Left But Not Right Temporal Involvement in Opaque Idiom Comprehension: A Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study

It has been suggested that figurative language, which includes idioms, is controlled by the right hemisphere. We tested the right hemisphere hypothesis by using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to transiently disrupt the function of the frontal and temporal areas of the right versus left hemisphere in a group of normal participants involved in a task of opaque idiom versus literal sentence comprehension. Forty opaque, nonambiguous idioms were selected. Fifteen young healthy participants underwent rTMS in two sessions. The experiment was run in five blocks, corresponding to the four stimulated scalp positions (left frontal and temporal and right frontal and temporal) and a baseline. Each block consisted of 16 trials8 trials with idioms and 8 trials with literal sentences. In each trial, the subject was presented with a written sentence, which appeared on the screen for 2000 msec, followed by a pair of pictures for 2500 msec, one of which corresponded to the sentence. The alternative corresponded to the literal meaning for idioms and to a sentence differing in a detail in the case of literal sentences. The subject had to press a button corresponding to the picture matching the string. Reaction times increased following left temporal rTMS, whereas they were unaffected by right hemisphere rTMS, with no difference between idiomatic and literal sentences. Left temporal rTMS also reduced accuracy without differences between the two types of sentences. These data suggest that opaque idiom and literal sentence comprehension depends on the left temporal cortex.

[1]  D. Lancker,et al.  Comprehension of familiar phrases by left- but not by right-hemisphere damaged patients , 1987, Brain and Language.

[2]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The access and processing of idiomatic expressions , 1979 .

[3]  P M Rossini,et al.  Left frontal transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces contralesional extinction in patients with unilateral right brain damage. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  K M Eberhard,et al.  Dissociation between syntactic and semantic processing during idiom comprehension. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  F. M. Mottaghy,et al.  Facilitation of picture naming by focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of Wernicke’s area , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  C. Burgess,et al.  Neurocognitive Mechanisms Underlying Metaphor Comprehension and Other Figurative Language , 1996 .

[7]  G Vallar,et al.  Understanding metaphors and idioms: A single-case neuropsychological study in a person with Down syndrome , 2001, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[8]  Sara Torriero,et al.  Underestimation of time perception after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2003, Neurology.

[9]  A. Healy,et al.  Sentence interference in the Stroop task , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[10]  Raymond W. Gibbs,et al.  How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing , 1989 .

[11]  S. Zanini,et al.  The effects of age and education on pragmatic features of verbal communication: Evidence from the Italian version of the Right Hemisphere Language Battery (I-RHLB) , 2005 .

[12]  M. Hallett,et al.  Depression of motor cortex excitability by low‐frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1997, Neurology.

[13]  Daniel Kempler,et al.  Acquisition and loss of familiar language: Idiom and proverb comprehension , 1993 .

[14]  C. Papagno,et al.  Idiom comprehension in Alzheimer's disease: the role of the central executive. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  E. Bisiach,et al.  rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere transiently reduces contralesional visuospatial hemineglect , 2001, Neurology.

[16]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Modulation of corticospinal excitability by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  M Seyal,et al.  Increased sensitivity to ipsilateral cutaneous stimuli following transcranial magnetic stimulation of the parietal lobe , 1995, Annals of neurology.

[18]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: new insights into representational cortical plasticity , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  D L Woods,et al.  Electrophysiologic evidence of increased distractibility after dorsolateral prefrontal lesions , 1986, Neurology.

[20]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience – virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[21]  C. Papagno,et al.  Comprehension of metaphors and idioms in patients with Alzheimer's disease: a longitudinal study. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  Rachel R W Robertson,et al.  The role of suppression in figurative language comprehension. , 1999, Journal of pragmatics.

[23]  P. Rossini,et al.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  S. Glucksberg.  Understanding figurative language : from metaphors to idioms , 2001 .

[25]  Costanza Papagno,et al.  The role of syntactic competence in idiom comprehension: a study on aphasic patients , 2004, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[26]  R. Giora,et al.  On understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative language☆ , 1999 .

[27]  P M Rossini,et al.  Time-dependent activation of parieto-frontal networks for directing attention to tactile space. A study with paired transcranial magnetic stimulation pulses in right-brain-damaged patients with extinction. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  D. Parisi,et al.  Syntactic comprehension in aphasia. , 1970, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[29]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Syntactic frozenness in processing and remembering idioms , 1985, Cognition.

[30]  Robert A. Wilson,et al.  Book Reviews: The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences , 2000, CL.

[31]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Pragmatic Aspects of Communication in Brain-Damaged Patients**We wish to acknowledge the support of the National Institute of Neurological and Communication Disorders and Stroke (M 11408), the Veterans Administration and Harvard Project Zero. , 1983 .

[32]  Aileen B. Sedman,et al.  A longitudinal study , 1987 .

[33]  C. Tompkins,et al.  The access and processing of familiar idioms by brain-damaged and normally aging adults. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[34]  Mascha van 't Wout,et al.  COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROPSYCHOLOGY NEUROREPORT Repetitive , 2005 .

[35]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Grammatical Distinctions in the Left Frontal Cortex , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  P. Tabossi,et al.  The comprehension of idioms. , 1988 .

[38]  Costanza Papagno,et al.  Idiom comprehension in aphasic patients , 2004, Brain and Language.

[39]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  Idiom comprehension in children and adults with unilateral brain damage , 1999 .

[40]  Guy Vingerhoets,et al.  What is said or how it is said makes a difference: role of the right fronto‐parietal operculum in emotional prosody as revealed by repetitive TMS , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.