Kinematic MR imaging of the ankle — initial results with ultra-fast sequence imaging

Purpose: In order to evaluate the advantages of ultra-fast MR sequences, kinematic MR imaging studies were performed in 4 patients with osteochondritis dissecans of the talus and in 12 healthy volunteers. Material and Methods: The patients and volunteers were placed inside a custom-made positioning device. Sagittal ultra-fast T2-weighted turbo gradient-echo sequences and HASTE sequences were obtained during active joint motion from dorsiflexion to plantar flexion. Eight sagittal slices were scanned separately to cover this ankle motion. In each slice, 8 to 10 images were obtained in 12-s or 18-s periods. Results: Adequate image quality for analyzing the normal kinematics of the ankle was obtained in all subjects. At surgery, the osteochondral fragment was found to be mobile in 3 of the 4 of the patients. In none of these cases was fragment mobility observed on kinematic MR imaging. No motion of the fragments was observed in the fourth patient, neither at surgery nor on kinematic MR imaging. Conclusion: Ultra-fast MR imaging sequences made it possible to produce kinematic MR imaging studies of active joint motion. The positioning device was useful for guiding joint motion in patients and for obtaining adequate image quality.

[1]  M. Scharling Osteochondritis dissecans of the talus. , 1978, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[2]  G. Revesz,et al.  Osteochondritis dissecans: analysis of mechanical stability with radiography, scintigraphy, and MR imaging. , 1987, Radiology.

[3]  K R Burnett,et al.  Dynamic display of the temporomandibular joint meniscus by using "fast-scan" MR imaging. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  F. Shellock,et al.  Dual-surface-coil MR imaging of bilateral temporomandibular joints: improvements in the imaging protocol. , 1989, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[5]  M. Burnstein,et al.  Value of MR imaging in staging osteochondral lesions of the talus (osteochondritis dissecans): results in 14 patients. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  F G Shellock,et al.  Patellofemoral joint: evaluation during active flexion with ultrafast spoiled GRASS MR imaging. , 1991, Radiology.

[7]  R. Jacoby MRI of the Musculoskeletal System: A Teaching File , 1991 .

[8]  F G Shellock,et al.  Kinematic magnetic resonance imaging of the joints: techniques and clinical applications. , 1991, Magnetic resonance quarterly.

[9]  H. Imhof,et al.  MR contrast arthrography (MRA) in osteochondrosis dissecans. , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  M Heller,et al.  Patellar tracking patterns during active and passive knee extension: evaluation with motion-triggered cine MR imaging. , 1993, Radiology.

[11]  B. Nigg,et al.  In Vitro Kinematics of the Axially Loaded Ankle Complex in Response to Dorsiflexion and Plantarflexion , 1995, Foot & ankle international.

[12]  K. An,et al.  Kinematics of the Normal Arch of the Foot and Ankle Under Physiologic Loading , 1995, Foot & ankle international.

[13]  M Heller,et al.  Kinematic MRI of the knee using a specially designed positioning device. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  A. Allen,et al.  Diagnosis of Bone and Joint Disorders. 3rd ed , 1996 .

[15]  F. Shellock Kinematic MRI of the Joints , 1997 .