In this paper, algorithms are presented that model increased collaboration between the air traffic service provider and airspace users on flight route and delay decisions. These decisions are part of the traffic flow management function that constrains demand below capacity. Currently, users cannot make changes to the route or delay of a flight close to or after departure time and instead must send requests to the service provider who attempts to accommodate the users based on congestion and workload limitations. To mitigate this limitation, the algorithms model a new collaboration scheme. First, users directly implement their flight route and delay decisions, when the flight is further from the congested airspace, without sending a request to the service provider. The service provider can override their action when the flight becomes closer to the congested airspace. Second, users send flight ranking, route ranking and location-to-absorb-delay preferences to the service provider. The service provider may reject these preferences if needed. The algorithms are used to study whether increasing users’ responsibility and increasing their preferences would prevent maintaining demand below capacity. To prevent demand from exceeding capacity the algorithms impose limits, such as available routes and imposed flow rates, on user decisions. A simulation case demonstrates the impact of the collaboration schemes on reducing demand below capacity within an en-route center. Preliminary results indicate that aircraft delay and, to a larger extent, passenger delay are reduced. However, congestion is reduced by a smaller amount when user preferences are considered by the service provider. Giving users responsibility according to service provider limits and delay feedback did not increase congestion.
[1]
Mark G. Ballin,et al.
Distributed Air/Ground Traffic Management for En Route Flight Operations
,
2001
.
[2]
Robert A. Vivona,et al.
Field Observations of Interactions Between Traffic Flow Management and Airline Operations
,
2006
.
[3]
Kan Chang,et al.
Enhancements to the FAA Ground-Delay Program Under Collaborative Decision Making
,
2001,
Interfaces.
[4]
Jimmy Krozel,et al.
Benefit Mechanisms of Enhanced Collaboration in Tactical Traffic Flow Management
,
2006
.
[6]
Michael Wambsganss,et al.
Collaborative Decision Making through Dynamic Information Transfer
,
1996
.
[7]
Michael O. Ball,et al.
Collaborative decision making in air traffic management current and future research directions
,
2001
.
[8]
Maarten Sierhuis,et al.
A Multi-Agent Simulation of Collaborative Air Traffic Flow Management
,
2009,
Multi-Agent Systems for Traffic and Transportation Engineering.
[9]
Philip J. Smith,et al.
Congestion Management via Interactive Dynamic Flight Lists and Customer Submitted Multiple Routing Options
,
2005
.
[10]
Robert A. Vivona,et al.
Operational Concept for Collaborative Traffic Flow Management based on Field Observations
,
2005
.
[11]
Banavar Sridhar,et al.
Airspace Complexity and its Application in Air Traffic Management
,
1998
.
[12]
Kapil S. Sheth,et al.
Task Analysis for Feasibility Assessment of a Collaborative Traffic Flow Management Concept
,
2008
.
[13]
Kapil Sheth,et al.
FACET: Future ATM Concepts Evaluation Tool
,
2001
.