In-Service Safety Performance Evaluation of Roadside Concrete Barriers

Safety-shaped concrete barriers have been the most widely used rigid roadside barriers to shield errant motorists from roadside hazards or obstacles. These barriers are designed to lift impacting vehicles up and thereby extend the duration of impact and reduce the peak decelerations on the vehicle. However, safety-shaped concrete barriers tend to produce rollovers due to excessive vehicle climbing. Vertical concrete barriers, on the other hand, do not have the advantage of reducing impact forces by lifting the vehicle up, but they do produce lower roll angles. The objective of this research was to evaluate which of these two barrier profiles is the safest based on real-world vehicle crash data. The safest profile was defined as the one that produced lower driver injury severity levels and rollover propensity. It was found that safety-shaped barriers are more likely to produce rollovers as compared to vertical barriers. It was also found that crashes involving safety-shaped barriers tended to result in more severe driver injury levels. This finding was not statistically significant though. However, rollovers were found to significantly increase driver injury severity levels. Therefore, it is believed that the expanded use of vertical concrete barriers should improve overall highway safety.

[1]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[2]  Dot Hs,et al.  An Analysis of Motor Vehicle Rollover Crashes and Injury Outcomes , 2007 .

[3]  W Deutermann,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF FATAL ROLLOVER CRASHES , 2002 .

[4]  A. Agresti Categorical data analysis , 1993 .

[5]  Dean L Sicking,et al.  ROLLOVER CAUSED BY CONCRETE SAFETY-SHAPED BARRIER , 1989 .

[6]  Chao Wang,et al.  Road Traffic Congestion and Crash Severity: Econometric Analysis Using Ordered Response Models , 2010 .

[7]  Fan Ye Investigating the Effects of Underreporting of Crash Data on Three Commonly Used Traffic Crash Severity Models : Multinomial Logit , Ordered Probit and Mixed Logit Models , 2011 .

[8]  John G Viner,et al.  RISK OF ROLLOVER IN RAN-OFF-ROAD CRASHES , 1995 .

[9]  Francisco Daniel Albuquerque,et al.  Evaluation of the In-Service Safety Performance of Safety-Shape and Vertical Concrete Barriers , 2011 .

[10]  S Greenland,et al.  The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[11]  Robert A Rogers,et al.  A BRIDGE PARAPET DESIGNED FOR SAFETY: GENERAL MOTORS PROVING GROUND CIRCULAR TEST TRACK PROJECT , 1965 .

[12]  R N Field,et al.  DYNAMIC TESTS OF CONCRETE MEDIAN BARRIER SERIES XVI , 1967 .

[13]  A. Afifi,et al.  Comparison of Stopping Rules in Forward “Stepwise” Regression , 1977 .

[14]  D. Lord,et al.  Investigation of Effects of Underreporting Crash Data on Three Commonly Used Traffic Crash Severity Models , 2011 .

[15]  Hayes E Ross,et al.  PREDICTION OF ROLLOVERS CAUSED BY CONCRETE SAFETY-SHAPE BARRIERS , 1989 .

[16]  M C Frick,et al.  Seating position in cars and fatality risk. , 1988, American journal of public health.

[17]  Kung-Jong Lui,et al.  An application of a conditional logistic regression to study the effects of safety belts, principal impact points, and car weights on drivers' fatalities , 1988 .