Timbre discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners under different noise conditions

In an attempt to quantify differences in object separation and timbre discrimination between normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with a moderate sensorineural hearing loss of two different configurations, psychoacoustic measurements were performed with a total of 50 listeners. The experiments determined just noticeable differences (JND) of timbre in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects along continua of "morphed" musical instruments and investigated the variance of JND in silence and different background noise conditions and on different sound levels. The results show that timbre JNDs of subjects with a steep hearing loss are significantly higher than of normal-hearing subjects, both in silence and noise, whereas timbre JNDs of flat/diagonal hearing-impaired subjects are similar to JNDs of normal-hearing subjects for signal levels above 55 dB (plus appropriate amplification for hearing-impaired). In noise (SNR=+10 dB) timbre JNDs of all subject groups are significantly higher than in silence. In the condition testing, transferability from silence to noise (i.e., the ability to imagine how the stimulus heard in silence would sound in noise), no significant JND differences across listener groups were found. The results can be explained by primary factors involved in sensorineural hearing loss and contradict the hypothesis that hearing-impaired people generally have more problems in object discrimination than normal-hearing people.

[1]  J. Knutson,et al.  Effects of Frequency, Instrumental Family, and Cochlear Implant Type on Timbre Recognition and Appraisal , 2002, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[2]  B. Moore.  Cochlear Hearing Loss , 2019, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Human Communication Sciences and Disorders.

[3]  J. Berger,et al.  The thirteen colors of timbre , 2005, IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, 2005..

[4]  P. Iverson,et al.  Auditory stream segregation by musical timbre: effects of static and dynamic acoustic attributes. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  C Roup,et al.  Normal and hearing-impaired word recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet and noise. , 1997, British journal of audiology.

[6]  T. Griffiths,et al.  What is an auditory object? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  B. Moore,et al.  A Test for the Diagnosis of Dead Regions in the Cochlea , 2000, British journal of audiology.

[8]  David Laurenson,et al.  Estimating clean speech thresholds for perceptual based speech enhancement , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics. WASPAA'99 (Cat. No.99TH8452).

[9]  R. Fay,et al.  Compression: From Cochlea to Cochlear Implants , 2013, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research.

[10]  J M Festen,et al.  Relations between auditory functions in impaired hearing. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  On the Four Factors Involved in Sensorineural Hearing Loss , 1999 .

[12]  Sid P. Bacon,et al.  Cochlear Compression: Perceptual Measures and Implications for Normal and Impaired Hearing , 2003, Ear and hearing.

[13]  G. Soete,et al.  Perceptual scaling of synthesized musical timbres: Common dimensions, specificities, and latent subject classes , 1995, Psychological research.

[14]  Volker Hohmann,et al.  Modeling loudness growth and loudness summation in hearing-impaired listeners , 1995 .

[15]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Psychophysics physiology and models of hearing , 1999 .

[16]  A Salmivalli,et al.  Effect of noise on word discrimination by subjects with impaired hearing, compared with those with normal hearing. , 1990, Scandinavian audiology.

[17]  Walt Jesteadt.  Modeling sensorineural hearing loss , 1997 .

[18]  B. Moore.  An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing , 1977 .

[19]  J. Grey.  Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  S. Emirog̃lu.  Timbre perception and object separation with normal and impaired hearing , 2007 .

[21]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  P. E. Stopp.  Frequency analysis and periodicity detection in hearing 1971, Plomp and Smoorenburg (Editors). Leiden, Netherlands: Sijthoff Leiden. Cloth, Fl. 60 , 1971 .