Heterogeneity in the Dorsal Subiculum of the Rat. Distinct Neuronal Zones Project to Different Cortical and Subcortical Targets

The aim of the present study was to relate the distribution of efferents of the dorsal subiculum to their origin along the proximo‐distal axis of the subiculum. The distribution of subicular projections was studied in detail by means of the sensitive anterograde tracer Phaseolus vulgaris‐leucoagglutinin (PHA‐L), and the precise origin of these projections analysed with retrogradely transported fluorescent tracers, using double‐ and triple‐labelling protocols. Injections of PHA‐L in the proximal part of the dorsal subiculum, i.e. that part which borders field CA1, result in labelling of the infralimbic, entorhinal and perirhinal cortices, the nucleus accumbens and the lateral septa) region, the interanteromedial nucleus of the thalamus, the core of the nucleus gelatinosus, and the mammillary nuclei, in particular in the rostral parts of the medial nucleus. In contrast, injections in the distal part of the dorsal subiculum, i.e. that part which borders the presubiculum, give rise to labelling in the retrosplenial and postrhinal cortices, the presubiculum, the anterior thalamic complex, the shell of the nucleus gelatinosus, and the mammillary nuclei, preferentially in the caudal part of the medial nucleus. The results of injections of different retrograde tracers, simultaneously placed in two or three targets of the subicular efferents, confirm the results of the anterograde tracing experiments. Moreover, they clearly demonstrate that the population of subicular neurons which, for example, projects to the nucleus accumbens and the interanteromedial nucleus of the thalamus is almost completely segregated from the population that projects to the retrosplenial cortex and the anterior complex of the thalamus. Thus within the dorsal subiculum, populations of neurons can be differentiated so that each population projects to a unique set of target structures. These cell populations are differentially positioned along the proximo‐distal axis. In view of additional evidence indicating that some of the major afferents to the subiculum are organized along the same axis, we suggest that the heterogeneity of the dorsal subiculum along the proximo‐distal axis reflects a general organizational characteristic of this hippocampal field.

[1]  W. Cowan,et al.  An autoradiographic study of the organization of the efferet connections of the hippocampal formation in the rat , 1977, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[2]  H. Kuypers,et al.  Retrograde anoxal transport of fluorescent substances in the rat's forebrain , 1977, Neuroscience Letters.

[3]  A. Siegel,et al.  Efferent connections of the hippocampal formation in the rat , 1977, Brain Research.

[4]  A. Siegel,et al.  Thalamic projections of the hippocampal formation: Evidence for an alternate pathway involving the internal capsule , 1977, Brain Research.

[5]  W. Cowan,et al.  The connections of the septal region in the rat , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  W. Cowan,et al.  Evidence for collateral projections by neurons in Ammon's horn, the dentate gyrus, and the subiculum: a multiple retrograde labeling study in the rat , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  M. Witter,et al.  Cortical afferents of the nucleus accumbens in the cat, studied with anterograde and retrograde transport techniques , 1982, Neuroscience.

[8]  H Eichenbaum,et al.  Afferent connections of the perirhinal cortex in the rat , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  J. M. Wyss,et al.  Evidence for some collateralization between cortical and diencephalic efferent axons of the rat subicular cortex , 1983, Brain Research.

[10]  L. Swanson The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, George Paxinos, Charles Watson (Eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, CA (1982), vii + 153, $35.00, ISBN: 0 125 47620 5 , 1984 .

[11]  C. Köhler Intrinsic projections of the retrohippocampal region in the rat brain. I. The subicular complex , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[12]  M. Witter A survey of the anatomy of the hippocampal formation, with emphasis on the septotemporal organization of its intrinsic and extrinsic connections. , 1986, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[13]  L. Schmued,et al.  Fluoro-gold: a new fluorescent retrograde axonal tracer with numerous unique properties , 1986, Brain Research.

[14]  M P Witter,et al.  The organization of the reciprocal connections between the subiculum and the entorhinal cortex in the cat: I. A neuroanatomical tracing study , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  M. Witter,et al.  Connections of the parahippocampal cortex in the cat. V. Intrinsic connections; comments on input/output connections with the hippocampus , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  M. Witter,et al.  Organization of the projections from the subiculum to the ventral striatum in the rat. A study using anterograde transport of Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin , 1987, Neuroscience.

[17]  Nobuaki Tamamaki,et al.  Columnar organization in the subiculum formed by axon branches originating from single CA1 pyramidal neurons in the rat hippocampus , 1987, Brain Research.

[18]  M. Witter,et al.  Functional organization of the extrinsic and intrinsic circuitry of the parahippocampal region , 1989, Progress in Neurobiology.

[19]  D. Hopkins,et al.  Mamillary body in the rat: Topography and synaptology of projections from the subicular complex, prefrontal cortex, and midbrain tegmentum , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[20]  H. Shibata Descending projections to the mammillary nuclei in the rat, as studied by retrograde and anterograde transport of wheat germ agglutinin–horseradish peroxidase , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[21]  F. H. Lopes da Silva,et al.  Anatomic organization and physiology of the limbic cortex. , 1990, Physiological reviews.