Complex-Natural-Resonance-Based Design of Chipless RFID Tag for High-Density Data

Each scatterer responds to the incident wave in a unique manner. The backscattered signal from the scatterer is affected by two distinct phenomena: early-time response which emanates from the scattering centers of the scatterer and late-time response which is the summation of the complex natural resonances (CNRs) with some weighting residues. Based on the singularity expansion method (SEM), CNRs are aspect-independent parameters which include some structural information of the scattering target. Based on this fact, the data can be embedded on the RFID tag as CNRs associated to the structural parameters. In this paper, a low-profile chipless RFID tag as a suitable device for high-density data is introduced. By incorporating several slots on the chipless RFID tag, the data can be encoded as CNRs on the structure. The designed RFID tag operates in the frequency band of 3.1-10.6 GHz. The data are decoded in the reader by applying short-time matrix pencil method (STMPM) to the transient backscattered response of the tag. In addition, the turn-on times, damping factors, and resonant frequencies of the poles are distinguished. After studying the effects of various parameters of the tag, a 24-bit tag is designed on the area of 24 × 24 mm2, simulated and measured. The measurement is performed in the frequency domain and, after applying inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT), STMPM is employed to extract the signature of the tag. The tag is successfully read remotely via its scattered fields.

[1]  Ehud Heyman,et al.  A wavefront interpretation of the singularity expansion method , 1985 .

[2]  M. Manteghi,et al.  Short-Time Matrix Pencil Method for Chipless RFID Detection Applications , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[3]  Pavlos Vlachos,et al.  Application of singularity expansion method for monitoring the deployment of arterial stents , 2012 .

[4]  M. Manteghi,et al.  Embedded Singularity Chipless RFID Tags , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[5]  Carl E. Baum,et al.  On the Singularity Expansion Method for the Solution of Electromagnetic Interaction Problems , 1971 .

[6]  Majid Manteghi,et al.  Pole residue techniques for chipless RFID detection , 2009, 2009 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium.

[7]  K. Vasudevan,et al.  Chipless RFID Tag Using Multiple Microstrip Open Stub Resonators , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[8]  Majid Manteghi,et al.  A space-time-frequency target identification technique for chipless RFID applications , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (APSURSI).

[9]  N.C. Karmakar,et al.  A Novel Chipless RFID System Based on Planar Multiresonators for Barcode Replacement , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on RFID.

[10]  Y. Rahmat-Samii,et al.  Frequency notched UWB elliptical dipole tag with multi-bit data scattering properties , 2007, 2007 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium.

[11]  Resonance Behavior of Radar Targets With Aperture: Example of an Open Rectangular Cavity , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[12]  Werner Ruile,et al.  Programmable reflectors for SAW-ID-tags , 1993 .

[13]  S. Tedjini,et al.  High-Capacity Chipless RFID Tag Insensitive to the Polarization , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[14]  S. Licul,et al.  Unified frequency and time-domain antenna modeling and characterization , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[15]  R. Altes.  Sonar for generalized target description and its similarity to animal echolocation systems. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  R. Harrington.  Time-Harmonic Electromagnetic Fields , 1961 .