The Changing University Business Model: A Stakeholder Perspective

Universities are in a current state of transition, whereby they are expected to develop a wide range of relationships with stakeholders in order to enhance regional innovation systems. However, despite external environmental pressures commonly regarded as one of the main drivers of business model evolution, there is a lack of studies that explore business model innovation as a result of multiple stakeholder influences. Accordingly, the aim of this paper is to examine the changing university business model within a region of the United Kingdom, using a stakeholder perspective that will aid theoretical development and refinement in both the business model and stakeholder fields. This examination is aided by consideration of the university business model as an activity system. Repeat interviews, combined with stakeholder theory, have been used to show how the changing university business model–stakeholder relationship has progressed through different stakeholder stages with resultant changes in content, structure and governance. Furthermore, conflicting objectives between each of the stakeholder groups (i.e. academics, industry liaison staff, technology transfer office staff and government support agency representatives) have led to the university business model evolving not as a process of co-creation but rather in a series of transitions whereby multiple stakeholders are continually shaping the university business model through strategies that are dependent upon their salience. Finally, this paper contributes to the development and refinement of business model innovation research, in that the use of stakeholder constructs can illustrate the impact of multiple stakeholders' power and influence on business model innovation.

[1]  Loet Leydesdorff.  The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, …, and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy? , 2010 .

[2]  N. Lockett,et al.  Opportunities and contradictions: the policy paradox of entrepreneurial education and university- business engagement since 1960 , 2010 .

[3]  Xavier Lecocq,et al.  Business Model Evolution: In Search of Dynamic Consistency , 2010 .

[4]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm , 2000 .

[5]  Steven L. Alter.  Architecture of Sysperanto: A Model-Based Ontology of the IS Field , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[6]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[7]  Larry M. Dooley,et al.  The entrepreneurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions , 2011 .

[8]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[9]  J. Jonker,et al.  Stakeholder relationships: the dialogue of engagement , 2005 .

[10]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[11]  W. Powell,et al.  To Patent or Not: Faculty Decisions and Institutional Success at Technology Transfer , 2001 .

[12]  Oswald Jones,et al.  Developing Absorptive Capacity in Mature Organizations , 2006 .

[13]  Mário Raposo,et al.  Stakeholder theory: issues to resolve , 2011 .

[14]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students (5th edn) , 2007 .

[15]  C D Leake,et al.  Future of the University. , 1965, Science.

[16]  H. Etzkowitz.  Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science , 1983, Minerva.

[17]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[18]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Innovating Region: Toward a Theory of Knowledge-Based Regional Development , 2005 .

[19]  David Bennett,et al.  University to business technology transfer—UK and USA comparisons , 2007 .

[20]  K. Storbacka,et al.  Business model design: conceptualizing networked value co-creation , 2010 .

[21]  A. Friedman,et al.  Developing Stakeholder Theory , 2002 .

[22]  Sudhir Gupta,et al.  Case Studies , 2013, Journal of Clinical Immunology.

[23]  Tobias Bachmeier,et al.  Business Model Generation A Handbook For Visionaries Game Changers And Challengers , 2016 .

[24]  Ramon Casadesus-Masanell,et al.  From Strategy to Business Models and onto Tactics , 2010 .

[25]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[26]  D. Dougherty,et al.  Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. , 1996 .

[27]  E. Carayannis,et al.  The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation , 2012 .

[28]  John Child,et al.  The Dynamics of Corporate Co-evolution: A Case Study of Port Development in China , 2013 .

[29]  P. Matthyssens,et al.  Critical Role and Screening Practices of European Business Incubators , 2005 .

[30]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature , 2007 .

[31]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Inter-Organizational Knowledge Transfer: Current Themes and Future Prospects , 2008 .

[32]  Fabrice Pirnay,et al.  A stage model of academic spin-off creation , 2002 .

[33]  Ulla Hytti,et al.  Stakeholder theory approach to technology incubators , 2011 .

[34]  Graham R. Gibbs,et al.  Analyzing Qualitative Data , 2014 .

[35]  Esteve Almirall,et al.  Living Labs: arbiters of mid- and ground-level innovation , 2010, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[36]  Carmelo Cennamo,et al.  Does Stakeholder Management have a Dark Side? , 2009 .

[37]  Thomas Clauss,et al.  Business model innovation in the aviation industry , 2013 .

[38]  Michael Kitson,et al.  Knowledge exchange between academics and the business, public and third sectors , 2009 .

[39]  Stakeholder Relationship Management , 2009 .

[40]  K. Seers.  Qualitative data analysis , 2011, Evidence Based Nursing.

[41]  Kristi Jackson,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo , 2007 .

[42]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation , 2004 .

[43]  Brendan Galbraith,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Principal Investigator Roles in UK University Proof-of-Concept Processes: An Absorptive Capacity Perspective , 2010 .

[44]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  A Triple Helix of University—Industry—Government Relations , 1998, Scientometrics.

[45]  A. Hughes.  University Industry Linkages and UK Science and Innovation Policy , 2006 .

[46]  Yves Pigneur,et al.  Clarifying Business Models: Origins, Present, and Future of the Concept , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge , 2006 .

[48]  H. Etzkowitz.  Research groups as ???quasi-firms???: the invention of the entrepreneurial university , 2003 .

