Dynamic compression of metallic sandwich structures during planar impulsive loading in water

The compressive response of rigidly supported stainless steel sandwich panels subject to a planar impulsive load in water is investigated. Five core topologies that spanned a wide range of crush strengths and strain-dependencies were investigated. They included a (i) square-honeycomb, (ii) triangular honeycomb, (iii) multi-layer pyramidal truss, (iv) triangular corrugation and (v) diamond corrugation, all with a core relative density of approximately 5%. Quasi-statically, the honeycombs had the highest peak strength, but exhibited strong softening beyond the peak strength. The truss and corrugated cores had significantly lower strength, but a post yield plateau that extended to beyond a plastic strain of 60% similar to metal foams. Dynamically, the transmitted pressures scale with the quasi-static strength. The final transmitted momentum increased slowly with core strength (provided the cores were not fully crushed). It is shown that the essential aspects of the dynamic response, such as the transmitted momentum and the degree of core compression, are captured with surprising fidelity by modeling the cores as equivalent metal foams having plateau strengths represented by the quasi-static peak strength. The implication is that, despite considerable differences in core topology and dynamic deformation modes, a simple foam-like model replicates the dynamic response of rigidly supported sandwich panels subject to planar impulsive loads. It remains to ascertain whether such foam-like models capture more nuanced aspects of sandwich panel behavior when locally loaded in edge clamped configurations.

[1]  Howard P. Hodson,et al.  Cross flow heat exchange of textile cellular metal core sandwich panels , 2007 .

[2]  Haydn N. G. Wadley,et al.  Analysis and interpretation of a test for characterizing the response of sandwich panels to water blast , 2007 .

[3]  Vikram Deshpande,et al.  The use of metal foam projectiles to simulate shock loading on a structure , 2005 .

[4]  Douglas T. Queheillalt,et al.  DEFORMATION AND FRACTURE MODES OF SANDWICH STRUCTURES SUBJECTED TO UNDERWATER IMPULSIVE LOADS , 2007 .

[5]  Haydn N. G. Wadley,et al.  Compressive response of multilayered pyramidal lattices during underwater shock loading , 2008 .

[6]  Vikram Deshpande,et al.  One-dimensional response of sandwich plates to underwater shock loading , 2005 .

[7]  Vikram Deshpande,et al.  The Underwater Blast Resistance of Metallic Sandwich Beams With Prismatic Lattice Cores , 2007 .

[8]  Haydn N. G. Wadley,et al.  Dynamic compression of square honeycomb structures during underwater impulsive loading , 2007 .

[9]  Haydn N. G. Wadley,et al.  Dynamic response of a multilayer prismatic structure to impulsive loads incident from water , 2009 .

[10]  Vikram Deshpande,et al.  The compressive and shear responses of corrugated and diamond lattice materials , 2006 .

[11]  Douglas T. Queheillalt,et al.  A multifunctional heat pipe sandwich panel structure , 2008 .

[12]  H. Wadley Multifunctional periodic cellular metals , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[13]  N. Fleck,et al.  The out-of-plane compressive behavior of metallic honeycombs , 2004 .

[14]  Samuel W. Key,et al.  Transient shell response by numerical time integration , 1973 .

[15]  David R Hayhurst,et al.  The response of metallic sandwich panels to water blast , 2007 .

[16]  Hans H. Bleich,et al.  Interaction between structures and bilinear fluids , 1970 .

[17]  N. Fleck,et al.  The Resistance of Clamped Sandwich Beams to Shock Loading , 2004 .

[18]  Vikram Deshpande,et al.  The impulsive response of sandwich beams: analytical and numerical investigation of regimes of behaviour , 2006 .

[19]  Zhenyu Xue,et al.  Metal sandwich plates optimized for pressure impulses , 2005, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences.