Collaboration 3C = C 3 = Communication + Coordination + Coordination The Kiel Approach to Collaborative Systems Collection of Recent Papers

Specification of distribution has neglected over a long period. Instead of explicit specification of distribution, multi-database systems and federated database systems have been extensively discussed in the literature. From the other side, database research has succeeded in developing approaches that incorporate conceptual specification and allow to reason on systems at a far higher abstraction level. With the advent of web information systems systems became naturally distributed. Therefore, we need a techniques for conceptual description of distribution. Distribution does not stand alone but follows computations and business needs. Thus, we need to consider structuring, functionality and distribution at the same time. Since these aspects are intertwined with each other and systems cooperate, communicate and coordinate their action we base our consideration on collaboration. It integrates communication, coordination and cooperation. In this paper we develop a specification framework for collaborating systems.

[1]  Bernhard Thalheim,et al.  Modeling Information Services on the Basis of ASM Semantics , 2003, Abstract State Machines.

[2]  P. Tichý Constructions , 1986, Philosophy of Science.

[3]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations , 2000 .

[4]  Diane C. P. Smith,et al.  Database abstractions: aggregation and generalization , 1977, TODS.

[5]  Hyoil Han,et al.  Survey of semantic annotation platforms , 2005, SAC '05.

[6]  Uwe Hohenstein Formale Semantik eines erweiterten Entity-Relationship-Modells , 1993 .

[7]  Bernhard Thalheim,et al.  Entity-relationship modeling - foundations of database technology , 2010 .

[8]  Egon Börger,et al.  Abstract State Machines. A Method for High-Level System Design and Analysis , 2003 .

[9]  Gerhard Schellhorn,et al.  ASM refinement and generalizations of forward simulation in data refinement: a comparison , 2005, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[10]  Nigel Shadbolt,et al.  Resource Description Framework (RDF) , 2009 .

[11]  Bernhard Thalheim,et al.  Dependencies in relational databases , 1991, Teubner-Texte zur Mathematik.

[12]  Bernhard Thalheim,et al.  Towards a Theory of Genericity Based on Government and Binding , 2006, ER.

[13]  Jennifer Widom,et al.  ULDBs: databases with uncertainty and lineage , 2006, VLDB.

[14]  김현,et al.  XML Topic Maps 가시화를 위한 휴리스틱 접근 방법 , 2005 .

[15]  Peter Wegner,et al.  Interaction as a Framework for Modeling , 1997, Conceptual Modeling.

[16]  Sven Hartmann Reasoning about participation constraints and Chen's constraints , 2003, ADC.

[17]  Bernhard Thalheim,et al.  Component-driven engineering of database applications , 2006, APCCM.

[18]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: the making of a Web Ontology Language , 2003, J. Web Semant..

[19]  Egon Börger,et al.  Discrete Systems Modeling , 2003 .

[20]  Egon Börger,et al.  The ASM Refinement Method , 2003, Formal Aspects of Computing.

[21]  Sanjeev Khanna,et al.  Data Provenance: Some Basic Issues , 2000, FSTTCS.

[22]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Extending and Formalizing the Framework for Information Systems Architecture , 1992, IBM Syst. J..

[23]  Bernhard Thalheim The Conceptual Framework To User-Oriented Content Management , 2006, EJC.

[24]  Bernhard Thalheim,et al.  Conceptual modelling of web information systems , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..

[25]  Gunar Fiedler,et al.  Content Warehouses , 2006 .

[26]  Laurian M. Chirica,et al.  The entity-relationship model: toward a unified view of data , 1975, SIGF.

[27]  Martin Gogolla,et al.  An Extended Entity-Relationship Model: Fundamentals and Pragmatics , 1994 .

[28]  Bernhard Thalheim,et al.  SiteLang: Conceptual Modeling of Internet Sites , 2001, ER.

[29]  Klaus-Dieter Schewe,et al.  Axiomatizing functional dependencies in the Higher-Order Entity-Relationship Model , 2003, Inf. Process. Lett..

[30]  Bernhard Thalheim,et al.  Co-Design of Structuring, Functionality, Distribution, and Interactivity for Information Systems , 2004, APCCM.

[31]  Michael Stonebraker,et al.  Supporting fine-grained data lineage in a database visualization environment , 1997, Proceedings 13th International Conference on Data Engineering.

[32]  Volker Haarslev,et al.  Racer: An OWL Reasoning Agent for the Semantic Web , 2003 .

[33]  Volker Haarslev,et al.  Description Logic Inference Technology: Lessions Learned in the Trenches , 2005, Description Logics.

[34]  Frans Voorbraak,et al.  The logic of actual obligation. An alternative approach to deontic logic , 1989 .

[35]  Fausto Giunchiglia,et al.  Local Models Semantics, or Contextual Reasoning = Locality + Compatibility , 1998, KR.