A multi‐model/multi‐analysis limited area ensemble: calibration issues

In this paper four different post-processing techniques: the Bayesian model averaging (BMA), the ensemble model output statistics (EMOS) with a variant known as EMOS+ and a new dressing kernel (DRESS) are applied and compared, in a pre-operational context, to calibrate a mesoscale multi-model multi-analysis ensemble. The ensemble makes use of three different limited area models (Bologna Limited Area Model (BOLAM), MM5 and RAMS), one of them used twice with different setups, fed with two sets of analysis and boundary conditions obtained from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) general circulation models. The resulting ensemble of eight members was run for a period of 6 months (from October 2002 to April 2003) in a Euro–Atlantic domain. The forecast was validated against 2 m temperature measured at 21 meteorological stations scattered across Sardinia (Italy). For each method the calibration ability was assessed evaluating the flatness of the rank histogram, the coverage of the expected forecast intervals and the width of the associated probability distribution function. Results show that BMA and DRESS are the best in improving the calibration of the raw ensemble whereas EMOS and EMOS+ have proven worse, with the latter marginally better. Copyright © 2008 Royal Meteorological Society

[1]  T. N. Krishnamurti,et al.  Improved Weather and Seasonal Climate Forecasts from Multimodel Superensemble. , 1999, Science.

[2]  Thomas M. Hamill,et al.  Probabilistic Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts Based on Reforecast Analogs: Theory and Application , 2006 .

[3]  C. Bishop,et al.  Improvement of ensemble reliability with a new dressing kernel , 2005 .

[4]  Eugenia Kalnay,et al.  Ensemble Forecasting at NMC: The Generation of Perturbations , 1993 .

[5]  A. Raftery,et al.  Using Bayesian Model Averaging to Calibrate Forecast Ensembles , 2005 .

[6]  E. Lorenz.  A study of the predictability of a 28-variable atmospheric model , 1965 .

[7]  Andrea Buzzi,et al.  Validation of a limited area model in cases of mediterranean cyclogenesis: Surface fields and precipitation scores , 1994 .

[8]  Anton H. Westveld,et al.  Calibrated Probabilistic Forecasting Using Ensemble Model Output Statistics and Minimum CRPS Estimation , 2005 .

[9]  E. Grimit,et al.  Initial Results of a Mesoscale Short-Range Ensemble Forecasting System over the Pacific Northwest , 2002 .

[10]  F. Molteni,et al.  A strategy for high‐resolution ensemble prediction. I: Definition of representative members and global‐model experiments , 2001 .

[11]  R. Buizza,et al.  Application of a Limited-Area Short-Range Ensemble Forecast System to a Case of Heavy Rainfall in the Mediterranean Region , 2004 .

[12]  R. Pielke,et al.  A comprehensive meteorological modeling system—RAMS , 1992 .

[13]  G. Grell,et al.  A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5) , 1994 .

[14]  M. Ehrendorfer.  Vorhersage der Unsicherheit numerischer Wetterprognosen: eine Übersicht , 1997 .