Telecommunications Interception in Turkey: Rights to Privacy vs. Discourses of Security

The paper discusses telecommunication interceptions in Turkey as a state surveilling itself as well as its citizens. While surveillance of state officials including the judiciary indicates a perception of threat from inside the state, these perceptions overlap with the ‘deep state’ phenomenon in Turkey. Despite the 2005 legal reforms which introduce strict legal standards for communications surveillance, current political developments reveal that wiretapping remains as a commonly used micro-power application. The paper, by utilizing Foucault’s theory, aims to uncover the ‘conditions of possibility’ for the use of this disciplinary technique in Turkey with a certain focus on the actual power relations and discourses of truth. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61350-323-2.ch4.7

[1]  Ran Hirschl.  The New Constitutionalism and the Judicialization of Pure Politics Worldwide , 2006 .

[2]  Güneş Murat Tezcür,et al.  Judicial Activism in Perilous Times: The Turkish Case , 2009 .

[3]  K. A. Taipale,et al.  Technology, Security and Privacy: The Fear of Frankenstein, the Mythology of Privacy and the Lessons of King Ludd , 2004 .

[4]  S. Bronitt,et al.  Regulating Telecommunications Interception and Access in the Twenty‐first Century: Technological Evolution or Legal Revolution? 1 , 2006 .

[5]  G. Jenkins.  Continuity and Change: Prospects for Civil-Military Relations in Turkey , 2007 .

[6]  S. Aydin,et al.  European Integration and the Transformation of Turkish Democracy. CEPS EU-Turkey Working Papers No. 2, 1 August 2004 , 2004 .

[7]  R. Filho,et al.  Security, territory, population (Lectures at the College de France) , 2011 .

[8]  Vito Cappellini,et al.  Estimate of PRNU Noise Based on Different Noise Models for Source Camera Identification , 2010, Int. J. Digit. Crime Forensics.

[9]  David Murakami Wood.  The `Surveillance Society' , 2009 .

[10]  Ümit Cizre.  Demythologyzing the National Security Concept: The Case of Turkey , 2003 .

[11]  Victor Tadros.  Between Governance and Discipline: The Law and Michel Foucault , 1998 .

[12]  Ran Hirschl.  The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts , 2008 .

[13]  D. Halder,et al.  Definition, Typology and Patterns of Victimization , 2012 .

[14]  Paul De Hert,et al.  Balancing security and liberty within the European human rights framework. A critical reading of the Court’s case law in the light of surveillance and criminal law enforcement strategies after 9/11 , 2005 .

[15]  T. Holt,et al.  A Profile of the Demographics, Psychological Predispositions, and Social/Behavioral Patterns of Computer Hacker Insiders and Outsiders , 2009 .

[16]  Esen Kirdiş,et al.  In Pursuit of “Contemporary Civilization”: Judicial Empowerment in Turkey , 2009 .

[17]  B. Stone,et al.  Foucault, Michel . Abnormal: Lectures at the College de France,1974-1975 , New York:Picador, 2003; "Society Must Be Defended:"Lectures at the College de France, 1975-1976 . New York: Picador, 2003 , 2004 .

[18]  A. Fontana,et al.  Security, Territory, Population , 2009 .

[19]  International Journal of Digital Crime and Forensics , 2022 .

[20]  The end of privacy. , 2008, Stanford law review.

[21]  Hootan Shambayati.  A TALE OF TWO MAYORS: COURTS AND POLITICS IN IRAN AND TURKEY , 2004, International Journal of Middle East Studies.

[22]  Cemal Karakas.  Turkey: Islam and Laicism between the interests of state, politics, and society , 2007 .

[23]  Karuppannan Jaishankar,et al.  Cyber Crime and the Victimization of Women: Laws, Rights and Regulations , 2012 .

[24]  Ran Hirschl.  Constitutional Courts Vs. Religious Fundamentalism: Three Middle Eastern Tales , 2004 .

[25]  P. Bilgin,et al.  The Securityness of Secularism? The Case of Turkey , 2008 .

[26]  Amal Jamal.  Democratizing state–religion relations: a comparative study of Turkey, Egypt and Israel , 2009 .

[27]  Paul M. Schwartz,et al.  German and U.S. Telecommunications Privacy Law: Legal Regulation of Domestic Law Enforcement Surveillance , 2003 .