Savings upon Re-Aiming in Visuomotor Adaptation

Sensorimotor adaptation has traditionally been viewed as a purely error-based process. There is, however, growing appreciation for the idea that performance changes in these tasks can arise from the interplay of error-based adaptation with other learning processes. The challenge is to specify constraints on these different processes, elucidating their respective contributions to performance, as well as the manner in which they interact. We address this question by exploring constraints on savings, the phenomenon in which people show faster performance gains when the same learning task is repeated. In a series of five experiments, we demonstrate that error-based learning associated with sensorimotor adaptation does not contribute to savings. Instead, savings reflects improvements in action selection, rather than motor execution. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Savings is the phenomenon in which people show faster relearning of a previously forgotten memory. In the motor learning domain, this phenomenon has been a puzzle for learning models that operate exclusively on error-based learning processes. We demonstrate, in a series of experiments, that savings selectively reflects improvements in action selection: Participants are more adept in invoking an appropriate aiming strategy when presented with a previously experienced perturbation. Indeed, improvements in action selection appear to be the sole source of savings in visuomotor adaptation tasks. We observe no evidence of savings in implicit error-based adaptation.

[1]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  R. Dolan,et al.  Subliminal Instrumental Conditioning Demonstrated in the Human Brain , 2008, Neuron.

[3]  M. Mauk,et al.  A Mechanism for Savings in the Cerebellum , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Krista M Bond,et al.  Flexible explicit but rigid implicit learning in a visuomotor adaptation task. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  Flexible Cognitive Strategies during Motor Learning , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[6]  Hermann Ebbinghaus,et al.  Memory: a contribution to experimental psychology. , 1987, Annals of neurosciences.

[7]  N. Schweighofer,et al.  Dual Adaptation Supports a Parallel Architecture of Motor Memory , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Explicit and Implicit Contributions to Learning in a Sensorimotor Adaptation Task , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Vincent S. Huang,et al.  Rethinking Motor Learning and Savings in Adaptation Paradigms: Model-Free Memory for Successful Actions Combines with Internal Models , 2011, Neuron.

[10]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Interacting Adaptive Processes with Different Timescales Underlie Short-Term Motor Learning , 2006, PLoS biology.

[11]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Explaining savings for visuomotor adaptation: linear time-invariant state-space models are not sufficient. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  David M. Huberdeau,et al.  The Influence of Movement Preparation Time on the Expression of Visuomotor Learning and Savings , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Konrad P. Körding,et al.  Estimating the Relevance of World Disturbances to Explain Savings, Interference and Long-Term Motor Adaptation Effects , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[14]  D. Wolpert,et al.  The effect of contextual cues on the encoding of motor memories , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Principles of sensorimotor learning , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  A memory of errors in sensorimotor learning , 2014, Science.

[17]  David M. Huberdeau,et al.  Formation of a long-term memory for visuomotor adaptation following only a few trials of practice. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Adaptation to Visuomotor Transformations: Consolidation, Interference, and Forgetting , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  R. Miall,et al.  Adaptation to rotated visual feedback: a re-examination of motor interference , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Failure to Consolidate the Consolidation Theory of Learning for Sensorimotor Adaptation Tasks , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Jordan A Taylor,et al.  Explicit and Implicit Processes Constitute the Fast and Slow Processes of Sensorimotor Learning , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration. , 1995, Science.

[23]  J. Krakauer,et al.  An Implicit Plan Overrides an Explicit Strategy during Visuomotor Adaptation , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  B Wallace,et al.  Adaptive coordination and alignment of eye and hand. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[25]  John W Krakauer,et al.  Motor learning and consolidation: the case of visuomotor rotation. , 2009, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[26]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  MOSAIC Model for Sensorimotor Learning and Control , 2001, Neural Computation.

[27]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Learning not to generalize: modular adaptation of visuomotor gain. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  R B Welch,et al.  Multiple concurrent visual-motor mappings: implications for models of adaptation. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Philippe Lefèvre,et al.  Formation of model-free motor memories during motor adaptation depends on perturbation schedule. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Rieko Osu,et al.  Short- and long-term changes in joint co-contraction associated with motor learning as revealed from surface EMG. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.