In situ fibrillation of polyamide 6 in isotactic polypropylene occurring in the laminating-multiplying die

The polyamide 6 (PA6)/isotactic polypropylene (iPP) in situ fibrillation composites are prepared by a novel extrusion die with an assembly of laminating-multiplying elements (LMEs). The scanning electron micrographs illustrate that the dividing-multiplying processes in LMEs elongate, break, and stabilize the dispersed PA6 phase in the iPP matrix along the flowing direction (FD). The morphology development of PA6 with different LME numbers greatly affects the rheological properties, crystalline behaviors, and mechanical properties. The dynamic rheological test performed at 195°C shows that the increased spatial restriction of the high-aspect-ratio PA6 particles increases the viscoelastic moduli, complex viscosity, and relaxation time. The crystalline analysis reveals that the heterogeneous nucleation becomes predominant and the transcrystalline morphology is observed in those samples produced by more LMEs. The tensile tests indicate that both, breaking strength and elongation, enhanced simultaneously because of the fibrillation of dispersed phase and the improvement in interfacial adhesion between the fibers and the matrix. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Shaoyun Guo,et al.  Structure and properties of electrically conducting composites consisting of alternating layers of pure polypropylene and polypropylene with a carbon black filler , 2008 .

[2]  K. Shen,et al.  Crystallization of oriented isotactic polypropylene (iPP) in the presence of in situ poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) microfibrils , 2008 .

[3]  Hongwu Wu,et al.  Effects of vibration force field on the interfacial interaction and morphology of polystyrene/poly(methyl methacrylate) blends , 2008 .

[4]  D. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Oxygen permeability analysis of microfibril reinforced composites from PE/PET blends , 2008 .

[5]  Sabu Thomas,et al.  Morphology, static and dynamic mechanical properties of in situ microfibrillar composites based on polypropylene/poly (ethylene terephthalate) blends , 2008 .

[6]  D. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Nanofibril reinforced composites from polymer blends , 2008 .

[7]  J. Sheng,et al.  Evolution of phase dimensions and interfacial morphology of polypropylene/polystyrene compatibilized blends during mixing , 2007 .

[8]  P. Supaphol,et al.  In situ microfibrillar-reinforced composites of isotactic polypropylene/recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) system and effect of compatibilizer , 2006 .

[9]  K. Friedrich,et al.  Microfibrillar reinforced composites from PET/PP blends: processing, morphology and mechanical properties , 2005 .

[10]  Sadhan Jana,et al.  Effects of viscosity ratio and composition on development of morphology in chaotic mixing of polymers , 2004 .

[11]  Sie Chin Tjong,et al.  Structure, morphology, mechanical and thermal characteristics of the in situ composites based on liquid crystalline polymers and thermoplastics , 2003 .

[12]  Wenyi Huang,et al.  Factors influencing the fiberization and mechanical properties of polypropylene/polyamide 66 in situ composites , 2003 .

[13]  Rui Huang,et al.  In‐situ microfiber reinforced composite based on PET and PE via slit die extrusion and hot stretching: Influences of hot stretching ratio on morphology and tensile properties at a fixed composition , 2003 .

[14]  F. Greco,et al.  Effects of matrix viscoelasticity on drop deformation in dilute polymer blends under slow shear flow , 2003 .

[15]  A. Marcinčin,et al.  Modification of fiber-forming polymers by additives , 2002 .

[16]  A. Cunha,et al.  Recycling of poly(ethylene terephthalate) as polymer‐polymer composites , 2002 .

[17]  Q. Zheng,et al.  Dynamic rheological behaviors of metallocene-based ethylene–butene copolymers and their blends with low-density polyethylene , 2002 .

[18]  Rui Huang,et al.  Droplet/fiber transitions in polyethylene/polycarbonate blend generated during drawing or impacting and observed through scanning electron microscope , 2000 .

[19]  P. Cassagnau,et al.  Fibrillar morphology development of PE/PBT blends: Rheology and solvent permeability , 1998 .

[20]  S. M. Aharoni,et al.  Increased glass transition temperature in motionally constrained semicrystalline polymers , 1998 .

[21]  S. Lee,et al.  Mechanical properties of polypropylene/polyamide 6 blends: Effect of manufacturing processes and compatibilization , 1997 .

[22]  S. Fakirov,et al.  Morphology of microfibrillar reinforced composites PET/PA 6 blend , 1996 .

[23]  S. Fakirov,et al.  Microfibrillar reinforced composites from binary and ternary blends of polyesters and nylon 6 , 1993 .

[24]  R. Buscall,et al.  The rheology of solutions of associating polymers: Comparison of experimental behavior with transient network theory , 1993 .

[25]  L. Utracki,et al.  Development of polymer blend morphology during compounding in a twin-screw extruder. Part I: Droplet dispersion and coalescence—a review , 1992 .

[26]  L. Utracki,et al.  Development of polymer blend morphology during compounding in a twin-screw extruder , 1992 .

[27]  J. Im,et al.  Thickness effects in microlayer composites of polycarbonate and poly(styrene-acrylonitrile) , 1990 .

[28]  J. L. Way,et al.  The effect of spherulite size on the fracture morphology of polypropylene , 1974 .