Leader–Follower Formation and Tracking Control of Mobile Robots Along Straight Paths

We address the problem of tracking control of multiple mobile robots advancing in formation along straight-line paths. We use a leader-follower approach, and hence, we assume that only one swarm leader robot has the information of the reference trajectory. Then, each robot receives information from one intermediary leader only. Therefore, the communications graph forms a simple spanning directed tree. As the existence of a spanning tree is necessary to achieve consensus, it is the minimal configuration possible to achieve the formation-tracking objective. From a technological viewpoint, this has a direct impact on the simplicity of its implementation; e.g., less sensors are needed. Our controllers are partially linear time-varying with a simple added nonlinearity satisfying a property of persistency of excitation, tailored for nonlinear systems. Structurally speaking, the controllers are designed with the aim of separating the tasks of position-tracking and orientation. Our main results ensure the uniform global asymptotic stabilization of the closed-loop system, and hence, they imply robustness with respect to perturbations. All these aspects make our approach highly attractive in diverse application domains of vehicles' formations such as factory settings.

[1]  Adriaan Arie Johannes Lefeber,et al.  Tracking Control of Nonlinear Mechanical Systems , 2000 .

[2]  Elena Panteley,et al.  Exponential tracking control of a mobile car using a cascaded approach , 1998 .

[3]  Fumio Miyazaki,et al.  A stable tracking control method for an autonomous mobile robot , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Wolfgang Hahn,et al.  Stability of Motion , 1967 .

[5]  Elena Panteley,et al.  UGAS of Skew-symmetric Time-varying Systems: Application to Stabilization of Chained Form Systems , 2002, Eur. J. Control.

[6]  Yu-Ping Tian,et al.  A Time-varying Cascaded Design for Trajectory Tracking Control of Nonholonomic Systems , 2006, CCC 2006.

[7]  K. D. Do,et al.  Nonlinear formation control of unicycle-type mobile robots , 2007, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[8]  Ching-Hung Lee,et al.  Tracking control of unicycle-modeled mobile robots using a saturation feedback controller , 2001, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[9]  Randal W. Beard,et al.  A decentralized approach to formation maneuvers , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[10]  Yu-Ping Tian,et al.  A backstepping design for directed formation control of three‐coleader agents in the plane , 2009 .

[11]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  Robust Adaptive Control , 2012 .

[12]  Elena Panteley,et al.  A new notion of persistency-of-excitation for UGAS of NLTV systems: Application to stabilisation of nonholonomic systems , 1999, 1999 European Control Conference (ECC).

[13]  Guangming Xie,et al.  Leader-Following Formation Control of Multiple Mobile Robots , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Symposium on, Mediterrean Conference on Control and Automation Intelligent Control, 2005..

[14]  Antonio Loría,et al.  Relaxed persistency of excitation for uniform asymptotic stability , 2001, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[15]  Ming Cao,et al.  Adaptive leader-follower formation control for autonomous mobile robots , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference.

[16]  Domenico Prattichizzo,et al.  Discussion of paper by , 2003 .

[17]  Michael Defoort,et al.  Sliding-Mode Formation Control for Cooperative Autonomous Mobile Robots , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[18]  Antonio Loría,et al.  Decentralized formation-tracking control of autonomous vehicles on straight paths , 2014, 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[19]  Nathan van de Wouw,et al.  Formation control of unicycle mobile robots: a virtual structure approach , 2009, Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference.