Polyethylene glycol solution (PEG) plus contrast medium vs PEG alone preparation for CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy in preoperative colorectal cancer staging

PurposeThis study evaluated the usefulness of combined polyethylene glycol solution plus contrast medium bowel preparation (PEG-C preparation) followed by dual-contrast computed tomography enema (DCCTE) and conventional colonoscopy. The main purpose of these examinations is the preoperative staging of already known tumors.Materials and methodsOne hundred patients with colorectal tumors were alternately allocated to either a polyethylene glycol solution preparation (PEG preparation) group (n=50) or a PEG-C preparation group (n=50) before undergoing conventional colonoscopy and computed tomographic (CT) colonography. After conventional colonoscopy, multidetector row CT scans were performed. Air images were reconstructed for both groups; contrast medium images were additionally reconstructed for the PEG-C preparation group. DCCTE images were a composite of air images and contrast medium images without use of dedicated electronic cleansing software. Quality scores (the presence or absence of blind spots of the colon) were compared between the two groups.ResultsComplete tumor images were obtained by DCCTE for all 50 (100%) lesions in the PEG-C preparation group, as compared with only nine of the 50 lesions (18%) in the PEG preparation group (air-contrast CT enema). The overall quality score in the PEG-C preparation group was significantly better than that in the PEG preparation group (P<0.0001).ConclusionsDCCTE showed the entire colon without blind spots in nearly all patients in the PEG-C preparation group because the areas under residual fluid were reconstructed as contrast medium images. DCCTE and conventional colonoscopy after PEG-C preparation are feasible and safe procedures that can be used for preoperative evaluation in patients with colorectal cancer.

[1]  E. Levy.  Explosions during lower bowel electrosurgery. , 1954, American journal of surgery.

[2]  S. Kudo,et al.  Colorectal tumours and pit pattern. , 1994, Journal of clinical pathology.

[3]  S. Wexner,et al.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery—Are we being honest with our patients? , 1995, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[4]  J R Hecht,et al.  CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  J. Kruskal,et al.  Role of virtual computed tomographic colonography in patients with colorectal cancers and obstructing colorectal lesions , 2000, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[6]  A. Hara,et al.  Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. , 2000, Radiology.

[7]  J G Fletcher,et al.  Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. , 2000, Radiology.

[8]  J. Bruzzi,et al.  Clinical results of CT colonoscopy. , 2001, European radiology.

[9]  R. Mendelson,et al.  Extracolonic findings at virtual colonoscopy: implications for screening programs , 2001, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[10]  J G Fletcher,et al.  CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study. , 2001, Radiology.

[11]  Aytekin Oto,et al.  CT attenuation of colorectal polypoid lesions: evaluation of contrast enhancement in CT colonography , 2003, European Radiology.

[12]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis in virtual colonography via combination of surface normal and sphere fitting methods , 2002, European Radiology.

[13]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Dry preparation for virtual CT colonography with fecal tagging using water-soluble contrast medium: initial results , 2003, European Radiology.

[14]  Jonathan B. Kruskal,et al.  CT colonography: colonic distention improved by dual positioning but not intravenous glucagon , 2002, European Radiology.

[15]  Corinne A Tipker,et al.  CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. , 2002, Radiology.

[16]  T. Vogl,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis in contrast-enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast , 2002, European Radiology.

[17]  Marc Baekelandt,et al.  Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance. , 2002, Radiology.

[18]  M. Macari,et al.  Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. , 2002, Radiology.

[19]  T. Vogl,et al.  Colonography: current status, research directions and challenges. Update 2002 , 2002, European Radiology.

[20]  C. Johnson,et al.  Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. , 2003, Radiology.

[21]  W. Lees,et al.  Prospective Study Comparing Multislice CT Colonography With Colonoscopy in the Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Polyps , 2003, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[22]  Judy Yee,et al.  Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography. , 2003, Radiology.

[23]  S. Halligan,et al.  Use of multidetector-row CT colonography for detection of colorectal neoplasia in patients referred via the Department of Health "2-Week-wait" initiative. , 2003, Clinical radiology.

[24]  S. Kudo,et al.  Triple Colon Cancer Successfully Demonstrated by CT Air-Contrast Enema , 2004, Digestive Surgery.

[25]  Amy Berrington de González,et al.  Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries , 2004, The Lancet.

[26]  M. Macari,et al.  Prevalence and Impact of Extracolonic Findings in Patients Undergoing CT Colonography , 2002, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[27]  J. Welch,et al.  Endoscopic localization of colon cancers , 1994, Surgical Endoscopy.

[28]  P. Lefere,et al.  Supine/left decubitus scanning: a valuable alternative to supine/prone scanning in CT colonography , 2004, European Radiology.

[29]  S. Kudo,et al.  CT Air-Contrast Enema as a Preoperative Examination for Colorectal Cancer , 2005, Digestive Surgery.

[30]  Marek Franaszek,et al.  Computer-aided detection of polyps on oral contrast-enhanced CT colonography. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.