ERPs and Strategy: First, Do No Harm

ERP and other systems projects are now commonly preceded or accompanied by reengineering efforts. Traditional reengineering projects use a ‘clean sheet’ approach, in which companies attempt to design ideal processes without being bound to existing processes and constraints. When reengineering is associated with information technology (IT) implementation, the more common approach is known as ‘tool-driven’ or ‘system-enhanced’ reengineering. Under this approach, the new processes are designed with explicit attention to the opportunities and constraints presented by the capabilities of the new information system. Although IT-related reengineering approaches have matured through time, they have not kept pace with current perspectives on corporate strategy and competitive advantage. The perspective on strategy to which they implicitly subscribe is an industrial organization or industry structure model that is not sufficient to guide reengineering efforts when strategic advantage is at stake. Drawing on current, resource-based theories of strategy, this paper describes factors the organizations should consider when they wish to take a more strategic approach to process reengineering—one explicitly oriented to the creation and maintenance of sustainable competitive advantage. ERPS AND STRATEGY: FIRST, DO NO HARM It is interesting to note that, in an era where it is expected that IS will align itself with the goals of the enterprise, the exact opposite is happening with ERPs—the enterprise must align its processes with those of its chosen ERP! (Glass, 1998)

[1]  Robin S. Poston,et al.  Financial impacts of enterprise resource planning implementations , 2001, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[2]  R. Hall The strategic analysis of intangible resources , 1992 .

[3]  Prasad Bingi,et al.  Critical Issues Affecting an ERP Implementation , 1999, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[4]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[5]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[6]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[7]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Enterprise resource planning and organizational knowledge: patterns of convergence and divergence , 2000, ICIS.

[8]  E. Shils The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[9]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Systems , Life Cycle , Electronic Commerce , and Risk , 2002 .

[10]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Managing Information about Processes , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Robert L. Glass,et al.  Enterprise resource planning--breakthrough and/or term problem? , 1998, DATB.

[12]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[13]  James E. Hunton,et al.  Blending Information and Communication Technology with Accounting Research , 2002 .

[14]  Varun Grover,et al.  The Role of Organizational and Information Technology Antecedents in Reengineering Initiation Behavior , 1999 .

[15]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value , 1996, MIS Q..

[16]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Beyond the productivity paradox , 1998, CACM.

[17]  Mikko A. Junttila,et al.  A resource-based view of manufacturing strategy and the relationship to manufacturing performance , 2002 .

[18]  R. Kanter Collaborative advantage: The art of alliances , 1994 .

[19]  Gavin J. Wright An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1982 .

[20]  D. Barton Wellsprings of knowledge: building and sustaining the sources of innovation , 1995 .

[21]  R. Johnston,et al.  Towards a Strategy for Knowledge Management , 1999 .

[22]  M. Venkatraman It-enabled business transformation: from automation to business scope redefinition , 1994 .

[23]  D. L. Flarey Reengineering the Corporation , 1994 .

[24]  Stephen P. Laughlin AN ERP GAME PLAN , 1999 .

[25]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Requirements Engineering for Enterprise Systems , 2001 .

[26]  Richard L. Nolan,et al.  Reengineering a Business Process , 1995 .

[27]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[28]  G. Philip,et al.  Technology, competencies, and competitiveness: The case for reconfigurable and flexible strategies , 1998 .

[29]  Antonio Davila,et al.  Performance Measurement and Control Systems for Implementing Strategy: Text and Cases , 1999 .

[30]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Locating Adaptive Learning: The Situated Nature of Adaptive Learning in Organizations , 1997 .

[31]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[32]  Charles J. Fombrun,et al.  Constructing competitive advantage: The role of firm-constituent interactions , 1999 .

[33]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[34]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. pp. . , 1990 .

[35]  Steve G. Sutton,et al.  The changing face of accounting in an information technology dominated world , 2000, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Robert W. Smyth,et al.  Threats to ERP Success: A Case Study , 2001, PACIS.

[37]  Peter Weill,et al.  The Implications of Information Technology Infrastructure for Business Process Redesign , 1999, MIS Q..

[38]  Angela Lin,et al.  Mission Critical: Realizing the Promise of Enterprise Systems , 2001 .

[39]  R. M. Hall,et al.  A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage , 1993 .

[40]  M Williams,et al.  Managing Quality , 2018 .

[41]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Manage Your Information as a Product , 1998 .

[42]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Information Technology and Internal Firm Organization: An Exploratory Analysis , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[43]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[44]  A. Giddens The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[45]  J. Spender Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[46]  M. Rosemann Using Reference Models within the Enterprise Resource Planning Lifecycle , 2000 .

[47]  G. Stalk,et al.  Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy. , 1992, Harvard business review.