Monte Carlo loop refinement and virtual screening of the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor transmembrane domain

Metropolis Monte Carlo (MMC) loop refinement has been performed on the three extracellular loops (ECLs) of rhodopsin and opsin-based homology models of the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor transmembrane domain, a class A type G protein-coupled receptor. The Monte Carlo sampling technique, employing torsion angles of amino acid side chains and local moves for the six consecutive backbone torsion angles, has previously reproduced the conformation of several loops with known crystal structures with accuracy consistently less than 2 Å. A grid-based potential map, which includes van der Waals, electrostatics, hydrophobic as well as hydrogen-bond potentials for bulk protein environment and the solvation effect, has been used to significantly reduce the computational cost of energy evaluation. A modified sigmoidal distance-dependent dielectric function has been implemented in conjunction with the desolvation and hydrogen-bonding terms. A long high-temperature simulation with 2 kcal/mol repulsion potential resulted in extensive sampling of the conformational space. The slow annealing leading to the low-energy structures predicted secondary structure by the MMC technique. Molecular docking with the reported agonist reproduced the binding site within 1.5 Å. Virtual screening performed on the three lowest structures showed that the ligand-binding mode in the inter-helical region is dependent on the ECL conformations.

[1]  R. Paschke,et al.  Evidence for cooperative signal triggering at the extracellular loops of the TSH receptor , 2008, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[2]  Torsten Schwede,et al.  The SWISS-MODEL Repository and associated resources , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[3]  Subramaniam Ananthan,et al.  Recent Advances in Structure-Based Virtual Screening of G-Protein Coupled Receptors , 2009, The AAPS Journal.

[4]  Patrick Scheerer,et al.  Crystal structure of the ligand-free G-protein-coupled receptor opsin , 2008, Nature.

[5]  Maya Topf,et al.  PREDICT modeling and in‐silico screening for G‐protein coupled receptors , 2004, Proteins.

[6]  A. Gilman,et al.  G proteins: transducers of receptor-generated signals. , 1987, Annual review of biochemistry.

[7]  B. Raaka,et al.  Small-molecule agonists for the thyrotropin receptor stimulate thyroid function in human thyrocytes and mice , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Arthur J. Olson,et al.  AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[9]  Jonathan S. Mason,et al.  Progress in Structure Based Drug Design for G Protein-Coupled Receptors , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[10]  Ian T. Crosby,et al.  Homology Modeling and Docking Evaluation of Aminergic G Protein-Coupled Receptors , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[11]  Andrej ⩽ali,et al.  Comparative protein modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints , 1995 .

[12]  T. Blundell,et al.  Crystal structure of the TSH receptor in complex with a thyroid-stimulating autoantibody. , 2007, Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association.

[13]  T. Blundell,et al.  Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  P. Kollman,et al.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations. , 2006, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[15]  E. Mehler,et al.  Electrostatic effects in proteins: comparison of dielectric and charge models. , 1991, Protein engineering.

[16]  K. Palczewski,et al.  Crystal Structure of Rhodopsin: A G‐Protein‐Coupled Receptor , 2002, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[17]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function , 1998, J. Comput. Chem..

[18]  J. Silberg,et al.  A transposase strategy for creating libraries of circularly permuted proteins , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  M. Mezei,et al.  Prediction of protein loop structures using a local move Monte Carlo approach and a grid-based force field. , 2008, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[20]  John P. Overington,et al.  How many drug targets are there? , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[21]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[22]  E. Jaeger,et al.  Comparison of automated docking programs as virtual screening tools. , 2005, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

[23]  Torsten Schwede,et al.  The SWISS-MODEL workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling , 2006, Bioinform..

[24]  Vincent B. Chen,et al.  Correspondence e-mail: , 2000 .

[25]  Gebhard F. X. Schertler,et al.  Structure of a β1-adrenergic G-protein-coupled receptor , 2008, Nature.

[26]  R. Paschke,et al.  Interactions between the extracellular domain and the extracellular loops as well as the 6th transmembrane domain are necessary for TSH receptor activation. , 2005, European journal of endocrinology.

