Simulating virtual environments within virtual environments as the basis for a psychophysics of presence

A new definition of immersion with respect to virtual environment (VE) systems has been proposed in earlier work, based on the concept of simulation. One system (A) is said to be more immersive than another (B) if A can be used to simulate an application as if it were running on B. Here we show how this concept can be used as the basis for a psychophysics of presence in VEs, the sensation of being in the place depicted by the virtual environment displays (Place Illusion, PI), and also the illusion that events occurring in the virtual environment are real (Plausibility Illusion, Psi). The new methodology involves matching experiments akin to those in color science. Twenty participants first experienced PI or Psi in the initial highest level immersive system, and then in 5 different trials chose transitions from lower to higher order systems and declared a match whenever they felt the same level of PI or Psi as they had in the initial system. In each transition they could change the type of illumination model used, or the field-of-view, or the display type (powerwall or HMD) or the extent of self-representation by an avatar. The results showed that the 10 participants instructed to choose transitions to attain a level of PI corresponding to that in the initial system tended to first choose a wide field-of-view and head-mounted display, and then ensure that they had a virtual body that moved as they did. The other 10 in the Psi group concentrated far more on achieving a higher level of illumination realism, although having a virtual body representation was important for both groups. This methodology is offered as a way forward in the evaluation of the responses of people to immersive virtual environments, a unified theory and methodology for psychophysical measurement.

[1]  Michael Meehan,et al.  Physiological measures of presence in stressful virtual environments , 2002, SIGGRAPH.

[2]  Mel Slater,et al.  Using Presence Questionnaires in Reality , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[3]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  The Factor Structure of the Presence Questionnaire , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[4]  Paul Zimmons,et al.  The influence of rendering quality on presence and task performance in a virtual environment , 2003, IEEE Virtual Reality, 2003. Proceedings..

[5]  Henry J. Gardner,et al.  Analyzing Ordinal Scales in Studies of Virtual Environments: Likert or Lump It! , 2007, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[6]  Massimo Bergamasco,et al.  Lowering the development time of multimodal interactive application: the real-life experience of the XVR project , 2005, ACE '05.

[7]  Mark J. Kilgard,et al.  Improving Shadows and Reflections via the Stencil Buffer , 1999 .

[8]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Musings on Telepresence and Virtual Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[9]  Mel Slater,et al.  Temporal and Spatial Variations in Presence: Qualitative Analysis of Interviews from an Experiment on Breaks in Presence , 2008, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[10]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  The Experience of Presence: Factor Analytic Insights , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[11]  Mel Slater,et al.  How Colorful Was Your Day? Why Questionnaires Cannot Assess Presence in Virtual Environments , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[12]  Russell M. Taylor,et al.  VRPN: a device-independent, network-transparent VR peripheral system , 2001, VRST '01.

[13]  Mel Slater,et al.  A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculations on the Role of Presence in Virtual Environments , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[14]  Mel Slater,et al.  Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Jonathan Freeman,et al.  A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[16]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Effects of Sensory Information and Prior Experience on Direct Subjective Ratings of Presence , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[17]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  A Virtual Reprise of the Stanley Milgram Obedience Experiments , 2006, PloS one.

[18]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence , 2006 .

[19]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  From presence to consciousness through virtual reality , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  Mel Slater,et al.  Visual Realism Enhances Realistic Response in an Immersive Virtual Environment , 2009, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[21]  Marco Gillies,et al.  Comparing and Evaluating Real Time Character Engines for Virtual Environments , 2010, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[22]  Randima Fernando,et al.  Percentage-closer soft shadows , 2005, SIGGRAPH '05.

[23]  Frederick P. Brooks.  What's Real About Virtual Reality? , 1999, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[24]  M. Whitton,et al.  Effect of latency on presence in stressful virtual environments , 2003, IEEE Virtual Reality, 2003. Proceedings..

[25]  Mel Slater,et al.  The Use of Questionnaire Data in Presence Studies: Do Not Seriously Likert , 2007, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[26]  Mel Slater,et al.  Depth of Presence in Virtual Environments , 1994, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.