Voices in text, mind, and society

Abstract Voice is often represented either expressively as personal and individualistic or socially as a discourse system. Drawing on sociohistoric theory (particularly Voloshinov and Bakhtin), in this article, I argue for a third view in which voice is simultaneously personal and social because discourse is understood as fundamentally historical, situated, and indexical. Specifically, I explore three key ways that voice may be understood from this perspective: voice as a typification linked to social identities; voice as the reenvoicing of others' words in texts (oral and written) through processes of repetition and presupposition; and finally, voice as it is linked to the situated production of persons and social formations. All three are central to discourse acquisition and use in general and to literate activity in particular. Finally, I conclude by considering the implications of this theoretical perspective for second language writing pedagogies.

[1]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[2]  Carol Berkenkotter,et al.  Genre as Tool in the Transmission of Practice Over Time and Across Professional Boundaries , 1997 .

[3]  Julie A. Hengst,et al.  The Heterogeneity of Discourse Genres: Implications for Development. , 1999 .

[4]  A. Pennycook.  Borrowing Others' Words: Text, Ownership, Memory, and Plagiarism , 1996 .

[5]  Peter Elbow,et al.  Individualism and the teaching of writing: Response to Vai Ramanathan and Dwight Atkinson , 1999 .

[6]  Vivian Zamel,et al.  Response to Ramamathan and Kaplan , 1997 .

[7]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  Individualism, academic writing, and ESL writers , 1999 .

[8]  D. Hymes.  Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach , 1974 .

[9]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[10]  R. Ivanič.  Writing and identity , 1998 .

[11]  Caryl Emerson,et al.  Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics , 1985 .

[12]  Ron Scollon,et al.  Plagiarism and ideology: Identity in intercultural discourse , 1995, Language in Society.

[13]  Vai Ramanathan,et al.  Audience and Voice in Current L1 Composition Texts: Some Implications for ESL Student Writers. , 1996 .

[14]  L. Vygotsky.  Thinking and Speech , 1987 .

[15]  M. Bakhtin,et al.  The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays , 1981 .

[16]  J. Wertsch.  The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology , 1981 .

[17]  George Kamberelis,et al.  Other People's Voices: The Coarticulation of Texts and Subjectivities. , 1992 .

[18]  D. Tannen.  Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse , 1989 .

[19]  J. Wertsch.  Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action , 1992 .

[20]  Karen Ann Watson-Gegeo,et al.  Interactions and authority: The dominant interpretive framework in writing conferences , 1989 .

[21]  Stephen P. Witte.  Context, Text, Intertext , 1992 .

[22]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[23]  James E. Porter,et al.  Intertextuality and the discourse community , 1986 .

[24]  Rodney H. Jones,et al.  Voice, appropriation and discourse representation in a student writing task , 1997 .

[25]  A. N. Leont’ev.  The Problem of Activity in Psychology , 1974 .

[26]  J. Wertsch.  Vygotsky and education: The voice of rationality in a sociocultural approach to mind , 1990 .

[27]  V. Lektorskiĭ,et al.  Subject, object, cognition , 1984 .

[28]  C. Bazerman.  Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science , 1989 .

[29]  Sarah Michaels,et al.  Text and context: A new approach to the study of classroom writing , 1987 .

[30]  M. Inghilleri,et al.  Learning to mean as a symbolic and social process: The story of ESL writers , 1989 .