An Evaluation of Signal Annoyance for a Head-Mounted Tactile Display

Abstract : The purpose of this study was to evaluate perceived annoyance for vibrotactile signals applied to the head. A head-mounted tactile display, integrated with a bone conduction system (dual-use, tactile-bone conduction communication system), is considered for military applications, but previous studies have reported unfavorable user reviews for vibrotactile signals applied to the head. Vibrotactile signals from 32 to 250 Hz were sent to the foreheads of 30 participants who rated the perceived annoyance of each signal. Higher frequency signals were rated more annoying than lower frequency signals. Consequently, higher frequency signals will most likely not be preferred on the head and generally may be associated with annoyance and other feelings of unsettledness. We are not advocating that higher signal frequencies should never be used on the head, because there are times when they may be appropriate, especially for various military applications. However, we must be systematic in how we use them to maintain user acceptance.

[1]  S. Bolanowski,et al.  Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Carryl L. Baldwin,et al.  Perceived Urgency Scaling in Tactile Alerts , 2012 .

[3]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  G. Norman.  Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics , 2010, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[5]  Topi Kaaresoja,et al.  Perception of short tactile pulses generated by a vibration motor in a mobile phone , 2005, First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics Conference.

[6]  T. R. Knapp.  Treating ordinal scales as interval scales: an attempt to resolve the controversy. , 1990, Nursing research.

[7]  J.B.F. van Erp,et al.  Guidelines for the use of vibro-tactile displays in human computer interaction , 2002 .

[8]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[9]  C. J. Keemink,et al.  Evidence for different types of mechanoreceptors from measurements of the psychophysical threshold for vibrations under different stimulation conditions. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Richard D. Gilson,et al.  Tactile Technology for Covert Communications , 2006 .

[11]  G. D. Goff.  Differential discrimination of frequency of cutaneous mechanical vibration. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  S. Jamieson.  Likert scales: how to (ab)use them , 2004, Medical education.

[13]  J. V. Erp.  Guidelines for the Use of Vibro-Tactile Displays in Human Computer Interaction , 2002 .

[14]  Lynette A. Jones,et al.  Tactile Displays: Guidance for Their Design and Application , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[15]  Jason K. Kumagai,et al.  EXAMINATION OF HEAD AND CHEST LOCATED TACTILE INFORMATION FOR INFANTRY WAYFINDING , 2005 .