]  Glynis M. Breakwell,et al.  Social psychology of identity and the self concept , 1992 .

[27]  H. Tajfel.  Social identity and intergroup relations , 1985 .

[28]  Zhong-Zhong Jiang,et al.  A method for member selection of R&D teams using the individual and collaborative information , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  M. E. Shaw.  Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior , 1971 .

[30]  Nelson N. Foote.  Identification as the basis for a theory of motivation. , 1951 .

[31]  H. Tajfel.  Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[32]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[33]  Menno D.T. de Jong,et al.  Multiple organizational identification levels and the impact of perceived external prestige and communication climate , 2007 .

[34]  A. Pruyn,et al.  THE IMPACT OF EMPLOYEE COMMUNICATION AND PERCEIVED EXTERNAL PRESTIGE ON ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION , 2000 .

[35]  J. Dutton,et al.  Positive organizational scholarship : foundations of a new discipline , 2003 .

[36]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Software Development: Processes and Performance , 1998, IBM Syst. J..

[37]  Hans-Georg Gemünden,et al.  Interteam Coordination, Project Commitment, and Teamwork in Multiteam R&D Projects: A Longitudinal Study , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[38]  M. Riketta.  Organizational identification: A meta-analysis , 2005 .

[39]  G. V. D. Vegt,et al.  Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification , 2005 .

[40]  Amy Buhl Conn,et al.  Implementing computerized technology: an organizational analysis. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[41]  P. Bliese.  Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[42]  M. Brewer,et al.  Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. , 1996 .

[43]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[44]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  From Micro to Meso: Critical Steps in Conceptualizing and Conducting Multilevel Research , 2000 .

[45]  Yuh-Min Chen,et al.  Advanced multi-phase trust evaluation model for collaboration between coworkers in dynamic virtual project teams , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[46]  Paul C. Godfrey,et al.  Identity in organizations : building theory through conversations , 2000 .

[47]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. , 2000, The British journal of social psychology.

[48]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification , 2004 .

[49]  Stephen M. Shortell,et al.  Beauty is in the Eye of the Beholder: The Impact of Organizational Identification, Identity, and Image on the Cooperative Behaviors of Physicians , 2002 .

[50]  Linda C. Schmidt,et al.  Collective efficacy beliefs in student work teams: Relation to self-efficacy, cohesion, and performance , 2006 .

[51]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  Why workers still identify with organizations , 1998 .

[52]  Abraham Carmeli,et al.  Top management team behavioral integration in small-sized firms: A social identity perspective. , 2010 .

[53]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Basking in Reflected Glory: Three (Football) Field Studies , 1976 .

[54]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[55]  Rolf van Dick,et al.  Foci of attachment in organizations: A meta-analytic comparison of the strength and correlates of workgroup versus organizational identification and commitment , 2005 .

[56]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[57]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances. , 1991 .

[58]  Michael G. Pratt,et al.  To be or not to be: Central questions in organizational identification. , 1998 .

[59]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects , 2001 .

[60]  J. Turner.  Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. , 2010 .

[61]  R. Golembiewski.  Handbook of Organizational Behavior , 2001 .

[62]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[63]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Central problems in the management of innovation , 1986 .

[64]  E. Berscheid,et al.  Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior. 3rd ed. , 1981 .