The Mimo2 Research System

The MiMo2 translation system combines several leading ideas in the areas of linguistics, computation and translation. In the area of translation we follow the basic ideas of Landsbergen 26] by assuming that translation is symmetric; and combine these ideas with the advantages of a transfer approach. Computationally the system focuses on computability and declarativity. The linguistics of the system is based on a lexicalistic and sign-based approach to grammar.

[1]  E. Doerr,et al.  General Semantics. , 1958, Science.

[2]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  Word and Object , 1960 .

[3]  Morris Salkoff,et al.  Machine Translation: The State of the Art, 1964 , 1964 .

[4]  A. Evers.  The transformational cycle in Dutch and German , 1975 .

[5]  Henk C. van Riemsdijk,et al.  A case study in syntactic markedness: The binding nature of prepositional phrases , 1978 .

[6]  David H. D. Warren,et al.  Definite Clause Grammars for Language Analysis - A Survey of the Formalism and a Comparison with Augmented Transition Networks , 1980, Artif. Intell..

[7]  C. Pollard,et al.  Center for the Study of Language and Information , 2022 .

[8]  Fernando Pereira,et al.  The Formalism and Implementation of PATR-II , 1983 .

[9]  David H. D. Warren,et al.  Parsing as Deduction , 1983, ACL.

[10]  Esther Torrego Salcedo.  On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects , 1984 .

[11]  Kimmo Koskenniemi,et al.  A General Computational Model for Word-Form Recognition and Production , 1984 .

[12]  Dan Flickinger,et al.  Structure-Sharing in Lexical Representation , 1985, ACL.

[13]  Stuart M. Shieber,et al.  Using Restriction to Extend Parsing Algorithms for Complex-Feature-Based Formalisms , 1985, ACL.

[14]  M. Baltin,et al.  The Mental representation of grammatical relations , 1985 .

[15]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Dependency and Coordination in the Grammar of Dutch and English , 1985 .

[16]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar , 1985 .

[17]  John Bear.  A Morphological Recognizer with Syntactic and Phonological Rules , 1986, COLING.

[18]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Grammatical hierarchy and linear precedence , 1986 .

[19]  Karen Spärck Jones,et al.  Readings in natural language processing , 1986 .

[20]  Stuart M. Shieber,et al.  Prolog and Natural-Language Analysis , 1987 .

[21]  Douglas E. Appelt,et al.  Bidirectional Grammars and the Design of Natural Language Generation Systems , 1987, TINLAP.

[22]  Susan Hirsh.  P-PATR: A Compiler for Unification-Based Grammars , 1987, Natural Language Understanding and Logic Programming Workshop.

[23]  Stephen G. Pulman,et al.  Formalisms For Morphographemic Description , 1987, EACL.

[24]  Stephen G. Pulman,et al.  A Computational Framework for Lexical Description , 1987, Comput. Linguistics.

[25]  Raymond Turner,et al.  Semantics and property theory , 1988 .

[26]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  Category Structures , 1988, Comput. Linguistics.

[27]  Annelise Bech,et al.  The E-framework: a formalism for natural language processing , 1988, COLING.

[28]  Carl Pollard,et al.  Categorial Grammar and Phrase Structure Grammar: An Excursion on the Syntax-Semantics Frontier , 1988 .

[29]  Jürgen Wedekind.  Generation as structure driven derivation , 1988, COLING.

[30]  Paul S. Jacobs.  Achieving bidirectionality , 1988, COLING.

[31]  Stuart M. Shieber,et al.  A Uniform Architecture for Parsing and Generation , 1988, COLING.

[32]  Towards reversible MT systems , 1989, MTSUMMIT.

[33]  Gertjan van Noord.  BUG: A Directed Bottom Up Generator for Unification Based Formalisms , 1989 .

[34]  Louisa Sadler,et al.  An Approach to Sentence-Level Anaphora in Machine Translation , 1989, EACL.

[35]  Jonathan Calder,et al.  Paradigmatic Morphology , 1989, EACL.

[36]  Gertjan van Noord,et al.  A Semantic-Head-Driven Generation Algorithm for Unification-Based Formalisms , 1989, ACL.

[37]  Gertjan van Noord.  An overview of head-driven bottom-up generation , 1990 .