Comparison of range of motion and function of subjects with reverse anatomy Bayley-Walker shoulder replacement with those of normal subjects.

Patients with rotator cuff tear and degenerative shoulder joint disease commonly experience severe pain and reduced performance during activities of daily living. A popular way to treat these patients is by means of reverse anatomy shoulder prosthesis. Studying the kinematics of subjects with reverse anatomy implant would be useful in order to gain knowledge about functionality of different designs. It is hypothesized that the kinematics of these subjects, in the absence of rotator cuff muscles, differs from that of normal subjects. In this study the upper limb kinematics of 12 subjects with a Bayley-Walker reverse anatomy shoulder prosthesis while performing tasks common in everyday activities and those that represent the range of motion was analyzed and compared to that of 12 normal subjects. Each patient also completed an Oxford Shoulder Score. Substantial reduction in the Bayley-Walker subjects' ranges of motion was observed compared to normal subjects. The mean abduction angle decreased from 109° (±20) for normal subjects to 64° (±25). A similar trend was observed during flexion and axial rotation tasks. Furthermore, the normal group showed less variable ranges of motion performing the standard tasks, whereas for the prosthetic group this varied greatly, which is likely to be dependent on muscle strength. Although the decreased range of motion was prominent, subjects were able to complete most of the tasks by compensating with their elbow and trunk. The most challenging task for Bayley-Walker subjects was lifting an object to head height.

[1]  W. Willems,et al.  Contribution of the Reverse Endoprosthesis to Glenohumeral Kinematics , 2008, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  C. Ball,et al.  The SMR reverse shoulder prosthesis in the treatment of cuff-deficient shoulder conditions. , 2009, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[3]  Jonathan C. Levy,et al.  Use of the reverse shoulder prosthesis for the treatment of failed hemiarthroplasty in patients with glenohumeral arthritis and rotator cuff deficiency. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  Jaap Harlaar,et al.  Complete 3D kinematics of upper extremity functional tasks. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[5]  Matthew Vasey,et al.  The Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  N. Poppen,et al.  Normal and abnormal motion of the shoulder. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  J P Paul,et al.  Three-Dimensional Joint Co-Ordination Strategies of the Upper Limb during Functional Activities , 1996, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[8]  G. Johnson,et al.  Alteration of Scapula Lateral Rotation for Subjects with the Reversed Anatomy Shoulder Replacement and its Influence on Glenohumeral Joint Contact Force , 2011, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[9]  G. R. Johnson,et al.  KINEMATICS PERFORMANCE ON ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING AFTER REVERSE SHOULDER JOINT REPLACEMENT , 2007 .

[10]  F C T van der Helm,et al.  Requirements for upper extremity motions during activities of daily living. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[11]  G R Johnson,et al.  A model for the prediction of the forces at the glenohumeral joint , 2006, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[12]  G R Johnson,et al.  Reverse anatomy shoulder replacement: Comparison of two designs , 2010, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[13]  D R Pichora,et al.  Glenohumeral contact forces , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[14]  G R Johnson,et al.  Dynamics of the Upper Limb during Performance of the Tasks of Everyday Living—A Review of the Current Knowledge Base , 1996, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[15]  O. Gagey,et al.  Mechanics of the Deltoid Muscle: A New Approach , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  B F Morrey,et al.  Three‐dimensional kinematics of glenohumeral elevation , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[17]  S T Tümer,et al.  Three-dimensional kinematic modelling of the human shoulder complex--Part I: Physical model and determination of joint sinus cones. , 1989, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[18]  G R Johnson,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative descriptions of glenohumeral motion. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[19]  A. Quanbury,et al.  Normal functional range of motion of upper limb joints during performance of three feeding activities. , 1990, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  Garth R Johnson,et al.  A study of the external forces and moments at the shoulder and elbow while performing every day tasks. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  N C Dunham,et al.  Measurement of Activities of Daily Living in Hospitalized Elderly: A Comparison of Self‐Report and Performance‐Based Methods , 1992, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[22]  Bryan Buchholz,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  F C T van der Helm,et al.  A kinematical analysis of the shoulder after arthroplasty during a hair combing task. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[24]  Matthew Vasey,et al.  The reverse shoulder prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. a minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients surgical technique. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  A. Carr,et al.  Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[26]  S L Delp,et al.  A graphics-based software system to develop and analyze models of musculoskeletal structures. , 1995, Computers in biology and medicine.

[27]  F. V. D. van der Helm,et al.  Three-dimensional recording and description of motions of the shoulder mechanism. , 1995, Journal of biomechanical engineering.