[27]  Yongbo Hu,et al.  Comparison of Several Molecular Docking Programs: Pose Prediction and Virtual Screening Accuracy , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[28]  A. Sali,et al.  Modeling of loops in protein structures , 2000, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[29]  Andrzej Kolinski,et al.  Modeling of loops in proteins: a multi-method approach , 2010, BMC Structural Biology.

[30]  Mihaly Mezei,et al.  Simulaid: A simulation facilitator and analysis program , 2010, J. Comput. Chem..

[31]  M. Wheatley,et al.  The third extracellular loop of G-protein-coupled receptors: more than just a linker between two important transmembrane helices. , 2004, Biochemical Society transactions.

[32]  Marta Filizola,et al.  Modern homology modeling of G-protein coupled receptors: which structural template to use? , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[33]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles , 1992, Nature.

[34]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  GPCR 3D homology models for ligand screening: Lessons learned from blind predictions of adenosine A2a receptor complex , 2010, Proteins.

[35]  Mihaly Mezei,et al.  Efficient Monte Carlo sampling for long molecular chains using local moves, tested on a solvated lipid bilayer , 2003 .

[36]  Mihaly Mezei,et al.  Dockres: a computer program that analyzes the output of virtual screening of small molecules , 2010, Source Code for Biology and Medicine.

[37]  Mihaly Mezei,et al.  Automatic Determination of Stepsize Parameters in Monte Carlo Simulation Tested on a Bromodomain-Binding Octapeptide , 2009, Algorithms.

[38]  The UniProt Consortium,et al.  Reorganizing the protein space at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[39]  Robert P. Sheridan,et al.  Comparison of Topological, Shape, and Docking Methods in Virtual Screening , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[40]  D. Theodorou,et al.  A concerted rotation algorithm for atomistic Monte Carlo simulation of polymer melts and glasses , 1993 .

[41]  M. Zaidi,et al.  The thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor: impact of thyroid-stimulating hormone and thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibodies on multimerization, cleavage, and signaling. , 2009, Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America.

[42]  Orr Ravitz,et al.  Improving molecular docking through eHiTS’ tunable scoring function , 2011, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[43]  Ola Engkvist,et al.  Molecular modeling of the second extracellular loop of G‐protein coupled receptors and its implication on structure‐based virtual screening , 2008, Proteins.

[44]  R. Núñez Miguel,et al.  Crystal structure of the TSH receptor (TSHR) bound to a blocking-type TSHR autoantibody. , 2011, Journal of molecular endocrinology.

[45]  Aniko Simon,et al.  eHiTS: an innovative approach to the docking and scoring function problems. , 2006, Current protein & peptide science.

[46]  D. Baker,et al.  Modeling structurally variable regions in homologous proteins with rosetta , 2004, Proteins.

[47]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Atomic solvation parameters applied to molecular dynamics of proteins in solution , 1992, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[48]  Sergio A Hassan,et al.  Ab initio computational modeling of loops in G‐protein‐coupled receptors: Lessons from the crystal structure of rhodopsin , 2006, Proteins.

[49]  Ernst-Walter Knapp,et al.  Polypeptide folding with off-lattice Monte Carlo dynamics: the method , 1996, European Biophysics Journal.

[50]  S. A. Hassan,et al.  Key issues in the computational simulation of GPCR function: representation of loop domains , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[51]  David E. Kim,et al.  Sampling bottlenecks in de novo protein structure prediction. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[52]  J. A. Hartigan,et al.  A k-means clustering algorithm , 1979 .

[53]  Didier Rognan,et al.  Customizing G Protein-coupled receptor models for structure-based virtual screening. , 2009, Current pharmaceutical design.

[54]  Junmei Wang,et al.  Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[55]  Richard A Friesner,et al.  Successful prediction of the intra- and extracellular loops of four G-protein-coupled receptors , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  A semiempirical free energy force field with charge‐based desolvation , 2007, J. Comput. Chem..

[57]  Stefano Costanzi,et al.  On the applicability of GPCR homology models to computer-aided drug discovery: a comparison between in silico and crystal structures of the beta2-adrenergic receptor. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[58]  K. Palczewski,et al.  Comparative Analysis of GPCR Crystal Structures † , 2009, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[59]  Akbar Nayeem,et al.  Loopholes and missing links in protein modeling , 2007, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[60]  L. Stone,et al.  In search of analgesia: emerging roles of GPCRs in pain. , 2009, Molecular interventions.