Two Pairs of Conflicting Motives in Decision Making.

A concept is proposed that decision making consists of resolving two conflicts. One of them is between the desire to make an accurate decision and the desire to minimize the effort of making a choice. The second conflict is between the desire to make an accurate decision and the desire that this decision is distinct. To operationalize basic motives involved in decision making, as assumed in the model, a new process tracing technique has been developed. Using this technique, three experiments were performed to test the predictions of the model. The experiments supported the predictions concerning the conflict between accuracy and distinctness. Similarity of choice alternative and decision importance appeared to affect the way the conflict between accuracy and distinctiveness is solved. An alternative explanation of the results obtained and perspectives of further research are discussed. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

[1]  Henry Montgomery,et al.  Information search and evaluative processes in decision making: A computer based process tracing study , 1984 .

[2]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring ☆ , 1983 .

[3]  David A. Schkade,et al.  Numeric and linguistic information representation in multiattribute choice , 1991 .

[4]  Berndt Brehmer,et al.  New directions in research on decision making , 1986 .

[5]  Robert S. Billings,et al.  The effects of response mode and importance on decision-making strategies: Judgment versus choice , 1988 .

[6]  Henry Montgomery,et al.  Decision Rules and the Search for a Dominance Structure: Towards a Process Model of Decision Making* , 1983 .

[7]  Jay J.J. Christensen-Szalanski,et al.  Problem solving strategies: A selection mechanism, some implications, and some data. , 1978 .

[8]  S. Harkins.  Social Loafing and Social Facilitation , 1987 .

[9]  C. M. Jagacinski.  Evaluation of job candidates with missing information: Effects of attribute importance and interattribute correlation , 1994 .

[10]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Introspecting about Reasons can Reduce Post-Choice Satisfaction , 1993 .

[11]  Ulf Böckenholt,et al.  The effects of attractiveness, dominance, and attribute differences on information acquisition in multiattribute binary choice , 1991 .

[12]  Steven M. Shugan.  The Cost Of Thinking , 1980 .

[13]  O. Svenson.  Process descriptions of decision making. , 1979 .

[14]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[15]  M. Shelly,et al.  HUMAN JUDGMENTS AND OPTIMALITY.. , 1966 .

[16]  Jean C. Bedard,et al.  The Effects of Task Size and Similarity on the Decision Behavior of Bank Loan Officers , 1985 .

[17]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  More than Meets the Eye: The Effect of Missing Information on Purchase Evaluations , 1985 .

[18]  O. Svenson.  Differentiation and consolidation theory of human decision making: A frame of reference for the study of pre- and post-decision processes , 1992 .

[19]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. , 1992 .

[20]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Influences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation , 1990 .

[21]  John W. Payne,et al.  Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis☆ , 1976 .

[22]  Oswald Huber,et al.  The influence of some task variables on cognitive operations in an information-processing decision model , 1980 .

[23]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Dimensional Commensurability and Cue Utilization in Comparative Judgment. , 1974 .

[24]  H. Montgomery.  From cognition to action: The search for dominance in decision making. , 1989 .

[25]  Margaret G. Meloy,et al.  The Distortion of Information during Decisions , 1996 .

[26]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  The role of attitudes in memory-based decision making. , 1990 .

[27]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  A componential analysis of cognitive effort in choice , 1990 .

[28]  J. March.  Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice , 1978 .

[29]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[30]  John W. Payne,et al.  Contingent decision behavior. , 1982 .

[31]  H. Montgomery,et al.  Process and structure in human decision making , 1992 .

[32]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  Initial impression versus missing information as explanations of the set-size effect. , 1983 .

[33]  Tadeusz Tyszka,et al.  Must boxing verdicts be biased , 1991 .

[34]  L. Beach,et al.  A Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies , 1978 .

[35]  James Jaccard,et al.  The effects of incomplete information on the formation of attitudes toward behavioral alternatives. , 1988 .

[36]  R. Zajonc.  Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[37]  Christopher P. Puto,et al.  Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity & the Similarity Hypothesis. , 1981 .

[38]  James A. Wise,et al.  Human decision making , 1983 .