Non-line-of-sight identification in ultra-wideband systems based on received signal statistics

Non-line-of-sight (NLOS) propagation can severely degrade the reliability of communication and localisation accuracy in indoor ultra-wideband (UWB) ‘location-aware’ networks. Link adaptation and NLOS bias mitigation techniques have respectively been proposed to alleviate these effects, but implicitly rely on the ability to accurately distinguish between LOS and NLOS propagation scenarios. A statistical NLOS identification technique based on the hypothesis-testing of received signal parameters in UWB propagation channels is discussed. In contrast to narrowband and wideband signals, UWB signals possess higher temporal resolution and robustness to multipath fading. We show that these characteristics result in differences in the statistics of (a) the time-of-arrival (TOA), (b) the received signal strength (RSS) and (c) the root-mean-squared delay spread (RDS) of the received signals, between LOS and NLOS propagation scenarios, which can be exploited for accurate channel identification. We statistically characterise the ability of TOA, RSS and RDS estimates to distinguish between LOS and NLOS propagation based on an extensive indoor measurement campaign. Our measurement results suggest that the RDS of UWB signals can, even in isolation and without complete statistical information, serve as a robust and computationally efficient indicator of the LOS/NLOS nature of propagation. Finally, we demonstrate the efficacy of the discussed NLOS identification method in a location-tracking application based on indoor UWB measurements.

[1]  Larry J. Greenstein,et al.  UWB delay profile models for residential and commercial indoor environments , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[2]  R. Michael Buehrer,et al.  NLOS Mitigation Using Linear Programming in Ultrawideband Location-Aware Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[3]  Scott M. Yano Investigating the ultra-wideband indoor wireless channel , 2002, Vehicular Technology Conference. IEEE 55th Vehicular Technology Conference. VTC Spring 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37367).

[4]  Moe Z. Win,et al.  Impulse radio: how it works , 1998, IEEE Communications Letters.

[5]  Moe Z. Win,et al.  Evaluation of the multipath characteristics of the impulse radio channel , 1998, Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (Cat. No.98TH8361).

[6]  Benoit Denis,et al.  Impact of NLOS propagation upon ranging precision in UWB systems , 2003, IEEE Conference on Ultra Wideband Systems and Technologies, 2003.

[7]  Chia-Chin Chong,et al.  Statistical characterization of the UWB propagation channel in indoor residential environment , 2005, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[8]  Robert A. Scholtz,et al.  Ranging in a dense multipath environment using an UWB radio link , 2002, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[9]  R. Michael Buehrer,et al.  A linear programming approach to NLOS error mitigation in sensor networks , 2006, 2006 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[10]  Rodney A. Kennedy,et al.  Cramer-Rao lower bounds for the time delay estimation of UWB signals , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37577).

[11]  Rittwik Jana,et al.  Measurement and modeling of an ultra-wide bandwidth indoor channel , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[12]  J. Holtzman,et al.  The non-line of sight problem in mobile location estimation , 1996, Proceedings of ICUPC - 5th International Conference on Universal Personal Communications.

[13]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .

[14]  Ian Oppermann,et al.  UWB wireless sensor networks: UWEN - a practical example , 2004, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[15]  Z. Irahhauten,et al.  An overview of ultra wide band indoor channel measurements and modeling , 2004, IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters.

[16]  Ismail Güvenç,et al.  Threshold selection for UWB TOA estimation based on kurtosis analysis , 2005, IEEE Communications Letters.

[17]  S. Zeisberg,et al.  UWB receiver performance comparison , 2004, 2004 International Workshop on Ultra Wideband Systems Joint with Conference on Ultra Wideband Systems and Technologies. Joint UWBST & IWUWBS 2004 (IEEE Cat. No.04EX812).

[18]  Hisashi Kobayashi,et al.  Analysis of wireless geolocation in a non-line-of-sight environment , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[19]  N.B. Mandayam,et al.  Decision theoretic framework for NLOS identification , 1998, VTC '98. 48th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference. Pathway to Global Wireless Revolution (Cat. No.98CH36151).

[20]  J. Foerster,et al.  Channel modeling sub-committee report final , 2002 .

[21]  Larry J. Greenstein,et al.  UWB indoor delay profile model for residential and commercial environments , 2003, 2003 IEEE 58th Vehicular Technology Conference. VTC 2003-Fall (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37484).

[22]  A. Molisch,et al.  IEEE 802.15.4a channel model-final report , 2004 .