[49]  Equity and the Technology Transfer Strategies of American Research Universities , 2002 .

[50]  K. Eisenhardt.  Better Stories and Better Constructs: The Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic , 1991 .

[51]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[52]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[53]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[54]  H. Chesbrough.  Why Companies Should Have Open Business Models , 2007 .

[55]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Innovating Business Models with Co-Development Partnerships , 2007 .

[56]  B. Edvardsson,et al.  Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: a social construction approach , 2011 .

[57]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Editorial preface to the first volume of Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship , 2012, Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[58]  Krzysztof T. Konecki.  Triangulation and Dealing with The Realness of Qualitative Research , 2008, Qualitative Sociology Review.

[59]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  “Spaces”: A triple helix governance strategy for regional innovation , 2012 .

[60]  Magnus Klofsten,et al.  Growing the Linköping Technopole—A Longitudinal Study of Triple Helix Development in Sweden , 1999 .

[61]  L. Giddings.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2d ed , 2005 .

[62]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Strategic challenges for creating knowledge‐based innovation in China , 2008 .

[63]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[64]  M. Savona,et al.  The changing face of innovation policy: implications for the Northern Ireland economy , 2011 .

[65]  J. Linder,et al.  Changing Business Models: Surveying the Landscape , 2000 .

[66]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research , 2000, QMiP Bulletin.

[67]  B. Clark.  Creating entrepreneurial universities : organizational pathways of transformation , 1998 .

[68]  Tim Rowley.  Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences , 1997 .

[69]  Nicholas Walliman,et al.  Social research methods , 2006 .

[70]  Rodney McAdam,et al.  High tech start-ups in University Science Park incubators: The relationship between the start-up’s lifecycle progression and use of the incubator’s resources , 2008 .

[71]  Maryann Feldman,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Equity and the Technology Transfer Strategies of American Research Universities , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[72]  Hannon Paul,et al.  Towards the entrepreneurial university , 2006 .

[73]  Jeff Frooman.  Stakeholder Influence Strategies , 1999 .

[74]  R. Amit,et al.  The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research , 2011 .

[75]  H. Chesbrough.  Business Model Innovation: Opportunities and Barriers , 2010 .

[76]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[77]  H. Etzkowitz.  The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages , 1998 .

[78]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[79]  Raphael Amit,et al.  Business Model Design: An Activity System Perspective , 2010 .

[80]  David R. Hekman,et al.  Stakeholder Theory and Managerial Decision-Making: Constraints and Implications of Balancing Stakeholder Interests , 2006 .

[81]  A. Tuffley.  Stakeholder Relationship Management , 2010 .

[82]  Jason Seawright,et al.  Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research , 2008 .

[83]  Simon Mosey,et al.  Creating network bridges for university technology transfer: The medici fellowship programme , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[84]  Miguel A. Rodríguez,et al.  Using Stakeholder Dialogue as a Source for New Ideas - a Dynamic Capability Underlying Sustainable Innovation , 2006 .

[85]  J. Morse.  Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed): Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994. Price: $65.00 hardback, $32.00 paperback. 238 pp , 1996 .

[86]  John P. Ulhøi,et al.  Business Model Dynamics and Innovation: (Re)establishing the Missing Linkages , 2011 .

[87]  Fred Pries,et al.  Commercial Exploitation of New Technologies Arising from University Research: Start-Ups and Markets for Technology , 2007 .

[88]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  High-technology spin-offs from government R&D laboratories and research universities , 1998 .

[89]  Special Report: Competing on Knowledge , 2008 .

[90]  David Blumenthal,et al.  Inside the triple helix: technology transfer and commercialization in the life sciences. , 2004, Health affairs.

[91]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[92]  J. Knottnerus,et al.  Real world research. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[93]  M. Feldman,et al.  Entpreprenerial Universities and Technology Transfer: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Knowledge-Based Economic Development , 2006 .

[94]  Charles K. Atkin,et al.  Observation of Parent-Child Interaction in Supermarket Decision-Making , 1978 .

[95]  Rodney McAdam,et al.  The convergence of ICT, policy, intermediaries and society for technology transfer: evidence from European innovation projects , 2013, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[96]  Patrick Spieth,et al.  BUSINESS MODEL INNOVATION: TOWARDS AN INTEGRATED FUTURE RESEARCH AGENDA , 2013 .

[97]  John Ladley,et al.  The Business Model , 2010 .

[98]  A. Bock,et al.  The Business Model in Practice and its Implications for Entrepreneurship Research , 2011 .

[99]  D. Urbano,et al.  Entrepreneurial Universities , 2013 .

[100]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[101]  P. Roupas.  Human and Organisational Factors Affecting Technology Uptake by Industry , 2008 .

[102]  Miguel P Caldas,et al.  Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches , 2003 .

[103]  R. Amit,et al.  Value creation in E‐business , 2001 .

[104]  B. Flyvbjerg.  Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[105]  D. Teece.  Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation , 2010 .

[106]  Kristel Miller,et al.  The development of University Technology Transfer stakeholder relationships at a regional level: Lessons for the future , 2012 .

[107]  Veronika Kisfalvi,et al.  The entrepreneur's character, life issues, and strategy making: A field study , 2002 .

[108]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students , 2006 .