Experimental Study on Optimizing Steam Solvent Co-Injection Process in Akan Carbonate Oilfield

Steam solvent co-injection processes are generating considerable interest in terms of improving heavy oil upgrading in unconventional reservoirs. The characteristics of the opted solvents in the field have not been dealt with in depth. This paper presents a study on selecting the most optimal solvent for the Akan oilfield enhanced oil recovery (EOR). The first step in this work consisted of determining the Akan oil field viscosity, through an elemental and SARA analyses. Next, a set of physical and chemical methods was used to understand the mechanism of solvents’ effect on oil viscosity dynamics. The compositions of the used solvents were analyzed by a gas chromatography-mass spectrometer system equipped with a mass selective detector ISQ (USA). The evidence from the present study suggests that toluene and o-xylene are the most optimal solvents for enhancing the Akan oil recovery and reducing its viscosity. The obtained data demonstrated a higher efficiency of the used solvents on the oil viscosity reduction where the maximum oil viscosity reduction was observed in the presence of toluene, which led to a value of 178.1 mPa.s. Moreover, the obtained results reported that the solvent co-injection process efficiency increases gradually depending on the chemical composition of the used solvent, as witnessed by the obtained oil recovery factor (RF) values. It has been found that the oil recovery factor values during the capillary soaking in the presence of water was equal to 20%, in the presence of o-xylene it was equal to 61%, and in the presence of toluene, it was equal to 69%. Likewise, a similar efficiency behavior has been demonstrated during filtration experiments where water led to a 26% recovery factor, o-xylene to 69%, and toluene to 78%, meanwhile the solvent slug led to 65%. The results of this study would seem to suggest that the viscosity of the investigated oil decreases in the presence of aromatic solvents, such as toluene and o-xylene, as witnessed by the recovery factors they demonstrated. A consequence of these changes is the possibility that aromatic solvent molecules tend to separate the asphaltene layers and reduce the overlap between large asphaltene macromolecules, which leads to the dissociation of asphaltene aggregates.

[1]  M. Khelkhal,et al.  Conventional and high-field pulsed EPR experimental studies on Bazhenov oil formation under the influence of 50 Hz electromagnetic field , 2023, Fuel.

[2]  M. Khelkhal,et al.  In Situ Combustion of Heavy, Medium, and Light Crude Oils: Low-Temperature Oxidation in Terms of a Chain Reaction Approach , 2022, Energy & Fuels.

[3]  M. Khelkhal,et al.  Changes in Heavy Oil Saturates and Aromatics in the Presence of Microwave Radiation and Iron-Based Nanoparticles , 2022, Catalysts.

[4]  M. Khelkhal,et al.  Thermal Behavior of Heavy Oil Catalytic Pyrolysis and Aquathermolysis , 2022, Catalysts.

[5]  M. Khelkhal,et al.  Iron oxide nanoparticles impact on improving reservoir rock minerals catalytic effect on heavy oil aquathermolysis , 2022, Fuel.

[6]  D. A. Antonenko,et al.  On the use of metallic nanoparticulated catalysts for in-situ oil upgrading , 2021, Fuel.

[7]  S. A. Bulanova,et al.  Microwave Radiation Impact on Heavy Oil Upgrading from Carbonate Deposits in the Presence of Nano-Sized Magnetite , 2021, Processes.

[8]  M. Varfolomeev,et al.  Effect of copper stearate as catalysts on the performance of in-situ combustion process for heavy oil recovery and upgrading , 2021 .

[9]  A. Bolotov,et al.  IMPROVEMENT OF HEAVY OIL DISPLACEMENT EFFICIENCY BY USING AROMATIC HYDROCARBON SOLVENT , 2020 .

[10]  V. Klochkov,et al.  Hydrothermal upgrading of heavy oil in the presence of water at sub-critical, near-critical and supercritical conditions , 2020 .

[11]  M. Khelkhal,et al.  Kinetic Study of Heavy Oil Oxidation Using Oil Soluble Catalyst Based on Copper Tallates , 2019 .

[12]  M. Cao,et al.  Experimental and numerical study of solvent optimization during horizontal-well solvent-enhanced steam flooding in thin heavy-oil reservoirs , 2018, Fuel.

[13]  R. Okuno,et al.  Dimethyl Ether as an Additive to Steam for Improved Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage , 2018 .

[14]  S. Usmanov,et al.  Geochemical modeling with the use of vertical and horizontal relative concentrations of oil compounds for the heavy oil fields , 2018 .

[15]  A. Hamouda,et al.  Enhanced heavy oil recovery (SAGD), coinjection of steam and solvent, reduction of CEOR and CSOR , 2017 .

[16]  B. Maini,et al.  Multicomponent Solvent Co-injection with Steam in Heavy and Extra-Heavy Oil Reservoirs , 2016 .

[17]  R. Okuno,et al.  Optimal Application Conditions for Steam/Solvent Coinjection , 2015 .

[18]  W. Bae,et al.  An Investigation of Hybrid Steam-Solvent Injection for Increasing Economy and Reducing CO2 Emission , 2015 .

[19]  David Sinton,et al.  Steam-on-a-chip for oil recovery: the role of alkaline additives in steam assisted gravity drainage. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[20]  A. Naderifar,et al.  An Investigation on the Effects of the Reservoir Variables and Operational Parameters on Steam-Propane Injection Performance , 2013 .

[21]  N. Rezaei,et al.  Production Characteristics of the Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) and Solvent-Aided SAGD (SA-SAGD) Processes Using a 2-D Macroscale Physical Model , 2012 .

[22]  Wisup Bae,et al.  A Review of Practical Experience and Management of the SAGD Process for Oil Sands Development , 2011 .

[23]  S. M. Fatemi The Applicability of Expanding Solvent Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (ES-SAGD) in Fractured Systems , 2010 .

[24]  A. Bagci Steam Injection in Oil Reservoirs With Bottom Water Zone , 2005 .

[25]  N. R. Edmunds,et al.  Review of Phase A Steam-Assisted Gravity-Drainage Test , 1994 .